In this article I discuss the meaning of progress in geography and the social sciences in general in the light of recent debates in the philosophy and sociology of science. I review the way in which notions of progress derived from different philosophies of science have been used in geography in the past, before focusing on the kinds of constructivist challenges posed in recent work by authors such as Barnes. I criticize these approaches from a realist-constructivist perspective and argue for a deeper engagement with social epistemology.
Ankersmit, F. and Mooij, J., editors, 1993: Knowledge and language. Volume III. Metaphor and knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
2.
Ashmore, M. 1989: The reflexive thesis: wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Backhouse, R.1994: The Lakatosian legacy in economic methodology. In Backhouse, R. editor,New directions in economic methodology, London: Routledge, 173–191.
4.
Barnes, J.1977: Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge.
5.
Barnes, T.1992: Reading the texts of theoretical economic geography: the role of physical and biological metaphors. In Barnes, T. and Duncan, J., editors, Writing worlds, London: Routledge, 118–135.
6.
Barnes, T.1996: Logics of dislocation: models, metaphors, and meanings of economic space. London: Guilford Press.
7.
Bassett, K.1994: ‘Whatever happened to the philosophy of science?’ Comments on Barnes. Environment and Planning A26, 337–342.
8.
Bassett, K.1995: On reflexivity: further comments on Barnes and the sociology of science. Environment and Planning A27, 1527–1533.
9.
Bassett, K.1996: Postmodernism and the crisis of the intellectual: reflections on reflexivity, universities and the scientific field. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14, 507–527.
10.
Bernstein, R.1991: The new constellation. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Bhaskar, R.1978: A realist theory of science. Brighton: Harvester Press.
12.
Bhaskar, R.1985: Scientific realism and human emancipa tion. London: Verso.
13.
Bhaskar, R.1991: Philosophy and the idea of freedom. Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
Bicchieri, C.1988: Should a scientist abstain from metaphor? In Klamer, A., McCloskey, D. and Solow, R., editors, The consequences of economic rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Blaug, M.1980: The methodology of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Bohman, J.1991: New philosophy of social science. Oxford: Polity Press.
17.
Bourdieu, P. and Waquant, L.1992: An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Boyd, R.1979: Metaphors and theory change. In Ortony, A., editor, Metaphor and thought, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 356–408.
19.
Boyd, R.1992: Constructivism, realism and scientific method. In Earman, J., editor Inference, explanation, and other frustrations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 131–198.
20.
Brown, J.1989: The rational and the social. Andover: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
21.
Callon, M.1994: Four models for the dynamics of science. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J. and Pinch, T., editors, Handbook of science and technology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 29–63.
22.
Cartwright, N.1983: How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23.
Cartwright, N.1989: Nature's capacities and their measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24.
Collins, H.1981: Stages in the empirical p rogramme of relativism. Social Studies of Science12, 3–10.
25.
Collins, H. and Yearley, S.1992: Epistemological chicken. In Pickering, A., editor, Science as practice and culture, London: University of Chicago Press, 301–326.
26.
Couvalis, G.1997: The philosophy of science. New York: Sage.
27.
de Marchi, N.1993: Introduction: rethinking Lakatos. In de Marchi, N. and Blaug, M., editors, Appraising economic theories, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1–34.
28.
Demeritt, D.1996: Social theory and the recons t ruction of science and geography. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS 21, 484–503.
29.
Dupre, J.1996: Metaphysical disorder and scientific disunity. In Galison, P. and Stump, D. editors, The disunity of science, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 101–117.
30.
Farrell, F.1994: Subjectivity, realism and post-modernism – the recovery of the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Fay, B.1996: Contemporary philosophy of social science. Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
Fuller, S.1988: Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.
33.
Galison, P.1995: Context and constraint. In Buchwald, J., editor,Scientific practice, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 13–41.
34.
Geras, N.1995: Solidarity in the conversation of humankind. London: Verso.
35.
Gingras, Y.1995: Following scientists through society? Yes, but at arm's length! In Buchwald, Z., editor,Scientific practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 123–150.
36.
Haack, S.1987: Surprising noises: Rorty and Hesse on metaphor, P roceedings of the Aristotelian Society NS 88, 179–187.
37.
Haack, S.1994: ‘Dry truth and real knowledge’: epistemologies of metaphor and metaphors of epistemology.’ In Hintikka, J., editor,Aspects of metaphor, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1–22.
38.
Hacking, I.1983: Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Hacking, I.1992: The self-vindication of the laboratory science. In Pickering, A., editor, Science as practice and culture, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 29–64.
40.
Hands, D.1991: The problem of excess content: economics, novelty and a long Popperian tale. In De Marchi, N. and Blaug, M., editors, Appraising economic theories, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 58–75.
41.
Hands, D.1993: The Popperian tradition in economic methodology: should it be saved? In Hands, D., editor,Testing, rationality and progress, Lanham, MD: Littlefield Publishers.
42.
Hands, D.1995: Social epistemology meets the invisible hand: Kitcher on the advancement of science. Canadian Philosophical Review: DialogueXXXIV, 605–621.
43.
Harding S.1991: Whose science? Whose knowledge?Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
44.
Harding S.1993a: Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightenment critiques. In Nicholson, L., editor, Feminism/postmodernism, London: Routledge, 83–106.
45.
Harding S.1993b: Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is strong objectivity? In Alcoff, L. and Potter, M., editors, Feminist epistemologies, Edinburgh: Routledge, 49–82.
46.
Harvey, D.1969: Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
47.
Hausman, D.1992: The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Hess, D.1997: Science studies: an advanced intro duction. New York: New York University Press.
49.
Hesse, M.1993: Models, metaphors and truth. In Ankersmit, F. and Mooij, J., editors, Knowledge and language. Volume III. Metaphor and Knowledge, Dord recht: Kluwer Academic, 49–65.
50.
Hoyningen-Huene, P., Oberheim, E. and Andersen, H.1996: On incommensurability. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science27, 131–141.
51.
Johnston, R.1986: On human geography. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
Johnston, R.1997: Geography and geographers. Arnold: London.
53.
Jones, M.1996: Posthuman agency: between theoretical traditions. Sociological Theory14, 290–309.
54.
Kitcher, P.1993: The advancement of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
Kuhn, T.1970: The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Lakatos, I.1970: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., editors, Criticism and the growth of knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–196.
57.
Latour, B.1988a: The politics of explanation: an alternative. In Woolgar, S., editor,Knowledge and reflexivity: frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, London: Sage, 155–176.
58.
Latour, B.1988b: The pasteurisation of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
59.
Latour, B.1992: One more turn after the social turn. In McMullin, E., editor,The social dimensions of science, Notre Dame, NI: University of Notre Dame Press, 272–294.
60.
Latour, B.1993: We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.1979: Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
62.
Laudan, L.1977: Progress and its problems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
63.
Laudan, L.1990: Science and relativism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Levy, B.1996: Theory choice and the comparison of rival theoretical perspectives in political sociology.Philosophy of the Social Sciences26, 26–60.
65.
Longino, H.1990: Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
Lovibond, S.1992: Feminism and pragmatism: a reply to Richard Rorty.New Left Review193, 56–74.
67.
Lowe, M. and Short, J.1990: Progressive human geography.Progress in Human Geography14, 1–11.
68.
Mair, A.1986: Thomas Kuhn and understanding geography.Progress in Human Geography10, 345–370.
69.
Maki, U.1991: Comment on Hands. In de Marchi, N. and Blaug, M., editors, Appraising economic theories, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
70.
Malone, M.1993: Kuhn reconstructed: incommensurability without relativism. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science24, 69–93.
71.
Marshall, J.1985: Geography as a scientific enterprise. In Johnston, R.J., editor,The future of geography, London: Methuen.
72.
Miller, R.1987: Fact and method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
Mirowski, P.1990: More heat than light: economics as social physics, physics as nature's economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Mooij, J.1993: Metaphors and truth: a liberal approach. In Ankersmit, F. and Mooij, J., editors, Knowledge and language. Volume III. Metaphor and knowledge, Dord recht: Kluwer Academic, 67–80.
75.
Murdoch, J.1997: Inhuman/nonhuman/human: actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15, 633–799.
76.
Nanda, M.1997: Restoring the real: rethinking social constructivist theories of science. In Panitch, L., editor, Socialist register 1997, London: Merlin Press, 302–352.
77.
Newton-Smith, W.1981: The rationality of science. London: Routledge.
78.
Nielsen, K.1991: After the demise of the tradition: Rorty, critical theory and the fate of philosophy. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
79.
Niiniluoto, I.1991: Realism, relativism and constructivism. Synthese89, 135–162.
80.
Pickering, A.1984: Constructing quarks: a sociolog ical history of particle physics. Edinburg h : Edinburgh University Press.
81.
Pickering, A.1995: The mangle of practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
Pinch T. and Pinch T.1988: Reservations about reflexivity and new literary forms, or why let the devil have all the good tunes? In Woolgar, S., editor,Knowledge and reflexivity, London: Sage, 178–199.
83.
Popper, K.1963: Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.
84.
Prado, C.1987: The limits to pragmatism. New Jersey: Humanities Press International.
85.
Radder, H.1992: Normative reflections on cons t ructivist approaches to science and technology.Social Studies of Science22, 141–173.
86.
Resnick, D.1996: Social epistemology and the ethics of research. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science27, 565–586.
87.
Rorty, R.1982: Consequence of pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
88.
Rorty, R.1989: Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89.
Rorty, R.1991a: Objectivity, relativism and truth: philosophical papers. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90.
Rorty, R.1991b: Feminism and pragmatism. Radical Philsophy59, 3–13.
91.
Roth, P. and Barrett, R.1990: Deconstructing quarks. Social Studies of Science20, 579–632.
92.
Rule, J.1997: Theory and progress in social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
Sayer, A.1992: Method in social science: a realist approach. London: Routledge.
94.
Sayer, A.1995: Radical political economy: a critique. Oxford: Blackwell.
95.
Shapin, S.1995: Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology21, 289–321.
96.
Simovitz, R. and Price, B.1990: The expected utility theory of conflict: measuring theoretical progress. American Political Science Review34, 439–460.
97.
Sismondo, S.1993: Some social constructions. Social Studies of Science23, 515–530.
98.
Solomon, M.1995: Legend naturalism and scientific pro g ress: and essay on Philip Kitcher's ‘The Advancement of Science’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science26, 205–218.
99.
Wheeler, P.1982: Revolutions, research programmes and human geography.Area14, 1–6.
100.
Williams, B.1983: Auto-da-Fe. New York Review of Books, 28 April.
101.
Woolgar, S.1988: Reflexivity is the ethnographer of the text. In Woolgar, S., editor,Knowledge and reflexivity: frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 14–34.
102.
Yeung, H.1997: Critical realism and realist research in human geography: a method or a philosophy in search of a method?Progress in Human Geography21, 51–74.
