Abramson, A.J. and Tobin, M.S.1995: The changing geography of metropolitan opportunity: the segregation of the poor in US metropolitan areas, 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate6, 45–72.
2.
Atkinson, A.B., Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T.M.1995: Income distribution in OECD countries: evidence from the Luxembourg income study. Social Policies Studies 18. Paris: OECD.
Badcock, B.A.1995: Towards more equitable cities: a receding prospect? In Troy, P., editor, Australian Cities. Issues, strategies and policies for urban Australia in the 1990s, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 196–219.
5.
Badcock, B.A.1996: ‘Looking-glass’ views of the city. Progress in Human Geography20, 91–99.
6.
Bagguley, P. and Mann, K.1992: Idle thieving bastards? Scholarly representations of the ‘underclass’. Work, Employment and Society6, 113–126.
7.
Barclay, P.1995: Inquiry into income and wealth. Vol. 1. York: Rowntree Foundation.
8.
Bluestone, B. and Harrison, B.1982: The deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Boddy, M., Bridge, G., Burton, P. and Gordon, D.1995: Socio-demographic change and the inner city (for the Department of Environment). London: HMSO.
10.
Bourne, L.S. 1995: Social polarization and spatial segregation: the changing distribution of income inequalities in Canadian cities. Paper presented to the IGU Commission on Urban Life meeting in Cape Town, August.
11.
Bradford, M.G., Robson, B.T. and Tye, R.1995: Constructing an urban deprivation index: a way of meeting the need for flexibility. Environment and Planning A27, 519–533.
12.
Brooks, C.W.1995: Perennial issues for governments. Urban Futures19, 107–108 (special issue. Selected papers from the Australia-OECD conference Cities and the New Global Economy, Melbourne, November 1994).
13.
Bryan, R.1995: The chase across the globe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
Buck, N. 1994: Social divisions and labour market change in London: national urban and global factors. Unpublished paper for ESRC London seminar, 28 October.
15.
Budd, L.1995: Globalisation, territory and strategic alliances in different financial centres. Urban Studies32, 345–361.
16.
Burbidge, A. and Winter, I.1996: Investigating urban poverty: the impact of state intervention and household change. Urban Policy and Research14, 97–108.
17.
Burgers, J.1996: No polarization in Dutch cities? Inequality in a corporatist country. Urban Studies33, 99–105.
18.
Clark, W.A.V. and McNicholas, M.1995: Reexamining economic and social polarization in a multi-ethnic metropolitan area: the case of Los Angeles. Area28, 56–63.
19.
Coombes, M., Raybould, S. and Wong, C.1992: Developing indicators to assess the potential for urban regeneration (Department of the Environment Inner Cities Directorate). London: HMSO.
20.
Davis, M.1990: City of quartz. Excavating the future in Los Angeles. New York: Verso.
21.
Department of Social Security1993: Meeting the challenge – labour market trends and the income support system. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
22.
Dicken, P.1992: Global shift. The internationalization of economic activity (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
Dieleman, F. and Hamnett, C.1994: Globalisation, regulation and the urban system. Urban Studies31, 357–364.
24.
Dobrzynski, J.H.1996: The new jobs: a growing number are good ones. New York Times 21 July, section 3 1, 10–11.
25.
Esping-Andersen, G.1990: The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
Fagan, R. and Webber, M.1994: Global restructuring. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
27.
Fainstein, S.S., Gordon, I. and Harloe, M., editors, 1992: Divided cities. New York and London in the contemporary world. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
Fieldhouse, E.A. and Tye, B.1996: Deprived people or deprived places? Exploring the ecological fallacy in studies of deprivation with the samples of Anonymised Records. Environment and Planning A28, 237–260.
29.
Fieleke, N.S.1994: Is global competition making the poor even poorer?New England Economic Review. November/December, 3–15.
30.
Fincher, R. 1996: Gender and urban poverty: new debates in Australia. Paper presented to the IGU congress, The Hague, 1–5 August.
31.
Firestone, D.1996: New York costs for its program seen as surging. The New York Times 1 August, 1-1.
32.
Forster, C.1995: Australian cities. Continuity and change. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
33.
Frey, W.H. and Fielding, E.L.1995: Changing urban populations: regional restructuring, racial polarization and poverty concentration. Cityscape2-2.
34.
Gans, H.1993: From ‘underclass’ to ‘undercaste’: some observations about the future of the postindustrial economy and its major victims. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17, 327–335.
35.
Goldsmith, M. and Blakely, E.1993: Separate societies: poverty and inequality in US cities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
36.
Green, A.1994: The geography of poverty and wealth. Coventry: Institute for Employment Research.
37.
Gregory, R.G.1993: Aspects of Australian living standards: the disappointing decades 1970–1990. Economic Record69, 61–76.
38.
Gregory, R.G. and Hunter, B.1995a: The macroeconomy and the growth of ghettos and urban poverty in Australia. Discussion Paper 325. Canberra: Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.
39.
Gregory, R.G.1995b: Further remarks on increased neighbourhood inequality. Social Security Journal June, 20–28.
40.
Hamnett, C.1994a: Social polarisation in global cities: theory and evidence. Urban Studies31, 401–424.
41.
Hamnett, C.1994b: Socio-economic change in London: professionalization not polarization. Built Environment20, 192–203.
42.
Hamnett, C.1996: Why Sassen is wrong: a response to Burgers. Urban Studies33, 107–110.
43.
Hanson, S. and Pratt, G.1995: Gender, work and space. London and New York: Routledge.
44.
Harding, A. 1995: Trends in income distribution in Australia. Paper presented to the Department of Housing and Regional Development seminar on Spatial Aspects of Inequality, October.
45.
Harvey, D.W.1989: The condition of post-modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
Herbert, B.1996: But what’s this about Kemp being good news for cities?International Herald Tribune 13 August, 8-8.
47.
Hunter, B.1995: Is there an Australian underclass?Urban Futures18, 14–25.
48.
Iceland, J. 1996: Urban labor markets and individual transitions out of poverty. Paper presented to the Population Association Meeting, New Orleans.
49.
Johnson, J.H., Oliver, M.L. and Bobo, L.D.1994: Understanding the contours of deepening urban inequality: theoretical underpinnings and research design of a multi-city study. Urban Geography15, 77–89.
50.
Jolly, R.1996: The human development report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
Kasarda, J.D.1993: Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighbourhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate4, 253–302.
52.
Kasarda, J.D. and Ting, K.1996: Joblessness and poverty in America’s central cities: causes and policy prescriptions. Housing Policy Debate7, 387–419.
53.
Kesteloot, C.1994: Three levels of socio-spatial polarization in Brussels. Built Environment20, 204–217.
54.
King, A.D.1991: Global cities. Post-imperialism and the internationalization of London. London: Routledge.
55.
Kloosterman, R.C. and Lambooy, J.G.1992: The Randstad – a welfare region? In Dieleman, F.M. and Musterd, S., editors, The Randstad: a research and policy laboratory, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 123–139.
56.
Knox, P.L. and Taylor, P.J., editors, 1995: World cities in a world-system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Kobayashi, A., editor, 1994: Women, work and place. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
58.
Krugman, P.1995: Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laws, G.1996: Dismantling the welfare state in the 1990s. Environment and Planning A28, 1–10.
61.
Lee, P.1994: Housing and spatial deprivation: relocating the underclass and the new urban poor. Urban Studies31, 1191–1209.
62.
Lee, P. and Murie, A. 1996: The poor city: national and local perspectives on changes in residential patterns in the British city. Paper presented to the Workshop on the Partitioned City, Dessau, 16–18 May.
63.
Marcuse, P.1989: Gentrification, homelessness and the work process: housing markets and labour markets in the quartered city. Housing Studies4, 211–220.
64.
Marcuse, P.1996: Is Australia different? Globalization and the new urban poverty. Occasional Paper 3. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
65.
Massey, D.S. and Denton, N.1993: American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
Mingione, E., editor, 1995: The new urban poverty. London and Oxford: Blackwell.
67.
Mollenkopf, J. and Castells, M., editors, 1991: Dual city. The restructuring of New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
68.
Murie, A.1994: Cities and housing after the welfare state. Amsterdam: Study Centre for the Metropolitan Environment, University of Amsterdam.
69.
Murie, A. and Musterd, S.1996: Social segregation, housing tenure and social change in Dutch cities in the late 1980s. Urban Studies33, 495–516.
70.
Murphy, P. and Watson, S.1994: Social polarisation and Australian cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18, 573–590.
71.
Murray, C.1984: Losing ground. New York: Basic Books.
72.
Musterd, S.1994: A rising European underclass?Built Environment20, 185–191.
73.
Musterd, S. and Ostendorf, W., editors, 1997: Urban segregation and social exclusion in western welfare states. London: Routledge.
74.
Neef, R.1992: The new poverty and local government social policies: a West German perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16, 202–221.
75.
Newman, K.S.1995: Dead-end jobs. A way out. The Brookings Review13, 24–27.
76.
OECD1996: Growth, equity and distribution. Economic Outlook60, 36–42.
77.
OECD Group on Urban Affairs1994: Terms of reference for the project group on distressed urban areas. Paris: OECD.
78.
O’Hare, W.P.1996: A new look at poverty in America. Population Bulletin51, 2-2.
79.
O’Loughlin, J. and Friedrichs, J., editors, 1996: Social polarization in post-industrial metropolises. New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
80.
Pacione, M.1995: The geography of multiple deprivation in the Clydeside conurbation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie86, 407–425.
81.
Peach, C.1996: Does Britain have ghettos?Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS21, 216–235.
82.
Peel, M.1995: Good times, hard times. The past and the future in Elizabeth. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
83.
Philpott, J.1994: The incidence and cost of unemployment. In Glyn, A. and Miliband, D., editors, Paying for inequality: the economic cost of social injustice, London: Institute of Public Policy Research, 130–144.
84.
Porter, M.E.1990: The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
85.
Porter, M.E.1995: The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review May–June, 55–71.
86.
Probert, B.1990: Globalisation, economic restructuring and the state. In Bell, S. and Head, B., editors, State, economy and public policy in Australia, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 98–118.
87.
Raskall, P. 1995: Who gets what where? Spatial inequality between and within Australian cities. Paper presented to the Department of Housing and Regional Development seminar on Spatial Inequality, Canberra.
88.
Reich, R.B.1991: The work of nations. New York:Alfred A. Knopf.
89.
Robson, B., Bradford, M.G. and Tye, R.1995: Part 2. A matrix of deprivation in English authorities 1991. In Department of the Environment, 1991 deprivation index: a review of approaches and a matrix of results, London: HMSO, 69–138.
90.
Room, G.1990: New poverty in the European Community. London: Macmillan.
91.
Sassen, S.1991: The global city. New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
92.
Sassen, S.1994: Cities in the world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
93.
Saunders, P.1994: Welfare and inequality. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
94.
Schill, M.W. and Wachter, S.M.1994: The spatial bias of federal housing programs. Research Impact Paper 3. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Real Estate Center.
95.
Smith, D.J., editor, 1992: Understanding the underclass. London: Policy Studies Institute.
96.
Stilwell, F. 1996: ‘Globalisation’: reshaping Australian cities? Paper presented to the International Sociological Association conference on new Urban Forms, New Housing Forms, Brisbane, July.
97.
Thomas, R.1996: Blair offers little comfort to poor. Guardian Weekly, 21 April, 14-14.
98.
US Census Bureau1996: A brief look at postwar US income inequality. Washington, DC: Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
99.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development1995: The Clinton Administration’s national urban policy report (July). Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research.
100.
van Kempen, E.T.1994: The dual city and the poor: social polarisation, social segregation and life chances. Urban Studies31, 995–1015.
101.
Warf, B.1990: Deindustrialization, service sector growth, and the underclass in the New York metropolitan region. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie81, 332–347.
102.
Warf, B. and Erickson, R.1996: Introduction: globalization and the US city system. Urban Geography17, 1–4.
103.
White, R.1996: No-go in the fortress city: young people, inequality and space. Urban Policy and Research14, 37–50.
104.
Whiteford, P.1995: Does Australia have a ghetto underclass?Social Security Journal June, 6–19.
105.
Wilson, W.J.1987: The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
106.
Wolfson, M.C.1994: Divergent inequalities: theory, empirical results and prescriptions. Research Paper Series 60. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
107.
Woodward, R.1995: Approaches towards the study of social polarization in the UK. Progress in Human Geography19, 75–89.
