In recent years, the French regulation approach has heavily infiltrated the research agendas of the social sciences. This has been particularly conspicuous in economic geography, urban and regional analysis and political economy. Within these subdisciplines, some new research inquiries have departed from the original ‘first generation’ concern with economic crisis to analyse a range of issues such as the state form, and local and regional governance. This article reviews several of the more promising analyses which have consciously sought to fill some ‘missing links’ in the ongoing regulationist research project, and which have considerably enhanced our undertaking of the contemporary regulatory milieu. These post-Parisian themes have focused on the process of regulation and its discursive and political constitution; the geography of regulation and spatial scale; and the role of the state in and through the regulatory process. The article concludes with some implications for applying this emergent regulationist agenda to empirically informed research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aglietta, M.1979: A theory of capitalist regulation. London: Verso.
2.
Aglietta, M.1982: World capitalism in the 1980s. New Left Review136, 5–41.
3.
Albrechts, L. and Swyngedouw, E.1989: The challenges for regional policy under a flexible regime of accumulation. In Albrechts, L., Moulaert, F., Roberts, P. and Swyngedouw, E., editors, Regional policy at the crossroads: European perspectives, London: Jessica Kingsley, 67–89.
4.
Allen, J. and Massey, D., editors, 1988: The economy in question: restructuring Britain. London: Sage.
5.
Althusser, L.1969: For Marx. London: Verso.
6.
Altvater, E.1992: The Fordist and post-Fordist international division of labour and monetary regimes. In Storper, M. and Scott, A.J., editors, Pathways to industrialisation and regional development, London: Routledge, 21–45.
7.
Amin, A.1994a: Post-Fordism: models, fantasies and phantoms of transition. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 1–39.
8.
Amin, A.1994b: Post-Fordism: a reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Amin, A. and Robins, K.1990: The re-emergence of regional economies? The mythical geography of flexible accumulation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space8, 7–24.
10.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N.1992: Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16, 571–587.
11.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N.1994: Living in the global. In Amin, A. and Thrift, N., editors, Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–19.
12.
Amin, A. and Tomaney, J. 1993: The regional dilemma in a neo-liberal Europe. Paper presented at the International Seminar on ‘Geographies of inequality in a post-Maastricht Europe’, Syros, Greece.
13.
Bakshi, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J. and Southern, A.1995: Gender, race and class in the local welfare state: moving beyond regulation theory in analysing the transition from Fordism. Environment and Planning A27, 1539–1554.
14.
Barbrook, R.1990: Mistranslations: Lipietz in London and Paris. Science as Culture 8.
15.
Benko, G. and Dunford, M., editors, 1991: Industrial change and regional development: the transformation of new industrial spaces. London: Belhaven Press.
16.
Bertramsen, R.1991: From the capitalist state to the political economy. In Bertramsen, R., Thomsen, J.P.F. and Torfing, J., editors, State economy and society, London: Unwin Hyman, 94–145.
17.
Best, M.1990: The new competition: institutions of industrial restructuring. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
Bonefeld, W.1987: The reformulation of state theory. Capital and Class33, 96–127.
19.
Bonefeld, W.1993: Crisis of theory: Bob Jessop's theory of capitalist reproduction. Capital and Class50, 25–47.
20.
Bonefeld, W. and Holloway, J., editors, 1991: Post-Fordism and social form. London: Macmillan.
21.
Bourdieu, P.1977: Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
Boyer, R.1979: Wage formation in historical perspective: the French experience. Cambridge Journal of Economics3, 99–118.
23.
Boyer, R.1988: Technical change and the theory of ‘regulation’. In Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L., editors, Technical change and economic theory, London: Pinter, 67–94.
24.
Boyer, R.1990: The regulation school; a critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Boyer, R.1991: The transformation of modern capitalism: by the light of the ‘regulation’ approach and other political economy theories Report 9134. Paris: CEPREMAP.
26.
Brenner, R. and Glick, M.1991: Regulation approach: theory and history. New Left Review188, 45–119.
27.
Burrows, R. and Loader, B., editors, 1994: Towards a post-Fordist welfare state. London: Routledge.
28.
Burton, P. and O'Toole, M.1993: Urban development corporations: post-Fordism in action or Fordism in retrenchment? In Imrie, R. and Thomas, H., editors, British urban policy and urban development corporations, London: Paul Chapman, 186–199.
29.
Clarke, J.1995: Towards a post-Fordist welfare state? Review article. Local Government Studies11, 637–644.
30.
Clarke, S.1988: Overaccumulation, class struggle, and the regulation approach. Capital and Class36, 59–92.
31.
Clarke, S., editor, 1991: The State debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
32.
Cochrane, A.1993: Whatever happened to local government?Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
33.
Cooke, P. and Morgan, K.1993: The network paradigm. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11, 543–564.
34.
Cooke, P., Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E. and Weinstein, O., editors, 1992: Towards global localisation: the computing and communication industries in Britain and France. London: UCL Press.
35.
Cox, K.1993: The local and the global in the new urban politics: a critical view. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11, 433–448.
36.
Cox, K. and Mair, A.1991: From localised social structures to localities as agents. Environment and Planning A23, 197–213.
37.
De Vroey, M.1984: A regulation approach interpretation of the contemporary crisis. Capital and Class23, 45–66.
38.
Dicken, P.1992: Global shift: the internationalization of economic activity (2nd edn). London: Paul Chapman.
39.
Drache, D. and Gertler, M., editors, 1991: The new era of global competition: state policy and market power. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
40.
Dunford, M.1990: Theories of regulation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space8, 297–322.
41.
Dunford, M. and Benko, G., editors, 1991: Industrial change and regional development: the transformation of new industrial spaces. London: Pinter.
42.
Dunford, M. and Kafkalas, G., editors, 1992: Cities and regions in the new Europe: global–local interplay and spatial development strategies. London: Belhaven Press.
43.
Dunford, M. and Perrons, D.1983: The arena of capital. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
44.
Elam, M.1994: Puzzling out the post-Fordist debate; technology, markets and institutions. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 43–70.
45.
Entrikin, N.1994: Place and region. Progress in Human Geography18, 227–233.
46.
Esser, J. and Hirsch, J.1994: The crisis of Fordism and the dimensions of a ‘post-Fordist’ regional and urban structure. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 71–97.
47.
Florida, R. and Jonas, A.1991: US urban policy: the postwar state and capitalist regulation. Antipode23, 349–384.
48.
Gertler, M.1988: The limits to flexibility: comments on the post-Fordist vision of production and its geography. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers13, 419–432.
49.
Gertler, M.1992: Flexibility revisited: districts, nation states and the forces of production. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers17, 259–278.
50.
Gertler, M.1993: Definition of ‘regime of accumulation’. In Johnston, R., Gregory, D. and Smith, D., editors, Dictionary of human geography, Oxford: Blackwell, 506-506.
51.
Gertler, M. 1996: The invention of regional culture. Paper presented to the Association of American Geographers' conference, Charlotte, NC.
52.
Giddens, A.1984: The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
53.
Goodwin, M., Cloke, P. and Milbourne, P.1995: Regulation theory and rural research: theorising contemporary rural change. Environment and Planning A27, 1245–1260.
54.
Goodwin, M., Duncan, S. and Halford, S.1993: Regulation theory, the local state and the transition of urban politics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11, 67–88.
55.
Goodwin, M. and Painter, J.1996: Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers21, 635–648.
56.
Gramsci, A.1971: Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
57.
Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, R., editors, 1992: The sociology of economic life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
58.
Hall, S.1988: The hard road to renewal. London: Verso.
59.
Hall, S. and Jacques, M., editors, 1989: New times: the changing face of politics in the 1990s. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
60.
Harvey, D.1982: The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
61.
Harvey, D.1989a: The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
62.
Harvey, D.1989b: The urban experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
63.
Harvey, D. and Scott, A.J.1989: The practice of human geography: theory and empirical specificity in the transition from Fordism to flexible accumulation. In MacMillan, B., editor, Remodelling geography, Oxford: Blackwell, 217–229.
64.
Hausmann, R. and Lipietz, A.1980: Esoteric vs. exoteric economic laws: the forgotten dialectic. Paris: CEPREMAP Série Orange.
65.
Hay, C.1993: Bob Jessop's strategic-relational approach: towards a Marxism beyond pessimism. Mimeograph, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
66.
Hay, C.1995: Re-stating the problem of regulation and re-regulating the local state. Economy and Society24, 287–407.
67.
Hay, C.1996: Re-stating social and political change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
68.
Hay, C. and Jessop, B.1995: Introduction: local political economy: regulation and governance. Economy and Society24, 303–306.
69.
Hendry, N.1992: The new industrial spaces: the locational logic of a new production era?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16, 375–396.
70.
Hirsch, J.1983: The Fordist security state and new social movements. Kapitalistate10/11, 75–87.
71.
Hirsch, J.1991: From the Fordist to the post-Fordist state. In Jessop, B., Kastendiek, H., Nielson, K. and Pedersen, O., editors, The politics of flexibility, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 67–81.
72.
Hirst, P. and Zeitlin, J.1991: Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications. Economy and Society20, 1–56.
73.
HMSO1965: The national plan (Cmnd 2764), London.
74.
HMSO1994: Competitiveness: helping business to win (Cm 2563), London.
75.
Hudson, R.1988: Labour market changes and new forms of work in old industrial regions. In Massey, D. and Allen, J., editors, Uneven redevelopment, Milton Keynes: Hodder & Stoughton.
76.
Jenson, J.1989: Paradigms and political discourse: legislation in France and the United States before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science22, 235–258.
77.
Jenson, J.1990: Representations in crisis: the roots of Canada's permeable Fordism. Canadian Journal of Political Science23, 653–683.
78.
Jenson, J.1993a: Naming nations: making nationalist claims in Canadian public discourse. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology30, 337–358.
79.
Jenson, J.1993b: Ideas, spaces and times in Canadian political economy. In Jenson, J., Mahon, R. and Bienefeld, M., editors, Production, space, identity: political economy faces the 21st century, Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press, 143–169.
80.
Jenson, J.1995: Mapping, naming and remembering: globalization at the end of the twentieth century. Review of International Political Economy2, 96–116.
81.
Jenson, J., Mahon, R. and Bienefeld, M., editors, 1993: Production, space, identity: political economy faces the 21st century, Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
82.
Jessop, B.1982: The capitalist state: Marxist theories and methods. Oxford: Robertson.
83.
Jessop, B.1985: Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist theory and political strategy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
84.
Jessop, B.1988: Regulation theory, post-Fordism, and the state: more than a reply to Werner Bonefeld. Capital and Class34, 147–169.
85.
Jessop, B.1990a: Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society19, 153–216.
86.
Jessop, B.1990b: State theory: putting capitalist states in their place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
87.
Jessop, B.1991: On the originality, legacy, and actuality of Nicos Poulantzas. Studies in Political Economy34, 75–106.
88.
Jessop, B.1992a: Fordism and post-Fordism: a critical reformulation. In Storper, M. and Scott, A.J., editors, Pathways to industrialisation and regional development, London: Routledge, 46–69.
89.
Jessop, B.1992b: Post-Fordism and flexible specialisation: incommensurable, contradictory, or just plain different perspectives? In Ernste, H. and Meier, V., editors, Regional development and contemporary industrial response: extending flexible specialisation, London: Belhaven Press, 25–43.
90.
Jessop, B.1992c: Regulation and politics: the integral economy and the integral state. Mimeograph, Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster.
91.
Jessop, B.1993: Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on a post-Fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy40, 7–39.
92.
Jessop, B.1994: Post-Fordism and the state. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 253–279.
93.
Jessop, B.1995a: The future of the nation state: erosion or reorganisation? Lancaster Regionalism Group Working Papers (Governance Series) 50. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
94.
Jessop, B.1995b: The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change?Economy and Society24, 307–333.
95.
Jessop, B.1995c: Towards a Schumpeterian workfare regime in Britain? Reflections on regulation, governance, and the welfare state. Environment and Planning A27, 1613–1626.
96.
Jessop, B. 1996a: The entrepreneurial city: re-imaging localities, re-designing economic governance, or re-structuring capital? Paper presented to the conference of the Institute of British Geographers, January.
97.
Jessop, B.1997: A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects, and governance. In Lauria, M., editor, Reconstructing urban regime theory, London: Sage, 51–73.
98.
Jessop, B., Bonnett, K., Bromley, S. and Ling, T.1988: Thatcherism: a tale of two nations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
99.
Jones, M.1997: Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. Environment and Planning A29, 831–864.
100.
Keating, M.1993: The politics of local economic development: political change and local development policies in the US, Britain and France. Urban Affairs Quarterly28, 376–396.
101.
Leborgne, D. and Lipietz, A.1992: Conceptual fallacies and open questions on post-Fordism. In Storper, M. and Scott, A.J., editors, Pathways to industrialisation and regional development, London: Routledge, 332–348.
102.
Leys, C.1990: Still a question of hegemony. New Left Review181, 119–128.
103.
Leyshon, A. and Tickell, A.1995: Money order? The discursive construction of Bretton Woods and the making and breaking of regulatory space. Environment and Planning A26, 1861–1890.
104.
Lipietz, A.1977: Le capital et son espace. Paris: Maspero.
105.
Lipietz, A.1980: Inter-regional polarisation and the tertiarisation of society. Papers of the Regional Science Association44, 3–17.
106.
Lipietz, A.1986: New tendencies in the international division of labour: regimes of accumulation and modes of regulation. In Scott, A.J. and Storper, M., editors, Production, work and territory: the geography of industrial capitalism, Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 16–40.
107.
Lipietz, A.1987a: Mirages and miracles. London: Verso.
108.
Lipietz, A.1987b: Rebel sons: the regulation school: an interview with Jane Jenson. French Politics and Society5, 3–17.
109.
Lipietz, A.1988: Reflections on a tale: the Marxist foundations of the concepts of ‘regulation’. Studies in Political Economy26, 7–36.
110.
Lipietz, A.1992: Towards a new economic order: postFordism, ecology and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
111.
Lipietz, A.1992b:The regulation approach and capitalist crisis: an alternative compromise for the 1990s. In Dunford, M. and Kafkalas, G., editors, Cities and regions in the new Europe: global–local interplay and spatial development strategies, London: Belhaven Press, 309–334.
112.
Lipietz, A.1993a: The local and the global: regional individuality or interregionalism. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers18, 8–18.
113.
Lipietz, A.1993b: From Althusserianism to ‘regulation theory’. In Kaplan, E.A. and Sprinker, M., editors, The Althusserian legacy, London: Verso, 99–138.
114.
Lipietz, A.1994a: Post-Fordism and democracy. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 339–357.
115.
Lipietz, A.1994b: The national and the regional: their autonomy vis-avis the capitalist world crisis. In Palan, R. and Gills, B., editors, Transcending the state–global divide: a neo-structuralist agenda in international relations, London: Lynne Reinner, 23–43.
116.
Lovering, J.1990: Fordism's unknown successor: a reply to Scott's theory of flexible accumulation and the re-emergence of regional economies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14, 159–174.
117.
Lovering, J.1995: Creating discourses rather than jobs: the crisis in the cities and the transition fantasies of intellectuals and policy makers. In Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A., editors, Managing cities: the new urban context, Chichester: Wiley.
118.
Mandel, E.1980: Longwaves of capitalist development: the Marxist interpretation. London: Cambridge University Press.
119.
Marsh, D.1995: State theory and the policy network model. Strathclyde Papers on Government 12. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
120.
Martin, R.1989: The reorganisation of regional theory: alternative perspectives on the changing capitalist space economy. Geoforum20, 187–201.
121.
Massey, D.1978: Regionalism: some current issues. Capital and Class6, 106–125.
122.
Massey, D.1984: Spatial divisions of labour. London: Macmillan.
123.
Mayer, M.1994: Post-Fordist city politics. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 316–337.
124.
McMichael, P. and Myhre, D.1991: Global regulation vs. the nation-state: agro-food systems and the new politics of capital. Capital and Class43, 83–106.
125.
Meegan, R.1988: A crisis of mass production? In Allen, J. and Massey, D., editors, The economy in question: restructuring Britain, London: Sage, 136–183.
126.
Moulaert, F.1996: Rediscovering spatial inequality in Europe: building blocks for an appropriate ‘regulationist’ analytical framework. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14, 155–179.
127.
Moulaert, F. and Swyngedouw, E.1989: A regulation approach to the geography of flexible production systems. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7, 327–345.
128.
Murray, R.1989: Fordism and post-Fordism. In Hall, S. and Jacques, M., editors, New times; the changing face of politics in the 1990s, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 38–53.
129.
Oberhauser, A.1990: Social and spatial patterns under Fordism and flexible accumulation. Antipode22, 211–232.
130.
Offe, C.1974: Structural problems of the capitalist state. German Political Studies1, 31–57.
131.
Offe, C.1975: The theory of the capitalist state and the problems of policy formation. In Lindberg, L., Alford, R., Crouch, C. and Offe, C., editors, Stress and contradiction in modern capitalism, London: Lexington Books, 125–143.
132.
Paasi, A.1991: Deconstructing regions: notes on the scales of spatial life. Environment and Planning A23, 239–256.
133.
Painter, J. 1992: Changing modes of regulation. Paper presented at the conference ‘Towards a post-Fordist welfare state’, University of Teeside.
134.
Painter, J.1997: Regulation, regime and practice in urban politics. In Lauria, M., editor, Reconstructing regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 122–143.
135.
Painter, J. and Goodwin, M.1995: Local governance and concrete research: investigating the uneven development of regulation. Economy and Society24, 334–356.
136.
Peck, J.1995: Moving and shaking: business élites, state localism and urban privatism. Progress in Human Geography19, 16–46.
137.
Peck, J. and Jones, M.1995: Training and Enterprise Councils: Schumpeterian workfare state, or what?Environment and Planning A27, 1361–1396.
138.
Peck, J. and Miyamachi, Y.1994: Regulating Japan? Regulation theory versus the Japan experience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12, 639–674.
139.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1992: Local modes of social regulation? Regulation theory, Thatcherism and uneven development. Geoforum23, 347–363.
140.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1994a: Searching for a new institutional fix: the after-Fordist crisis and global–local disorder. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 280–315.
141.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1994b: Too many partners... the future for regeneration partnerships. Local Economy9, 251–265.
142.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1995a: The social regulation of uneven development: ‘regulatory deficit’, England's south east, and the collapse of Thatcherism. Environment and Planning A27, 15–40.
143.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1995b: Business goes local: dissecting the business agenda in Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research19, 55–78.
144.
Perkmann, M.1996: Regulation theory and the role of politics. La lettre de la régulation16, 1–3.
145.
Poulantzas, N.1978: State, power, socialism. London: New Left Books.
146.
Reynolds, D.1994: Political geography: the power of place and the spatiality of politics. Progress in Human Geography18, 234–247.
147.
Rhodes, R.1995: The new governance: governing without government. Seminar II of the State of Britain Seminar Series. Swindon: ESRC.
148.
Sabel, C.1989: Flexible specialisation and the re-emergence of regional economies. In Hirst, P. and Zeitlin, J., editors, Reversing industrial decline? Industrial structure and policy in Britain and her competitors, Oxford: Berg, 17–70.
149.
Sacenian, A.-L.1994: Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
150.
Sayer, A.1989a: Postfordism in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research13, 666–695.
151.
Sayer, A.1989b: The new regional geography and the problem of narrative. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7, 253–276.
152.
Sayer, A.1992: Method in social science: a realist approach (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
153.
Sayer, A. and Walker, R.1992: The new social economy: re-working the division of labour. Oxford: Blackwell.
154.
Schoenberger, E.1988: From Fordism to flexible accumulation: technology, competitive strategies and international location. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6, 245–262.
155.
Scott, A.1988a: The new industrial spaces. London: Pion.
156.
Scott, A.1988b: Flexible production systems and regional development: the rise of new industrial spaces in North America and western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12, 171–185.
157.
Scott, A.1991: Flexible production systems: analytical tasks and theoretical horizons – a reply to Lovering. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research15, 130–134.
158.
Scott, A.1995: Regional motors of the global economy. Mimeograph, School of Public Policy and Social Research, University of California, Los Angeles.
159.
Scott, A.J. and Cooke, P.1988: Editorial: the new geography and sociology of production. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6, 241–244.
160.
Scott, A.J. and Storper, M., editors, 1986: Production, work and territory: the geography of industrial capitalism. Boston. MA: Allen & Unwin.
161.
Scott, A.J. and Storper, M., editors, 1992: Pathways to industrialisation and regional development. London: Routledge.
162.
Somers, M.1994: The narrative constitution of identity: a relational and network approach. Theory and Society23, 605–650.
163.
Stoker, G.1990: Regulation theory, local government and the transition from Fordism. In King, D. and Piere, J., editors, Challenges to local government, London: Sage, 242–264.
164.
Stoker, G.1995: Intergovernmental relations. Public Administration73, 101–122.
165.
Storper, M. and Scott, A.J.1989: The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In Wolch, J. and Dear, M., editors, The power of geography, London: Unwin Hyman, 19–40.
166.
Storper, M. and Scott, A.J.1992: Industrialisation and regional development. In Scott, A.J. and Storper, M., editors, Pathways to industrialisation and regional development, London: Routledge, 3–17.
167.
Storper, M. and Walker, R.1989: The capitalist imperative: territory, technology and industrial growth. New York: Blackwell.
168.
Sum, N.-L. 1994: Reflections on accumulation, regulation, the state and societalization: a stylized model of east Asian capitalism and an integral analysis of Hong Kong. PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
169.
Thomsen, F.1991: A strategic-relational account of economic state interventions. In Bertramsen, R., Thomsen, J.P.F. and Torfing, J., editors, State economy and society, London: Unwin Hyman.
170.
Thornley, A., editor, 1993: The crisis of London. London: Routledge.
171.
Thrift, N.1983: On the determination of social action in space and time. Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space1, 23–57.
Tickell, A. and Peck, J.1992: Accumulation, regulation, and the geographies of post-Fordism: missing links in regulationist research. Progress in Human Geography16, 190–218.
174.
Torfing, J.1991: A hegemony approach to capitalist regulation. In Bertramsen, R., Thomsen, J.P.F. and Torfing, J., editors, State economy and society, London: Unwin Hyman.
175.
Yeung, H.-W.1994: Critical reviews of geographical perspectives on business organisations and the organisation of production: towards a network approach. Progress in Human Geography18460–490.
