Acker, J.2005: Comments on Burawoy on Public Sociology. Critical Sociology31, 327-331.
2.
Aronowitz, S.2005: Comments on Michael Burawoy’s ‘The critical turn to public sociology’. Critical Sociology31, 333-338.
3.
Baiocchi, G.2005: Interrogating connections: from public criticisms to critical publics in Burawoy’s public sociology. Critical Sociology31, 339-351.
4.
Barnes, T.2001a: ‘In the beginning was economic geography’- a science studies approach to disciplinary history. Progress in Human Geography25, 521-544.
5.
Barnes, T.2001b: Lives lived and lives told: biographies of geography’s quantitative revolution. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19, 409-430.
6.
Barnes, T.2001c: Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the ‘cultural turn’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91, 546-565.
7.
Barnes, T.2003: The place of locational analysis: a selective and interpretative history. Progress in Human Geography27, 69-85.
8.
Brewer, R. M.2005: Response to Burawoy’s commentary: ‘The critical turn to public sociology’. Critical Sociology31, 353-359.
9.
Burawoy, M.1985: The politics of production: factory regimes under capitalism and socialism. London: Verso.
10.
Burawoy, M.2004a: Public sociologies: contradictions, dilemmas and possibilities. Social Forces82, 1-16.
11.
Burawoy, M. 2004b: The world needs public sociology. Paper presented at the Universities of Oslo, Bergen and Tromsø, 24 May-2 June 2004.
12.
Burawoy, M.2005a: The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology31, 313-326.
13.
Burawoy, M.2005b: 2004 presidential address: for public sociology. American Sociological Review70, 4-28.
14.
Burawoy, M., Blum, J. A., George, S., Gille, Z., Gowan, T., Haney, L., Klawiter, M., Lopez, S. H., Ó Rian, S. and Thayer, M.2000: Global ethnography: forces, connections and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. A. and Fox, K. J.1991: Ethnography unbound: power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
Burgess, J.2005: Follow the argument where it leads: some personal reflections on ‘policy-relevant’ research. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 30, 273-281.
17.
Castree, N.2000: What kind of critical geography for what kind of politics?Environment and Planning A32, 2091-2095.
Castree, N.2005: Forum: geography and environmental policy. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 30, 271-272.
21.
Dorling, D. and Shaw, M.2002: Geography off the agenda. Progress in Human Geography26, 629-646.
22.
Eden, S.2005: Green, gold and grey geography: legitimating academic and policy expertise. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 30, 282-286.
23.
Ghamari-Tabrizi, B.2005: Can Burawoy make everybody happy? Comments on public sociology. Critical Sociology31, 361-369.
24.
Gibson-Graham, J. K.2003: Enabling ethical economics: cooperativism and class. Critical Sociology29, 123-161.
25.
Jacoby, R.1987: The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.
26.
James, A., Gray, M. and Martin, R.2004: (Expanding) The role of geography in public policy. Environment and Planning A36, 1901-1905.
27.
Johnston, R. and Plummer, R.2005: What is policy-oriented research?Environment and Planning A37, 1521-1526.
28.
Johnston, R. J. and Sidaway, J. D.2004: Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945 (sixth edition). London: Arnold.
29.
Katz-Fishman, W. and Scott, J.2005: Comments on Burawoy: a view from the bottom-up. Critical Sociology31, 371-374.
30.
Martin, R.2001: Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography25, 189-210.
31.
Massey, D.2001: Geography on the agenda. Progress in Human Geography25, 5-17.
32.
Mitchell, K.2006: Writing from left field. Antipode, in press.
33.
Nielsen, F.2004: The vacant ‘we’: remarks on public sociology. Social Forces82, 1-9.
34.
Owens, S.2005: Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 30, 287-292.
35.
Pain, R.2004: Social geography: participatory research. Progress in Human Geography28, 652-663.
36.
Peck, J.1999: Editorial: grey geography. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 24, 131-135.
37.
Posner, R.2002: Public intellectuals: a study of decline. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Social Problems 2004: Public sociologies: a symposium from Boston College. Social Problems151, 103-130.
39.
Staeheli, L. A. and Mitchell, D.2005: The complex politics of relevance in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers95, 357-372.
40.
Tittle, C.2004: The arrogance of public sociology. Social Forces82, 1-6.
41.
Urry, J.2005: The good news and the bad news. Critical Sociology31, 375-378.
42.
Ward, K.2005: Public geographies and sociologies: definitions, discussions and divisions. Mimeograph, School of Environment and Development, The University of Manchester.