Among scholars of globalization and neoliberalism, there has been a marked turn away from the national as a relevant scale in today's world, with researchers arguing that the national is being `rescaled' to local, regional and global scales. This paper argues that we need to move beyond this rescaling argument to recognize that the national still is relevant in contemporary political economy. Seeing the national not as a discrete scale but as a dimension of political economic practice is an alternative analytical approach that treats the national as constitutively implicated in other scaled activities. Distinctions between one scale and another are not so clear. This approach enhances our understanding of contemporary patterns and processes because, instead of focusing on one set of scales or another, analysis can reveal relations among multiple scales. This approach also moves us beyond the historical periodization posited in the rescaling literature. Instead of providing descriptions of contemporary change in which the dominant national is giving way to a messier configuration of global and local scales, the idea of scales-as-dimensions offers a way of analysing scalar relations more generally. This can then be used in both contemporary and historical analysis. The rescaling argument treats the national largely as residual, which serves to draw our attention away from complex scalar practices without offering a truly different way of thinking about scalar relations.
Agnew, J.1994: The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory . Review of International Political Economy1, 53-80 .
2.
Agnew, J. and Corbridge, S.1995: Mastering space: hegemony, territory, and international political economy. London: Routledge .
3.
Brenner, N.1998: Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16, 459-481 .
4.
Brenner, N.1999: Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies . Theory and Society28, 39-78 .
5.
Brenner, N.2001: The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration . Progress in Human Geography25, 591-614 .
6.
Brenner, N. , Jessop, B. , Jones, M. and MacLeod, G.2003: Introduction: state space in question. In Brenner, N. , Jessop, B. , Jones, M. and MacLeod, G. , editors, State/space: a reader, Malden, MA: Blackwell , 1-26.
7.
Brenner, N. and Theodore, N.2002: Cities and the geographies of `actually existing neoliberalism' . Antipode34, 349-379 .
8.
Cameron, A. and Palan, R.2004: The imagined economies of globalization. London: Sage .
9.
Cerny, P.G.1999: Political globalization and the competition state. In Stubbs, R. and Underhill, G.R. , editors, Political economy and the changing global order, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 300-309.
10.
Cox, K.R.2002: `Globalization,' the `regulation approach,' and the politics of scale. In Herod, A. and Wright, M.W. , editors, Geographies of power: placing scale, Malden, MA: Blackwell , 85-114.
11.
Dijkink, G. and Knippenberg, H. , editors 2001: The territorial factor: political geography in a globalising world. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA .
12.
Glassman, J.1999: State power beyond the `territorial trap': the internationalization of the state . Political Geography18, 669-696 .
13.
Goodwin, M. and Painter, J.1996: Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS21, 635-648 .
14.
Harvey, D.2003: The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
15.
Hay, C.2000: Contemporary capitalism, globalization, regionalization and the persistence of national variation . Review of International Studies26, 509-531 .
16.
Held, D. , editor 2000: A globalizing world? Culture, economics, politics. London: Routledge .
17.
Held, D. and McGrew, A. , editors 2002: Governing globalization: power, authority, and global governance. Cambridge: Polity Press .
18.
Held, D. and McGrew, A. , editors 2003: The global transformations reader: an introduction to the globalization debate (Second edition). Cambridge: Polity Press .
19.
Held, D. , McGrew, A. , Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J.1999: Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press .
20.
Herod, A. and Wright, M.W.2002: Placing scale: an introduction. In Herod, A. and Wright, M.W. , editors, Geographies of power: placing scale, Malden, MA: Blackwell , 1-14.
21.
Howitt, R.2003: Scale. In Agnew, J. , Mitchell, K. and Toal, G. , editors, A companion to political geography, Malden, MA: Blackwell , 138-157.
22.
Hudson, R.2001: Producing places. New York: Guilford Press .
23.
Jessop, B.2002: The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press .
24.
Kofman, E.2003: Political geography and globalization as we enter the twenty-first century. In Kofman, E. and Youngs, G. , editors, Globalization: theory and practice, London: Continuum , 17-31.
25.
Larner, W.2000: Neo-liberalism, policy, ideology, governmentality . Studies in Political Economy63(Autumn), 5-25 .
26.
Larner, W.2003: Neoliberalism ? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21, 509-512 .
27.
Lechner, F. and Boli, J. , editors 2004: The globalization reader (Second edition). Malden, MA: Blackwell .
28.
Mansfield, B.2001a: Property regime or development policy? Explaining growth in the US Pacific groundfish fishery . Professional Geographer53, 384-397 .
29.
with erratum in 34(1).
30.
Mansfield, B.2003: Steller sea lion controversies: relations among science, regulation, and the fishing industry. New Orleans, LA: Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers .
31.
Mansfield, B.2004a: Neoliberalism in the oceans: `rationalization,' property rights, and the commons question . Geoforum35, 313-326 .
32.
Mansfield, B.2004b: Rules of privatization: contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries . Annals of the Association of American Geographers94, 565-584 .
33.
Marston, S.A.2000: The social construction of scale . Progress in Human Geography24, 219-242 .
34.
Marston, S.A. and Smith, N.2001: States, scales and households: limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner . Progress in Human Geography25, 615-619 .
35.
McGrew, A.2000: Power shift: from national government to global governance? In Held, D. , editor, A globalizing world? Culture, economics, politics, London: Routledge , 127-167.
36.
O'Neill, P.M.1997: Bringing the qualitative state into economic geography. In Lee, R. and Wills, J. , editors, Geographies of economies, London: Arnold , 290-301.
37.
Panitch, L.1996: Rethinking the role of the state. In Mittelman, J.H. , editor, Globalization: critical reflections, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers , 83-113.
38.
Peck, J.2001: Neoliberalizing states: thin policies/hard outcomes . Progress in Human Geography25, 445-455 .
39.
Peck, J.2002: Political economics of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare . Economic Geography78, 331-360 .
40.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.2002: Neoliberalizing space . Antipode34, 380-404 .
41.
Roberts, S. , Secor, A. and Sparke, M.2003: Neoliberal geopolitics . Antipode35, 886-897 .
42.
Sassen, S.1999: Embedding the global in the national: implications for the role of the state. In Smith, D.A. , Solinger, D.J. and Topik, S.C. , editors, States and sovereignty in the global economy, London: Routledge , 158-171.
43.
Sassen, S.2003: Globalization or denationalization ? Review of International Political Economy10, 1-22 .
44.
Sheppard, E.2002: The spaces and times of globalization: place, scale, networks, and positionality . Economic Geography78, 307-330 .
45.
Smith, D.A. , Solinger, D.J. and Topik, S.C. , editors 1999: States and sovereignty in the global economy. London: Routledge .
46.
Smith, N.1993: Homeless/global: scaling places. In Bird, J. , Curtis, B. , Putnam, T. , Robertson, G. and Tickner, L. , editors, Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change, London: Routledge , 87-119.
47.
Swank, D.2002: Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
48.
Swyngedouw, E.1997a: Excluding the other: the production of scale and scaled politics. In Lee, R. and Wills, J. , editors, Geographies of economies, London: Arnold , 167-176.
49.
Swyngedouw, E.1997b: Neither global nor local: `glocalization' and the politics of scale. In Cox, K.R. , editor, Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local, New York: Guilford Press , 137-166.
50.
Taylor, P.J.1994: The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system . Progress in Human Geography18, 151-162 .
51.
Taylor, P.J.1995: Beyond containers: internationality, interstateness, interterritoriality . Progress in Human Geography19, 1-15 .
52.
Taylor, P.J.1996: Embedded statism and the social sciences: opening up to new spaces . Environment and Planning A28, 1917-1928 .
53.
Taylor, P.J.2000: Embedded statism and the social sciences 2: geographies (and metageographies) in globalization . Environment and Planning A32, 1105-1114 .
54.
Vogel, S.K.1996: Freer markets, more rules: regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
55.
Weiss, L.1998: The myth of the powerless state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press .
56.
Weiss, L.1999: Globalization and national governance: antinomy or interdependence ? Review of International Studies25, 59-88 .
57.
Weiss, L.2003a: Introduction: bringing domestic institutions back in. In Weiss, L. , editor, States in the global economy: bringing domestic institutions back in, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1-33.
58.
Weiss, L. , editor 2003b: States in the global economy: bringing domestic institutions back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
