Amin, A., Massey, D. and Thrift, N.2000: Cities for the many not the few. Bristol: The Policy Press.
2.
Beauregard, R.A.1993: Voices of decline: the postwar fate of US cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
Boyle, M. and Rogerson, R.2001: Power, discourse and city trajectories. In Paddison, R., editor, Handbook of urban studies, London: Sage, 402–416.
4.
Bridge, G.1997: Towards a situated universalism: on strategic rationality and ‘local theory’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15, 633–639.
5.
Bridge, G.2004: Everyday rationality and the emancipatory city. In Lees, L., editor, The emancipatory city? Paradoxes and possibilities, London: Sage, in press.
6.
Davoudi, S. and Healy, P.1995: City challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy13, 79–95.
7.
de Certeau, M.1984: The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
Demeritt, D.2003: What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography26, 767–790.
9.
Dowling, R.1996: Symbolic constructions of place in suburban Surrey, British Columbia. The Canadian Geographer40, 75–80.
10.
Eisinger,P.2000: The politics of bread and circuses: building the city for the visitor class. Urban Affairs Review35(3), 316–333.
11.
Fairclough, N.1992: Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
Fairclough, N.1995: Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
13.
Fischer, F. and Forester, J., editors 1993: The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL Press.
14.
Foucault, M.1977: Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
15.
Foucault, M.1980: Truth and power. In Gordon, C., editor, Michel Foucault, power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, Brighton: Harvester, 109–133.
16.
Goffman, E.1959: The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hajer, M.A.1995: The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Hastings, A.1998: Connecting linguistic structures and social practices: a discursive approach to social policy analysis. Journal of Social Policy27, 191–211.
23.
Hoggart, K., Lees, L. and Davies, A.2002: Researching human geography. London: Arnold.
24.
Imrie, R. and Raco, M., editors 2003: Urban renaissance? New Labour, community and urban policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
25.
Lees, L.2002: Rematerializing geography: the ‘new’ urban geography. Progress in Human Geography26, 101–112.
26.
Lees, L.2003a: The ambivalence of diversity and the politics of urban renaissance: the case of youth in downtown Portland, Maine, USA. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27(3), 613–634.
27.
Lees, L.2003b: Visions of ‘Urban Renaissance’: the Urban Task Force Report and the Urban White Paper. In Imrie, R. and Raco, M., editors, Urban renaissance? New Labour, community and urban policy, Bristol: Policy Press, 61–82.
28.
Lees, L.2003c: Urban geography: ‘new’ urban geography and the ethnographic void. Progress in Human Geography27, 107–113.
29.
Lees, L. and Demeritt, D.1998: Envisioning ‘the livable city’: the interplay of ‘Sin City’ and ‘Sim City’ in Vancouver's planning discourse. Urban Geography19(4), 332–359.
30.
Ley, D.1995: Between Europe and Asia: the case of the missing sequoias. Ecumene2, 185–210.
31.
McCann, E.2004: ‘Best places’: inter-urban competition, quality of life, and popular media discourses. Urban Studies, in press.
32.
Mele, C.2000: The materiality of urban discourse. Urban Affairs Review35, 628–648.
33.
Merrifield, A.1995: Situated knowledge through exploration: reflections on Bunge's geographical expeditions. Antipode27, 49–70.
34.
Merrifield, A. and Swyngedouw, E., editors 1996: The urbanization of injustice. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
35.
Mitchell, K.1996: Visions of Vancouver: ideology, democracy, and the future of urban development. Urban Geography17, 478–501.
36.
Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G.1997: Inner-city policy in Britain: why will it not go away?Urban Affairs Review32, 378–402.
37.
Newman, I.1996: Discourse and the public sector. Local Government Policy Making23, 52–59.
Slater, T.2002: Looking at the ‘North American City’ through the lens of gentrification discourse. Urban Geography23(2), 131–153.
42.
Stenson, K. and Watt, P.1999: Governmentality and ‘the death of the social’?: a discourse analysis of local government texts in south-east England. Urban Studies36, 189–201.
43.
Tonkiss, F.1998: Analysing discourse. In Seale, C., editor, Researching society and culture, London: Sage, 245–260.
44.
Urban Studies1999: Special issue on ‘Dis-course and Urban Change’. Urban Studies36, 1–213.
45.
van Dijk, T.A.1997: The study of discourse. In van Dijk, T.A., editor, Discourse as structure and process, London: Sage, 3–17.
46.
Wilson, D.1996: Metaphors, growth coalition discourses, and black poverty neighborhoods in a US city. Antipode28, 72–96.
47.
Zukin, S., Baskerville, R., Greenberg, M., Guthreau, C., Halley, J., Halling, M., Lawler, K., Nerio, R., Stack, R., Vitale, A. and Wissinger, B.1998: From Coney Island to Las Vegas in the urban imaginary: discursive practices of growth and decline. Urban Affairs Review33(5), 627–654.