This paper argues that an important obstacle to the continued development of critical human geography are ‘islands of practice’, through which scholars become embedded in a research and writing tradition that limits their intellectual and political horizons. I use a recent nondebate in Progress in Human Geography between Sallie Marston and Neil Brenner as an illustration of how islands of practice can stifle intellectual exchange. The paper suggests that the best way to dissolve the islands is a methodological program to create a more synthetic approach that consciously integrates multiple aspects of the critical project.
Agnew, J.1997: The dramaturgy of horizons: geographical scale in the ‘reconstruction of Italy’ by the new Italian political parties, 1992–95. Political Geography16, 99–121.
2.
Amin, A.2002: Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning A34, 385–400.
3.
Blomley, N.and Pratt, G.2001: Canada and the political geographies of rights. Canadian Geographer45, 151–166.
4.
Brenner, N.2001: The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography25, 591–614.
5.
Brenner, N.2002: Decoding the newest ‘metropolitan regionalism’ in the USA: a critical overview. Cities19, 3–21.
6.
Brodkin, K.2000: Global capitalism: what's race got to do with it?American Ethnologist27, 237–257.
7.
Burroughs, R., Schwartz, T.and Hendricks-Lee, M.2000: Communities of practice and discourse communities: negotiating boundaries in NBPTS certification. Teachers College Record102, 344–374.
8.
Castells, M.1977: The urban question: a Marxist approach. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9.
Castells, M.1983: The city and the grassroots. London: Edward Arnold.
10.
Edward Arnold. Cutting, J.2000: Analysing the language of discourse communities. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences.
11.
Delaney, D.and Leitner, H.1997: The political construction of scale. Political Geography16, 93–97.
12.
Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton, S.and Woods, M.2001: Partnerships, power, and scale in rural governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19, 289–310.
13.
England, K.2000: ‘It's really hitting home’; the home as a site for long-term health care. WE International48–49, 25–26.
14.
Forman, E.2000: Knowledge building in discourse communities. Human Development43, 364–368.
15.
Gibson-Graham, J.K.1996: The end of capitalism (as we knew it). Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Gilbert, M.2001: From the ‘walk for adequate welfare’ to the ‘march for our lives’: welfare rights organizing in the 1960s and 1990s. Urban Geography22, 440–456.
17.
Goodwin, M. and Painter, J.1996: Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS21, 635–648.
18.
Hanson, S.and Pratt, G.1995: Gender, work, and space. New York: Routledge.
19.
Harvey, D.1989: The urban experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Herod, A.1997: Labor's spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US east coast longshore industry, 1953–89. Political Geography16, 145–169.
21.
Holloway, S.and Valentine, G.2001: Children at home in the wired world: reshaping and rethinking home in urban geography. Urban Geography22, 562–584.
22.
Howitt, R.1998: Scale as relation: musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area30, 49–58.
23.
Jessop, B.1998: The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal155, 29–45.
24.
Jonas, A.1994: The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12, 257–264.
25.
Katz, C.and Monk, J.,editors 1993: Full circles: geographies of women over the life course. New York: Routledge.
26.
Lauria, M., editor 1997: Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy. London: Sage.
27.
MacLeod, G.1999: Entrepreneurial spaces, hegemony, and state strategy: the political shaping of privatism in lowland Scotland. Environment and Planning A31, 345–375.
28.
MacLeod, G.and Goodwin, M.1999: Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography23, 503–527.
29.
Marston, S.A.2000: The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography24, 219–242.
30.
Marston, S.A.2002: A long way from home: domesticating the social construction of scale. In McMaster, R. and Sheppard, E., editors, Scale and geographic inquiry: nature, society and methodCambridge, MA: Blackwell.
31.
Marston, S.A.and Smith, N.2001: States, scales and households: limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography25, 615–620.
32.
Oberhauser, A.1995: Towards a gendered regional geography: women and work in rural Appalachia. Growth and Change26, 217–245.
33.
Oberhauser, A.1997: The home as ‘field’: households and homework in rural Appalachia. In Jones, J., Nast, H. and Roberts, S., editors, Thresholds in feminist geography, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 165–182.
34.
Peck, J.and Tickell, A.1994: Searching for a new institutional fix: the after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder. In Amin, A., editor, Post Fordism: a reader, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 280–315.
35.
Purcell, M.1997: Ruling Los Angeles: neighborhood movements, urban regimes, and the production of space in Southern California. Urban Geography18, 684–704.
36.
Purcell, M.2002: The state, regulation, and global restructuring: reasserting the political in political economy. Review of International Political Economy9, 284–318.
37.
Rabrenovic, G.1995: Women and collective action in urban neighborhoods. In Garber, J. and Turner, R., editors, Gender in urban research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 77–98.
38.
Saegert, S.1981: Masculine cities and feminine suburbs: polarized ideas, contradictory realities. In Stimpson, C., Dixler, E., Nelson, M. and Yatrakis, K., editors, Women and the American city, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 93–108.
39.
Smith, N.1990: Uneven development: nature, capital, and the production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
Smith, N.1992: Contours of a spatialized politics: homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text33, 55–81.
41.
Smith, N.1996: The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. New York: Routledge.
42.
Soja, E.1996: Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
43.
Stone, C.1989: Regime politics: governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
44.
Swyngedouw, E.1992: The Mammon quest. ‘Glocalization,’ interspatial competition and the monetary order: the construction of new spatial scales. In Dunford, M. and Kafkalas, G., editors, Cities and regions in the new Europe: the global-local interplay and spatial development strategies, London: Belhaven.
45.
Swyngedouw, E.1997a: Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In Cox, K., editor, Spaces of globalization, New York: Guilford Press, 137–166.
46.
Swyngedouw, E.1997b: Power, nature, and the city: the conquest of water and the political ecology or urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990. Environment and Planning A29, 311–322.
47.
Swyngedouw, E.1999: Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers89, 443–465.
48.
Swyngedouw, E.2000: Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18, 63–76.
49.
Valocchi, S.1999: The class-inflected nature of gay identity. Social Problems46, 207–227.
50.
Whatmore, S.and Thorne, L.1997: Networks: alternative geographies of food. In Goodman, M. and Watts, M., editors, Globalising food: agrarian questions and global restructuring, New York: Routledge, 287–304.
51.
Williams, R.1999: Environmental injustice in America and its politics of scale. Political Geography18, 49–73.
52.
Wright, M.1998: ‘Maquiladora mestizas’ and a feminist border politics: revisiting Anzaldua. Hypatia13, 114–132.
