Since 1980 the dominance of elected municipal government in Britain has given way to a broader local governance. While the precise configuration of this change has been debated in detail, approaches to the processes of restructuring and the operation and relative efficacy of new arrangements remain empirically limited and theoretically underdeveloped. We explore the usefulness of a range of contemporary theoretical accounts including regulationist approaches in responding to these lacunae. In developing our analysis we argue first that explaining the restructuring of local governance requires (amongst a range of developments) further theoretical and empirical work on local business interest representation; and, secondly, that attempts to move beyond partial evaluations of the new local governance must be predicated upon appropriate and rigorous theoretical foundations.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N.1995: Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy in Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A., editors, Managing cities: the new urban context, Chichester: Wiley, 91–108.
2.
Audit Commission1988: The competitive council. London: HMSO.
3.
Bennett, R.J.1998Business associations and their potential to contribute to economic development: reexploring an interface between the state and market. Environment and Planning A30, 1367–1387.
4.
Bennett, R.J. and Krebs, G.1991: Local economic development: public–private partnership initiatives in Britain and Germany. London: Belhaven.
5.
Bennett, R.J., Wicks, P. and McCoshan, A.1994: Local empowerment and business services. London: UCL Press.
6.
Dabinett, G. and Ramsden, P.1993: An urban policy for people: lessons from Sheffield. In Imrie, R. and Thomas, H., editors, British urban policy and the urban development corporations, London: Paul Chapman, 123–135.
7.
Davoudi, S.1995: Dilemmas of urban governance. In Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A., editors, Managing cities: the new urban context, Chichester: Wiley, 225–230.
8.
Davoudi, S. and Healey, P.1995: City Challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy13, 79–95.
9.
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions1998: Modernising local government: local democracy and community leadership. London: DETR.
10.
Duncan, S.1989: What is locality? In Peet, R. and Thrift, N., editors, New models in geography. London: Unwin Hyman, 221–252.
11.
Eisenschitz, A. and Gough, J.1998: Theorizing the state in local economic governance. Regional Studies32, 759–768.
12.
Elkin, S.1987: City and regime in the American republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Goodwin, M. and Painter, J.1997: Concrete research, urban regimes and regulation theory. In Lauria, M., editor, Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy, London: Sage, 13–29.
14.
Harding, A.1991: The rise of urban growth coalitions, UK style?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy9, 295–317.
15.
Harvey, D.1989: From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler71B, 3–17.
16.
Hastings, A. and McArthur, A.1995: A comparative assessment of government approaches to partnership with the local community. In Hambleton, R. and Thomas, H., editors, Urban policy evaluation, London: Paul Chapman, 175–193.
17.
Hay, C.1995: Re-stating the problem of regulation and re-regulating the local state. Economy and Society24, 3387–407.
Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A., editors, 1995: Managing cities: the new urban context. Chichester: Wiley.
20.
Imrie, R. and Raco, M.1999: How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers24, 45–63.
21.
Imrie, R. and Thomas, H.1995: Changes in local governance and their implication for urban policy evaluation. In Hambleton, R. and Thomas, H., editors, Urban policy evaluation, London: Paul Chapman, 123–138.
22.
Jenkins, R.1992: Pierre Bourdieu. London: Sage.
23.
Jenson, J.1989: Paradigms and political discourse: legislation in France and the United States before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science22, 235–258.
24.
Jenson, J.1990: Representations in crisis: the roots of Canada's permeable Fordism. Canadian Journal of Political Science23, 653–683.
25.
Jenson, J.1993: Naming nations: making nationalist claims in Canadian public discourse. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology30, 337–358.
26.
Jessop, B.1990: Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society19, 153–216.
27.
Jessop, B.1997: A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes. In Lauria, M., editor, Reconstructing urban regime theory, London: Sage, 51–73.
28.
Jessop, B., Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1999: Retooling the machine: economic crisis, state restructuring and urban politics. In Jonas, A. and Wilson, D., editors, The urban growth machine, New York: SUNY Press, 141–159.
29.
Johnston, R. and Pattie, C.1996: Local government in governance: the 1994–95 restructuring of local government in England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20, 671–696.
30.
Jones, M.1997: Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. Environment and Planning A29, 831–864.
31.
Jones, M.1998: Restructuring the local state: economic governance or social regulation?Political Geography17, 959–988.
32.
Jones, M.1999: New institutional spaces. London: Jessica Kingsley.
33.
Leach, S., Stewart, J. and Walsh, K.1994: The changing organisation and management of local government. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
34.
Lewis, N. and Wiles, P.1984: The post-corporatist state. Journal of Law and Society11, 65–90.
35.
Lovering, J.1995: Creating discourses rather than jobs: the crisis in the cities and the transition fantasies of intellectuals and policy makers. In Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A., editors, Managing cities: the new urban context, Chichester: Wiley, 109–126.
36.
Lowndes, V., Skelcher, C., Nanton, P. and McCabe, A.1997: Networks, partnership and urban regeneration. Local Economy11, 333–342.
37.
MacLeod, G.1997: Globalizing Parisian thought-waves: recent advances in the study of social regulation, politics, discourse and space. Progress in Human Geography21, 530–553.
38.
Mayer, M.1992: The shifting local political system in European cities. In Dunford, M. and Kafkalas, G., editors, Cities and regions in the new Europe, London: Belhaven, 255–274.
39.
Mayer, M.1995Urban governance in the post-Fordist city. In Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A., editors, Managing cities: the new urban context, Chichester: Wiley, 231–249.
40.
Moore, C. and Pierre, J.1988: Partnership or privatisation? The political economy of local economic restructuring. Policy and Politics16, 169–178.
41.
North, P., Valler, D.and Wood, A.1999: Towards a constructivist analysis of business agendas for local economic development. Unpublished manuscript. Copy available from P. North, School for Urban Development and Policy, South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK.
42.
Oatley, N.1998a: Transitions in urban policy: explaining the emergence of the ‘challenge fund’ model. In Oatley, N., editor, Cities, economic competition and urban policy. London: Paul Chapman, 21–38.
43.
Oatley, N.1998b: Cities, economic competition and urban policy. In Oatley, N., editor, Cities, economic competition and urban policy. London: Paul Chapman, 3–20.
44.
Oatley, N. and Lambert, C.1998: Catalyst for change: the City Challenge initiative. In Oatley, N., editor Cities, economic competition and urban policy, London: Paul Chapman, 109–126.
45.
Offe, C.1985: The attribution of public status to interest groups. In Offe, C., editor, Disorganized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 221–258.
46.
Offe, C. and Wiesenthal, H.1985: Two logics of collective action. In Offe, C., editor, Disorganized capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, 170–220.
47.
Painter, J.1997: Regulation, regime, and practice in urban politics. In Lauria, M., editor, Reconstructing urban regime theory, London: Sage, 122–143.
48.
Painter, J. and Goodwin, M.1995: Local governance and concrete research: investigating the uneven development of regulation. Economy and Society24, 334–356.
49.
Peck, J.1992: TECs and the local politics of training. Political Geography11, 335–354.
50.
Peck, J.1995: Moving and shaking: business elites, state localism and urban privatism. Progress in Human Geography19, 16–46.
51.
Peck, J.1998: Geographies of governance: TECs and the neo-liberalisation of ‘local interests’. Space and Polity2, 5–31.
52.
Peck, J. and Jones, M.1995: Training and enterprise councils: Schumpeterian workfare state, or what?Environment and Planning A27, 1361–1396.
53.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1995: Business goes local: dissecting the ‘business agenda’ in Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research19, 56–78.
54.
Raco, M.1998: Assessing institutional thickness in the local context: studies of Cardiff and Sheffield. Environment and Planning A30, 975–996.
55.
Rhodes, R.A.W.1988: Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: the sub-central governments of Britain. London: Unwin Hyman.
56.
Roberts, P. and Whitney, D.1993: The new partnership: inter-agency cooperation and urban policy in Leeds. In Imrie, R. and Thomas, H., editors, British urban policy and the urban development corporations, London: Paul Chapman, 154–172.
57.
Robinson, F. and Shaw, K.1991: Urban regeneration and community involvement. Local Economy6, 61–72.
58.
Sayer, A.1992: Method in social science. London: Hutchinson.
59.
Schmitter, P.1985: Neo-corporatism and the state. In Grant, W., editor, The political economy of corporatism, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 32–62.
60.
Stewart, J. and Stoker, G., editors, 1995: Local government in the 1990s. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
61.
Stewart, M.1998: Partnership, leadership and competition in urban policy. In Oatley, N., editor, Cities, economic competition and urban policy, London: Paul Chapman, 77–90.
62.
Stoker, G.1995: Regime theory and urban politics. In Judge, D., Stoker, G. and Wolman, H., editors, Theories of urban politics, London: Sage, 54–71.
63.
Stone, C.1989: Regime politics: governing Atlanta 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
64.
Stone, C.1993Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs15, 1–28.
65.
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P., editors, 1985: Private interest government: beyond market and state. London: Sage.
66.
Thomas, H. and Imrie, R.1997: Urban development corporations and local governance in the UK. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie88, 53–64.
67.
Turok, I.1989: Evaluation and understanding in local economic policy. Urban Studies26, 587–606.
68.
Valler, D.1996: Locality, local economic strategy and private sector involvement. Political Geography15, 383–403.
Ward, K.1997: Coalitions in urban regeneration: a regime approach. Environment and Planning A29, 1493–1506.
71.
Wolch, J.1989: The shadow state: transformations in the voluntary sector. In Wolch, J. and Dear, M., editors, The power of geography, Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, 197–221.
72.
Wood, A.1998: Questions of scale in the entrepreneurial city. In Hall, T. and Hubbard, P., editors, The entrepreneurial city: geographies of politics, regime and representation, Chichester: Wiley, 275–284.
73.
Wood, A., Valler, D. and North, P.1998: Local business representation and the private sector role in local economic policy in Britain. Local Economy13, 10–27.
