Ethnography is an underused methodology in geography. This neglect is especially injurious to the discipline because ethnography provides unreplicable insight into the processes and meanings that sustain and motivate social groups. These processes and meanings vary across space, and are central to the construction and transformation of landscapes; they are both place-bound and place-making. Ethnography's potential contribution to geography is thus profound. The aversion to ethnography may derive from three major criticisms frequently directed toward it: that it is unscientific; that it is too limited to enable generalization; and that it fails to consider its inherent representational practices. Considered responses to these critiques, however, restore ethnography's significance for geographic study.
Abbott, A.1997: Of time and space: the contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Social Forces75, 1149–1182.
2.
Adler, P. and Adler, P.1994: Observational techniques. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 377–392.
3.
Anderson, E.1999: Code of the street: decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.
4.
Atkinson, P.1990: The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. London and New York: Routledge.
5.
Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M.1994: Ethnography and participant observation. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 248–261.
6.
Basso, K.1984: Stalking with stories: names, places and moral narratives among the western Apache. In Platter, S., editor, Text, play and story: the construction and reconstruction of self and society, Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society, 19–55.
7.
Bourdieu, P.1984: Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Brown, M.1997: RePlacing citizenship. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
Bulmer, M.1979: Concepts in the analysis of qualitative data. Sociological Review27, 651–677.
10.
Buroway, M.1979: Manufacturing consent: changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Buroway, M.1991: Ethnography unbound: power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
12.
Calavita, K.1992: Inside the state: the Bracero Program, immigration and the INS. New York and London: Routledge.
13.
Carney, J. and Watts, M.1991: Disciplining women: rice, mechanization, and the evolution of Mandinka gender relations in Senegambia. Signs16, 651–681.
14.
Cicourel, A.1964: Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press.
15.
Clark, G.L.1998: Stylized facts and close dialogue: methodology in economic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers88, 73–87.
16.
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.1986: Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
17.
Cooper, B.1997: Gender, movement and history: social and spatial transformation in 20th century Mardi, Niger. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15, 195–227.
18.
Demeritt, D.1996: Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers21, 484–503.
19.
Denzin, N.1997: Interpretive ethnography: ethno-graphic practice for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Douglas, J.1976: Investigative social research: individual and team field research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Eliasoph, N.1996: Making a fragile public: a talk-centered study of citizenship and power. Theoretical Sociology14, 262–289.
22.
Emerson, R., Fretz, R. and Shaw, L.1995: Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Eyles, J.1988: Interpreting the geographical world: qualitative approaches in geographical research. In Eyles, J. and Smith, D., editors, Qualitative methods in human geography, Totawa, NJ: Barnes & Noble, 1–16.
24.
Fetterman, D.1998: Ethnography step by step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Gagne, P. and Tewksbury, R.1998: Conformity pressures and gender resistance among transgendered individuals. Social Problems45, 81–101.
26.
Gans, H.1967: The Levittowners: ways of life and politics in a new suburban community. New York: Pantheon.
27.
Gardner, C.1995: Passing by: gender and public harassment. Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
28.
Garfinkel, H.1967: Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
Giddens, A.1984: The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
30.
Gieryn, T.1999: Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Glaser, B. and Straus, A.1967: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
32.
Goffman, E.1961: Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
33.
Gregory, D.1989: The crisis of modernity? Human geography and critical social theory. In Peet, R. and Thrift, N., editors, New models in geography: the political economy perspective, London: Unwin Hyman, 348–385.
34.
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P.1983: Ethnography: principles in practice. London and New York: Tavistock.
35.
Harraway, D.1988: Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14, 575–599.
36.
Herbert, S.1997. Policing space: territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
Holstein, J. and Gubrium, J.1994: Phenomenology, ethnomethodology and interpretive practice. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 262–272.
38.
Hunt, J.1984: The development of rapport through the negotiation of gender in field work among police. Human Organization43, 283–296.
39.
Jackson, P.1985: Urban ethnography. Progress in Human Geography9, 157–176.
40.
Jackson, P.1991: The crisis of representation and the politics of position. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9, 131–134.
41.
Katz, C.1991: Sow what you know: the struggle for social reproduction in rural Sudan. Annals of the Association of American Geographers81, 488–514.
42.
Katz, C.1994: All the world is staged: intellectuals and the projects of ethnography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10, 495–510.
43.
Keith, M.1994: Angry writing: (re)presenting the unethical world of the ethnographer. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10, 551–568.
44.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1981: The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
45.
Latour, B.1987: Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Law, J. and Williams, R.1982: Putting the facts together: a study of scientific persuasion. Social Studies of Science12, 535–558.
47.
Leo, R.1995: Trial and tribulations: courts, ethnography, and the need for an evidentiary privilege for academic researchers. The American Sociologist26, 113–134.
48.
Ley, D.1974: The black inner city as frontier outpost. Washington, DC: The Association of American Geographers.
49.
Ley, D.1981: Behavioral geography and philosophies of meaning. In Cox, K. and Colledge, R, editors, Behavioral problems in geography revisited, New York and London: Methuen, 209–230.
50.
Ley, D.1988: Interpretive social research in the inner city. In Eyles, J., editor, Research in human geography, Oxford: Blackwell, 121–138.
51.
Liebow, E.1967: Tally's Corner: a study of Negro streetcorner men. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
52.
Lofland, J.1976: Doing social life: the qualitative study of human interaction in natural settings. New York: Wiley.
53.
Lofland, J.1995: Analytic ethnography: features, failings and futures. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography24, 30–67.
54.
Lynch, M.985: Art and artifact in laboratory science: a study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
55.
Marcus, G.1994: What comes (just) after ‘post’? The case of ethnography. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 563–574.
56.
Marcus, G.1999: Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Marcus, G. and Fisher, M.1986: Anthropology as cultural critique. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Merry, S.1981: Urban danger: life in a neighborhood of strangers. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
59.
Miller, R.1983: The Hoover in the garden: middle-class women and suburbanization, 1850–1920. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1, 73–87.
60.
Mitchell, C.1983: Case and situation analysis. Sociological Review31, 187–211.
61.
Myers, F.1988: Locating ethnographic practice: romance, reality, and politics in the Outback. American Ethnologist15, 609–624.
62.
Myers, G.1996: Naming and placing the other: power and the urban landscape in Zanzibar. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie87, 237–246.
63.
Nash, D. and Wintrob, R.1972: The emergence of self-consciousness in ethnography. Current Anthropology13, 527–542.
64.
Nigar, R.1997: The making of Hindu communal organizations, places and identities in postcolonial Dar Es Salaam. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15, 707–730.
65.
Oliver, W.1994: The violent social world of black men. New York: Lexington Books.
66.
Painter, K.1992: Different worlds: the spatial, temporal and social dimensions of female victimization. In Evans, D., Fyfe, N. and Herbert, D., editors, Crime, policing and place, London and New York: Routledge, 164–195.
67.
Pile, S.1991: Practising interpretative geography. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers16, 458–469.
68.
Pratt, M.L.1992: Imperial eyes: travel writing and transculturation. London and New York: Routledge.
69.
Pred, A.1986: Place, practice and structure: social and spatial transformation in southern Sweden, 1750-1850. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble.
Rubinstein, J.1973: City police. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
72.
Runstrom, R. and Kenzer, M.1989: The decline of fieldwork in human geography. The Professional Geographer41, 294–303.
73.
Sangren, P.S.1988: Rhetoric and the authority of ethnography. Current Anthropology29, 405–424.
74.
Sayer, A.1991: Behind the locality debate: deconstructing geography's dualisms. Environment and Planning A23, 283–308.
75.
Schoenberger, E.1991: The corporate interview as a research method in economic geography. The Professional Geographer43, 180–189.
76.
Schroeder, R.1997: ‘Re-claiming’ land in The Gambia: gendered property rights and environmental intervention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87, 487–508.
77.
Scott, J.1985: Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
78.
Sewell, W.1992: A theory of structure: duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology98, 1–29.
79.
Short, J.1998: The level of explanation problem revisited. Criminology36, 3–36.
80.
Silverman, D.1985: Qualitative methods and sociology. Aldershot: Gower.
81.
Smith, D.1987: Everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
82.
Smith, D.1989: Women's work as mothers: a new look at the relation of class, family and school achievement. Perspectives on Social Problems1, 109–125.
83.
Smith, S.1984: Practising humanistic geography. Annals of the Association of the American Geographers74, 353–374.
84.
Smith, S.1988: Constructing local knowledge: the analysis of self in everyday life. In Eyles, J. and Smith, D., editors, Qualitative methods in human geography, Totawa, NJ: Barnes & Noble, 17–38.
85.
Stacey, J.1988: Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women's Studies International Forum11, 21–27.
86.
Staeheli, L. and Lawson, V.1994: A discussion of women in the field: the politics of feminist fieldwork. The Professional Geographer46, 96–102.
87.
Stanley, L. and Wise, S.1990: Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research. In Stanley, L., editor, Feminist praxis, London and New York: Routledge, 20–60.
Thomas, J.1993: Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
90.
Thrift, N.1983: On the determination of social action in space and time. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1, 23–57.
91.
Van Maanen, J.1988: Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
92.
Walton, J.1992: Making the theoretical case. In Ragin, C. and Becker, H., editors, What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121–137.
93.
Wax, M.1980: Paradoxes of ‘consent’ to the practice of fieldwork. Social Problems27, 272–283.
94.
Weider, D.1974: Language and social reality: the case of telling the convict code. The Hague: Mouton.
95.
West, C. and Zimmerman, D.1987: Doing gender. Gender and Society1, 125–151.
96.
Western, J.1992: A passage to England: Barbadian Londoners speak of home. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
97.
Willis, P.1977: Learning to labor: how working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
98.
Winchester, H. and Costello, L.1995: Living in the street: social organization and gender relations of Australian street kids. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13, 329–348.
99.
Wright, M.1997: Crossing the factory frontier: gender, place and power in the Mexican maquiladora. Antipode29, 278–302.
