‘Someone to talk to’ and ‘pain control’: what people expect from a specialist palliative care team

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative analysis of a subsample of data from a larger investigation into general practitioner referrals to specialist palliative care services (SPCS). The aim was to identify the expectations and perceptions of patients with advanced cancer and their relatives. Twenty-nine individuals were interviewed (18 patients, 11 relatives). Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts was undertaken using an approach based on interpretative phenomenological analysis. The results indicated that SPCS were perceived as providing psychosocial services, characterized as ‘support’ and ‘someone to talk to’. SPCS were expected to have ‘expertise in symptom control’, particularly in relation to pain management. The study demonstrated that patients' and relatives' expectations of a referral to SPCS were of psychosocial support and symptom control. It is argued that the implications of this restricted view of SPCS may mean that other salient concerns are not raised by patients and relatives.

Keywords

palliative care terminal care patient care caregivers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Department of Health Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales . A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. Calman-Hine report. London: Department of Health, 1995.

Ream E , Richardson A . Fatigue – a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 1996; 33: 519–529.

Neale B . Informal care and community care. In: Clark D ed. The future of palliative care: issues of policy and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1993: 52–67.

Grande GE , Todd CJ , Barclay SIG . Support needs in the last year of life: patient and carer dilemmas. Palliat Med 1997; 11: 202–208.

de Raeve L . Ethical issues in palliative care research. Palliat Med 1994; 8: 298–305.

Addington-Hall J , McCarthy M . Dying from cancer: results of a national population-based investigation. Palliat Med 1995; 9: 295–305.

Seale C , Cartwright A . The year before death. Aldershot: Avebury, 1991.

Higginson IJ , Priest P , McCarthy M . Are bereaved family members a valid proxy for a patient's assessment of dying? Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 553–557.

Hinton J . How reliable are relatives' retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients' and relatives' accounts compared. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1229–1236.

10.

Jarrett NJ , Payne SA , Wiles R . Terminally ill patients' and lay carers' perceptions and experiences of community-based services. J Adv Nurs 1998 (in press).

11.

Payne S . Lay representations of breast cancer. Psychol Health 1990; 5: 1–11.

12.

Sensky J . Eliciting lay beliefs across cultures: principles and methodology. Br J Cancer 1996; 74: S63–S65.

13.

Payne S , Turner P , Hillier R , Jarrett N . Care of the dying at home: access to multidisciplinary specialist palliative care. Final Report to NHS Executive South and West. Southampton: Health Research Unit, University of Southampton, 1997.

14.

Smith JA . Semistructured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In: Smith JA , Harre R , van Langenhove L eds. Rethinking methods in psychology. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995: 9–26.

15.

Doyle D . Specialist palliative care services defined. In: Needs assessment for hospice and specialist palliative care services: from philosophy to contracts. National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services. Occasional Paper 4. December 1993: 11–15.

16.

James N , Field D . The routinization of hospice: charisma and bureaucratization. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 1363–1375.

17.

Hunt M . Scripts for dying at home – displayed in nurses', patients' and relatives' talk. J Adv Nurs 1992; 17: 1297–1302.

18.

Yardley L . Introducing material-discursive approaches to health and illness. In: Yardley L ed. Material discourses of health and illness. London: Routledge, 1997: 1–24.