Fitzpatrick R, Boulton M. Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Quality Health Care1994; 3: 107–113.
2.
Clark D. What is qualitative research and what can it contribute to palliative care?Palliat Med1997; 11: 159–166.
3.
Ingleton C, Field D, Clark D, Carradice M, Crowther A. King's Mill Hospice: three years on (1991–94). Occasional paper 16. Sheffield: Trent Palliative Care Centre, 1995.
4.
Ingleton C, White F, Clark D. What did we do without it: an evaluation of the services provided by Newark and District hospice aid (Beaumond House). Occasional paper 18. Sheffield: Trent Palliative Care Centre, 1996.
5.
Ingleton C, Field D, Clark D. Multi-disciplinary case study as an approach to the evaluation of palliative care services: two examples. Int J Pall Nursing1997; 3: 335–339.
6.
Field D, Ingleton C, Clark D. The cost of unpaid labour: the use of voluntary staff in the King's Mill Hospice. Health Soc Care Comm1997; 5: 198–208.
7.
Keen J, Packwood T. Case study evaluation. Br Med J1995; 311: 444–446.
8.
Smith G, Cantley C. Pluralistic evaluation. Evaluation: research highlights in social work 8, 2nd edition. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1991.
9.
Denzin NK. The research art in sociology: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. London: Sage,1970.
10.
Guba EG, Lincoln YG. Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1989.
11.
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edition. Applied social research methods series, vol 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
14.
Yin RK. Application of case study research. Applied social research methods series, vol 34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994.
15.
Janesick VJ. The dance of qualitative research design: metaphor, methodolatory and meaning. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS eds. A handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1994.
16.
Nolan M, Behi R. Triangulation: the best of both worlds?Br J Nursing1995; 4: 829–832.
17.
Jick T. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Admin Sci Quart1979; 24: 602–611.
18.
Corner J. In search of more complete answers to research questions: qualitative versus quantitative research methods. J Adv Nursing1991; 16: 718–727.
19.
Campell D, Fiske D. Convergent and discriminant validation by multi-trait multi-dimensional matrix. Psych Bull1959; 56: 81–105.
20.
Ovretveit J. Co-ordinating community care: multi-disciplinary teams and care management. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1993.
21.
Hunter S, Brace C, Buckley G. The inter-disciplinary assessment of older people at entry into long term institutional care: lessons from the new community care arrangements. Res Policy Plan1993; 11(1/2): 2–9.
22.
Grayden JE, West P, Galloway S et al. Bridging the gap between research and clinical practice: a collaborative approach. Oncology Nursing Forum1993; 20: 953–954.
23.
Wiggington MA, Miracle VA, Sims J, Mitchell K. Partners in nursing education collaborate on continuing education projects 1994. J Nursing Staff Develop10: 245–247.
24.
Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ. Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1947.
25.
James N. A postscript to nursing. In: Abbott P, Sapsford R eds. Research into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1992: 20–28.
26.
Powers B. Taking sides: a response to Goodwin and Goodwin. Nursing Res1987; 36: 122–126.
27.
Goodwin L, Goodwin W. Qualitative versus quantitative research or qualitative and quantitative research?Nursing Res1984; 33: 378–380.
28.
Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. Br Med J1995; 311: 42–45.