In this case study we describe a dual approach to the palliation of difficult muscle spasms using intrathecal baclofen via a fully implanted system, together with the homeopathic approach to symptom control. The homeopathy is seen to complement rather than to replace conventional prescribing and using both approaches together appears to have avoided the necessity for increasing drug doses and to have minimized side-effects. As well as encouraging us to take on experience from other disciplines, this case study also suggests that palliative care could be a forum for evaluating the effectiveness of the homeopathic approach in symptom control in carefully designed studies.
Coffey JR, Cahill D, Steers W et al. Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spasticity of spinal origin: results of a long term multicentre study. J Neurosurgery1993; 78: 226–232.
2.
Downer SM, Cody MM, McCluskey P et al. Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment. Br Med J1994; 309: 86–89.
3.
Clover A, Last P, Fisher P, Wright S, Boyle H. Complementary therapy: a pilot study of patients, therapies and quality of life. Complement Therap Med1995; 3: 129–133.
4.
Reilly D, Taylor MA, Beattie N et al. Is homeopathy a placebo response? Controlled trials of homeopathic potency with pollen in hayfever as a model. Lancet1986; ii: 881–886.
5.
Kleijnen J, Knipscild P, ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homeopathy. Br Med J1991; 302: 316–323.
6.
Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet1997; 350: 834–843.
