Williams G. Euthanasia legislation: a rejoinder to the non-religious objections. Reprinted in Downing AB ed. Euthanasia and the right to death: the case for voluntary euthanasia. London: Peter Owen, 1969: 134–147.
2.
Board for Social Responsibility of the Church of England. On dying well: an Anglican contribution to the debate on euthanasia. London: Church House Publishing, 2000.
3.
Keown J. Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: an argument against legalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
4.
Watt H. Life and death in healthcare ethics: a short companion. London: Routledge, 2000.
5.
Otlowski MFA. Voluntary euthanasia and the common law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
6.
Doyal L, Doyal L. Why active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should be legalised. BM J2001: 323: 1079–1080.
7.
Beyleveld D, Brownsword R. Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
8.
Biggs H. Euthanasia, death with dignity and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001.
9.
van Zyl L. Death and compassion: a virtue-based approach to euthanasia. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.
10.
House of Lords Select Committee. Report of the Select Committee on M edical Ethics, HL Paper 21. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1994: paragraph 21.
11.
Gillon R. When doctors might kill their patients: foreseeing is not necessarily the same as intending. BM J1999: 318: 1431–1432.
12.
Doyal R. When doctors might kill their patients: the moral character of clinicians or the best interests of patients?BM J1999: 318: 1432–1433.
13.
Battin MP, Rhodes R, Silvers A eds. Physician assisted suicide: expanding the debate. New York: Routledge, 1998.
14.
State of Washington et al. v Glucksberg et al. S Ct 2258 (1997); Vacco et al. v Quill et al. 117 S Ct 2293 (1997).
15.
Chambre des Repreésentants de Belgique. Project de loi relatif à l'euthanasie. Doc 50 1488/001. Brussels: Chambre des Repreésentants de Belgique, 2002.
16.
Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act 2001. Eur J Health Law2001: 8: 183–191.
17.
Moöller M, Huxtable R. Euthanasia in the Netherlands: the case of ‘life fatigue’. New Law J2001: 151: 1600–1601.
18.
Re A (Conjoined Twins: M edical Treatment) [2001] 1 FLR 1.
19.
Re B (Adult: R efusal of M edical Treatment) [2002] 2 All ER 449.
20.
R (on the application of Pretty) v DPP [2002] 1 FLR 268.
21.
Application No 2346/02 Pretty v UK (2002).
22.
General Medical Council. W ithholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatments: good practice in decision-making. London: General Medical Council, 2002.
23.
British Medical Association. W ithholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment: Guidance for decision making, second edition. London: British Medical Association, 2000.
24.
British Medical Association, The Resuscitation Council (UK), The Royal College of Nursing. Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J M ed Ethics2001: 27: 310–316.
25.
Ravenscroft AJ, Bell MDD. ‘End-of-life’ decision making within intensive care-objective, consistent, defensible?J M ed Ethics2000: 26: 435–440.
