Family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care in Japan

Abstract

Whereas satisfaction is one of the most important outcomes in palliative care settings, there have been no systematic studies investigating the effects of family and organizationrelated variables on family satisfaction with care. To clarify factors contributing to family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care services, a cross-sectional mailed survey was performed.

A 60-item questionnaire was mailed to 1026 bereaved subjects who had lost family members at one of 37 palliative care units in Japan to evaluate their sociodemographic characteristics and satisfaction levels with care. An institution survey was performed to collect organization-related variables. Caregiver satisfaction was rated on the Satisfaction scale for Family members receiving Inpatient Palliative Care (Sat-Fam-IPC). A total of 640 responses were analysed (response rate=62%).

The responses to overall satisfaction were ‘satisfied’ in 41% and ‘very satisfied’ in 47%. The mean total score of the Sat-Fam-IPC was 82.4±13.2 on the 0— 100 scale. The mean subscale scores were: 85.8±14.5 (Nursing Care), 81.5±18.4 (Symptom Palliation), 85.0±13.8 (Facility), 83.3±16.6 (Information), 83.1±17.3 (Availability), 78.3±18.9 (Family Care), and 79.8±17.3 (Cost).

Significant determinants of family satisfaction identified were: nursing system, the number of nurses at night and presence of attending medical social workers (Nursing Care), patient age and the number of physicians (Symptom Palliation), floor space per bed (Facility), duration of admission and presence of attending medical social workers (Availability), patient age, family age, gender and occupational status (Family Care), patient age and the extra charge for a private room (Cost).

In conclusion, informal caregivers are generally satisfied with inpatient palliative care services provided by members of the Japanese Association of Hospice and Palliative Care Units. The levels of satisfaction are influenced by various family and organization-related variables.

Keywords

neoplasms palliative care satisfaction terminal care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hall JA , Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30: 811–818.

Lewis JR. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med 1994; 39: 655–670.

Sitzia J , Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1829–1843.

Fakhoury W , McCarthy M , Addington-Hall J. Determinants of informal caregivers' satisfaction with services for dying cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42: 721–731.

Kristjanson LJ. Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 693–701.

Morita T , Chihara S , Kashiwagi T. Satisfaction scale for Family members receiving Inpatient Palliative Care: a validation study. Pouse Met 2002; 16(last issue).

Field D , Dand P , Ahmedzai S , Biswas B. Care and information received by lay carers of terminally ill patients at the Leicestershire Hospice. Palliat Med 1992; 6: 245–267.

Foster LW. Hospice care: art and science evaluating primary caregiver perceptions. Hosp J 1987; 3: 31–45.

Hannnann EL , O'Donnell JF. An evaluation of hospices in the New York State Hospice Demonstration Program. Inquiry 1984; 21: 338–348.

10.

Higginson I , Wade A , McCarthy M. Palliative care: views of patients and their families. Br J Med 1990; 301: 277–281.

11.

Lecouturier J , Jacoby A , Bradshaw C , Lovel T , Eccles M. Lay carers' satisfaction with community palliative care: results of a postal survey. Palliat Med 1999; 13: 275–283.

12.

Seale C. A comparison of hospice and conventional care. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 147–152.

13.

Wilkinson EK , Salisbury C , Bosanquet N , et al. Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 1999; 13: 197–216.

14.

Dawson NJ. Need satisfaction in terminal care setting. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 83–87.

15.

Greer DS , Mor V , Morris JN , Sherwood S , Kidder D , Birnbaum H. An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study. J Coron Dis 1986; 39: 9–26.

16.

Hughes SL , Cummings J , Weaver F , Manheim L , Braun B , Conrad K. A randomized trial of the cost effectiveness of VA hospital-based home care for the terminally ill. Health Serv Res 1992; 26: 801–817.

17.

Kane RL , Wales J , Bernstein L , Leibowitz A , Kaplan S. A randomised controlled trial of hospice care. Lancet 1984; 21: 890–895.

18.

Maeda M , Naito A , Sekiya Y , Watanabe M , Maruyama Y , Sasaki J. Evaluation by visiting nurse in end-stage cancers. Family questionnaire for patients who died after visiting nurse. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1997; 24: 533–536.

19.

Ozawa T. Satisfaction of bereaved families with the hospice services. Jpn J Clin Res Death Dying 1997; 20: 48–52.

20.

Tsunoda S , Matsumoto A , Kawamura K , et al. Impressions of the terminal care from the view point of the bereaved. Jpn J Hospice Palliat Care 1997; 7: 84–91.

21.

Tsutsumi Y , Kashima T , Nozoe S , Ushiyama Y. Terminal care for malignant tumors and family members' impressions on it in a university hospital. Shinshin-Igaku 1994; 34: 378–384.

22.

Yokota T , Tokashiki A , Ishizu H. A study of present situation in terminal care for patients and their families and of families' health problems. Shinshin-Igaku 1995; 35: 511–517.

23.

Statistics and Information Department, Minister%'s Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan: Juryo-kodochosa. Tokyo, 1999.

24.

Addington-Hall JM , MacDonald LD , Anderson HR , Freeling P. Dying from cancer: the views of bereaved family and friends about the experiences of terminally ill patients. Palliat Med 1991; 5: 207–214.

25.

Field D , McGaughey J. An evaluation of palliative care services for cancer patients in the southern health and social services board of Northern Ireland. Palliat Med 1998; 12: 83–97.

26.

McCusker J. The use of home care in terminal cancer. Am J Prev Med 1985; 1: 42–52.

27.

Parkes CM. Terminal care: evaluation of inpatient service at St. Christopher%'s Hospice Part II. Self assessments of effects of the service on surviving spouses. Postgrad Med 1979; 55: 523–527.

28.

Seale C , Kelly M. Comparison of hospice and hospital care for people who die: views of the surviving spouse. Palliat Med 1997; 11: 93–100.

29.

Wilkinson HJ. Assessment of patient satisfaction and hospice: a review and an investigation. Hosp J 1986; 2: 69–94.

30.

Kashiwagi T. Palliative care in Japan. Palliat Med 1991; 5: 165–170.

31.

Conill C , Verger E , Henriquez I , et al. Symptom prevalence in the last week of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 14: 328–331.

32.

Curtis EB , Krech R , Walsh TD. Common symptoms in patient with advanced cancer. J Palliat Care 1991; 7: 25–29.

33.

Donnelly S , Walsh D. The symptoms of advanced cancer. Sem Oncol 1995; 22(suppl 3): 67–72.

34.

Morita T , Tsunoda J , Inoue S , Chihara S. Contributing factors to physical symptoms in terminally-ill cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 18: 338–346.

35.

Vainio A , Auvinen A. Prevalence of symptoms among patients with advanced cancer: an international collaborative study. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996; 12: 3–10.

36.

Mercadante S , Dardanoni G , Salvaggio L , Anuess MG , Aguello A. Monitoring of opioid therapy in advanced cancer pain patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 13: 204–212.

37.

Wensing M , Grol R , Smits A. Quality judgments by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 45–53.

38.

Lasek RJ , Barkley W , Harper DL , Rosenthal GE. An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care 1997; 35: 646–652.

39.

Avis M , Bond M , Arthur A. Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 1995; 22: 316–322.