The ‘right kind’ of pain: talking about symptoms in outpatient oncology consultations

Abstract

Despite improvements in cancer management over the past 25 years, unrelieved symptoms continue to be reported. Little is known about how patients' problems and concerns are communicated to professionals during oncology treatment.

This qualitative study investigates the process of communication between cancer patients and oncologists during consultations in outpatient clinics of a regional teaching hospital. Data were collected by nonparticipant observation and audiotaping consultations. Analyses were by qualitative content analysis and conversation analysis. An objectives, strategies and tactics model was applied to organize the findings.

Seventy-four consultations between cancer patients and 15 doctors were observed and audiotaped. Pain talk is defined and identified as a substantial topic, occurring in 39 out of 74 consultations. Doctor-initiated questions are the predominant discourse feature and are prominent not only in initiating discussions but also in directing further talk (e.g. over three-quarters of doctor-initiated questions are in a closed form which focus narrowly on limited physical aspects of patients' pain). This limited information exchange is used alongside other communication tactics to identify the ‘right kind’ of pain that may benefit from cancer therapy and to truncate talk of problems perceived to be outside of this specialist remit.

Although individualized, holistic care is the expressed philosophy of the clinic, our data show that doctors tightly control the agenda to focus narrowly on pain which was amenable to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery or hormone manipulation. Inadequate exploration of patients' pain is likely to be detrimental to symptom control.

Keywords

communication pain neoplasms palliative care outpatients clinics,hospital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Whelan TJ , Mohide EA , Willan AR et al. The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center. Cancer 1997; 80: 1518–1524.

Sykes NP , Pearson SE , Chell S . Quality of care of the terminally ill: the carer's perspective. Palliat Med 1992; 6: 227–236.

Cleeland CS , Gonin R , Hatfield AK et al. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 592–596.

Larue F , Colleau SM , Brasseur L , Cleeland CS . Multicentre study of cancer pain and its treatment in France. Br Med J 1995; 307: 1034–1037.

Paice JA , Toy C , Shott S . Barriers to cancer pain relief: fear of tolerance and addiction. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998; 16: 1–9.

Furstenberg MA , Ahles TA , Whedon MB et al. Knowledge and attitudes of health-care providers toward cancer pain management: a comparison of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in the state of New Hampshire. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998;15: 335–349.

Chan A , Woodruff RK . Communicating with patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Care 1997; 13: 29–33.

Au E , Loprinzi CL , Dhodapkar M et al. Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2751–2755.

Ford S , Fallowfield L , Lewis S . Can oncologists detect distress in their out-patients and how satisfied are they with their performance during bad news consultations? Br Med J 1994; 70: 767–770.

10.

Higginson IJ , McCarthy M . Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staff's ratings reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 1993; 7: 219–228.

11.

Grande GE , Barclay SIG , Todd CJ . Difficulty of symptom control and general practitioners' knowledge of patients' symptoms. Palliat Med 1997; 11: 399–406.

12.

Stephens RJ , Hopwood P , Girling DJ , Machin D . Radomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings? Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 225–236.

13.

Passik SD , Dugan W , McDonald MV , Rosenfeld B , Theobald DE , Edgerton S . Oncologists' recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1594–1600.

14.

Newell S , Sanson-Fisher RW , Girgis A , Bonaventura A . How well do medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems? Cancer 1998; 83: 1640–1651.

15.

Atkinson S , Abu El , Haj M . Domain analysis for qualitative public health data. Health Policy Planning 1996; 11: 438–442.

16.

Silverman D . Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage, 1993: 115–143.

17.

Frankel RM . From sentence to sequence: understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Processes 1984; 7: 135–170.

18.

Drew P , Heritage J . Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In: Drew P , Heritage J eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992: 3–65.

19.

Heritage J . Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. In: Silverman, D ed. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage, 1997: 161–182.

20.

Sacks H . Everyone has to lie. In: Sanches M , Blount BG eds. Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic Press, 1975: 57–79.

21.

Todd CJ , Still AW . General practitioners' strategies and tactics of communication with the terminally ill. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 268–276.

22.

Still A , Todd C . When technical rationality fails: thinking about terminally ill patients. J Health Psychol 1998; 3: 137–148.

23.

Fairclough N . Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992: 137–168.

24.

Scambler G . Habermas and the power of medical expertise. In: Scambler G ed. Sociological theory and medical sociology. London: Tavistock, 1987: 165–193.

25.

Waitzkin H . The politics of medical encounters. How patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991: 29–48.

26.

Schon DA . From technical rationality to reflection-inaction. In: Dowie J , Elstein A eds. Professional judgement: a reader in clinical decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988: 60–77.

27.

McIntosh J . Communication and awareness in a cancer ward. London: Croom Helm, 1977: 42–70.

28.

Bloor M . On the routinised nature of work in people-processing agencies: the case of adenotonsillectomy assessments in ENT outpatient clinics. In: Davis A ed. Relationships between doctors and patients. Farnborough: Teakfield Ltd, 1978: 29–47.

29.

Mishler EG . The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984: 59–93.

30.

Aspach RR . Prognostic conflict in life-and-death decisions: the organization as an ecology of knowledge. J Health Soc Behav 1987; 28: 215–231.

31.

Maynard DW . Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. Am J Sociol 1991; 97: 448–495.

32.

Livneh J , Garber A , Shaevich E . Assessment and documentation of pain in oncology patients. Int J Palliat Nursing 1998; 4: 169–175.

33.

Stewart MA . What is a successful doctor–patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19: 167–175.

34.

Stewart M , Brown JB , Weston WW et al. Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995: 31–58.

35.

Fallowfield L . The ideal consultation. Br J Hosp Med 1992; 47: 364–367.

36.

Silverman D , Bloor M . Patient-centered medicine: some sociological observations on its constitution, penetration, and cultural assonance. In: Albrecht GL ed. Advances in medical sociology. A research manual. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990: 3–25.

37.

Psathas G . Conversation analysis: the study of talk-ininteraction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995: 70–78.