Background: The recent British Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on back pain highlighted the importance of primary care in the active management of acute back pain and, at the same time, recommended the establishment of rehabilitation services for those with subacute and chronic back pain.
Objective: To describe a new Back Management Service (BMS) in Exeter and to review the first year's results.
Methods: Analysis of observational data collected from the clinic and therapy database.
Assessments: Clinic outcome assessed by diagnostic and referral patterns as well as by general practitioner questionnaire. The Back Management Programme was assessed by Short Form 36 (SF36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HAD) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Results: In the first year 297 patients were seen in the clinic; clinic triage resulted in confirmation of primary care diagnosis in 235 (79%) of patients, with diagnosis revised in 62 (21%). One hundred and eighty-nine (63.6%) patients were referred for therapy. Of these, 54 were referred for one-to-one therapy and 135 were referred for multidisciplinary review with 29 patients subsequently recruited into the Back Management Programme for rehabilitation. Two out of three outcome measures were significantly improved at the end of the 36-hour, four-week course.
Conclusions: A Back Management Service can provide useful diagnostic reassessment of patients with chronic low back pain, and can focus therapeutic effort for the effective management of their pain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Klaber Moffett J , Richardson G , Sheldon TA , Maynard A . Back pain: its management and cost to society. Discussion paper 129. University of York, Centre for Health Economics: York Health Economics Consortium , l995.
2.
Clinical Standards Advisory Group . Management guidelines for back pain. London: HMSO , l994.
3.
Spitzer WO . Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians . Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spinel987; 12(7 Suppl): S8–S59 .
4.
Agency for Health Care Policy Research . Acute low back problems in adults. Publication no. 95-0642. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy Research , 1994.
5.
Frymoyer JW . Back pain and sciatica . N Engl J Medl988; 318: 291–300 .
6.
Loeser JD , Volinn E . Epidemiology of low back pain . Neurosurg Clin North Aml99l; 2: 713–718 .
7.
OPCS . The prevalence of back pain in Great Britain. A report on OPCS omnibus survey data. London: Department of Health, HMSO , l994.
8.
Walsh K. Epidemiological study of low back pain. Thesis, University of Southampton, l992.
9.
Spengler D , Bigos SJ , Martin NZ , Zeh J , Fisher L , Nachemson A . Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. 1. Overview and cost analysis . Spine1986; 11: 241–245 .
10.
Frank A . Low back pain . BMJl993; 306: 901–909 .
11.
Deyo RA , Diehl AK . Patient satisfaction with medical care for low back pain . Spinel986; 11: 28–30 .
12.
Williams AC de C , Nicholas MK , Richardson PH et al. Evaluation of a cognitive behavioural programme for rehabilitating with chronic pain . Br J Gen Practl993; 43: 513–518 .
13.
Frost H , Klaber Moffet JA , Moser JS , Fairbank JCT . Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for patients with low back pain . BMJl995; 310: 151–154 .
14.
Zigmond AS , Snaith RP . The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale . Acta Psychiatr Scand1983; 67: 361–370
15.
Garratt AM , Rata DA , Abdalla MI , Buckingham JK , Russell IT . The SF36 Health Survey Questionnaire; an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS . BMJl993; 306: 1440–1443 .
16.
Baker D , Pynsent PB , Fairbank JCT . The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: its reliability, repeatability and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas' disability index. In: Roland M , Jenner JR eds. Back pain. New approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester: Manchester University Press , 1989: 174–186.
17.
Little P , Smith L , Cantrell T , Langridge J , Pickering R . General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines . BMJl996; 312: 485–488 .
18.
Roland MO , Porter RW , Matthews JG , Redden JF , Simonds GW , Bewley B . Improving care: a study of orthopaedic outpatient referrals . BMJl99l; 302: 1124-1124 .
19.
Evans G , Richards S . Low back pain: an evaluation of therapeutic interventions. Bristol: Health Care Evaluation Unit, University of Bristol , l996.
20.
Flor H , Fydrick T , Turk DC . Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centres: a meta-analytic review . Painl992; 49: 221–230 .
21.
Deyo RA , Andersson G , Bombardier C et al. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain . Spinel994; 185: 2032S–2036S .
22.
Beurskens AJ , de Vet HC , Koke AJ , van dert Heijden GJ , Knipschild PG . Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain . Spine1995; 20: 1017–1028 .
23.
Hill PA , Hardy PAJ . The cost effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain management programme in a District General Hospital . The Pain Clinicl996; 9: 181–188 .
