Objective: To provide an overview of functional assessment measures for children with cerebral palsy, supporting the selection of measures and the interpretation of results from measures.
Methods: Instruments were selected on the basis of a literature search of the Medline, Sportdisk and PsychLIT databases.
Issues reviewed: Instruments were reviewed with respect to target group, purpose, nature, type and psychometric properties.
Results: In the literature 17 instruments that are used in paediatric rehabilitation and paediatric physical therapy to assess the functional motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy were found. While there is an urgent need for measures that can evaluate change in functional abilities, it was found that most measures are developed and validated for discriminative purposes.
Conclusions: Although instruments developed within the lastdecade meet psychometric criteria more adequately than those developed previously, it is concluded that only two evaluative assessment measures, the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), fulfil the criteria of reliability and validity with respect to responsiveness to change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Smits-Engelsman BCM. Het gebruik van motorische tests: praktijk en theorie. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother1995; 105: 130–136.
2.
Douwes Dekker LF. Evaluatie van instrumenten die funktionele motorische vaardigheden meten ingeval van hersenbeschadiging. Bewegen en Hulpverlening1990; 3: 240–256.
3.
Kirshner B, Guyatt GH. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis1985; 38: 27–36.
4.
Folio RM, Fewell RF. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Nashville: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1983.
5.
Bleck EE. Locomotor prognosis in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol1975; 17: 18–25.
6.
Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Gowland C et al. Manual for the Gross Motor Function Measure. Hamilton: McMaster University, 1993.
7.
Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Cadman DT et al. Issues in measuring change in motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a special communication. Phys Ther1990; 70: 125–131.
8.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.
9.
Granger CV, Gresham GE. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: William & Wilkins, 1984.
10.
Rothstein JM. Measurement in physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985.
11.
Coster WJ, Haley SM. Conceptualization and measurement of disablement in infants and young children. Infant Young Child1992; 4: 11–22.
12.
Jette AM. Outcomes research: shifting the dominant research paradigm in physical therapy. Phys Ther1995; 75: 965–970.
13.
Campbell SK. Measurement of motor performance in cerebral palsy. In: Forssberg H, Hirschfeld H eds. Movement disorders in children. Basel: Karger, 1992: 264–271.
14.
Rothstein JM. Disability and our identity. Phys Ther1994; 74: 375–378.
15.
Goldberg MJ. Measuring outcomes in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop1991; 11: 682–685.
16.
Haley SM, Coster W, Ludlow LH. Pediatric functional outcome measures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am1991; 2: 689–723.
17.
Gowland C, King G, King S et al. Review of selected measures in neurodevelopmental rehabilitation. (A rational approach for selecting clinical measures.) Neurodevelopmental Clinical Research Unit, Research Report no. 91–2. Hamilton: Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals.
18.
Boyce WF, Gowland C, Rosenbaum PL et al. Measuring quality of movement in cerebral palsy: a review of instruments. Phys Ther1991; 71: 813–819.
19.
Mitchell SK. Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychol Bull1979; 86: 376–390.
20.
Carmines EG, Zeller R. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, 1979.
21.
Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1994.
22.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J1965; 14: 61–65.
23.
Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1969.
24.
Browder DM. Assessment of individuals with severe handicaps. London: Harper & Row, 1987.
25.
Bruininks RH. Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, Minneapolis: American Guidance Service, 1978.
26.
Vermeer A. Assessment of functional motor behaviour in the daily life of cerebral palsied children. Int J Rehabil Res1989; 12: 452–454.
27.
Boyce WF, Gowland C, Hardy S et al. Development of a quality-of-movement measure for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther1991; 71: 820–832.
28.
Schoening HA, Anderegg L, Bergstrom D et al. Numerical scoring of self care status of patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1965; 46: 689–697.
29.
Miller IJ. Miller assessment for preschoolers. Littleton, CO: Foundation for Knowledge in Development, 1982.
30.
Johnson MK, Zuck FN, Wingate K. The Motor Age Test: measurement of motor handicaps in children with neuromuscular disorders such as cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg1951; 33: 698-698.
31.
Doudlah A. A Motor Development Checklist. Madison: Central Wisconsin Center, 1976.
32.
Henderson SE, Sugden DA. Movement Assessement Battery for Children. London: The Psychological Corporation, 1992.
33.
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH et al. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Boston: New England Medical Center Hospitals, 1992.
34.
Stott DH, Moyes FA, Henderson SE. The test of motor impairment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1984.
35.
Msall ME, Digaudio K, Rogers BT et al. The Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM): conceptual basis and pilot use in children with developmental disabilities. Clin Pediatr1994; 33: 421–430.
36.
Piper MC, Pinell LE, Darrah J et al. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Can J Public Health1992; 83: 46–50.
37.
Piper MC, Pinell LE, Darrah J et al. Early developmental screening: sensitivity and specificity of chronological and adjusted scores. J Dev Behav Pediatr1992; 13: 95–101.
38.
Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther1988; 68: 1077–1081.
39.
Gresham GE, Labi MLC. Functional assessment instruments currently available for documenting outcomes in rehabilitation medicine. In: Granger CV, Gresham GE eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: William & Wilkins, 1984: 65–85.
40.
Palmer FB, Shapiro BK, Wachtel RC et al. The effects of physical therapy on cerebral palsy. A controlled trial in infants with spastic diplegia. N Engl J Med1988; 318: 803–808.
41.
Mayo NE. The effect of physical therapy for children with motor delay and cerebral palsy. A randomized clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1991; 70: 258–267.
42.
Nellis L, Gridley BE. Review of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development – second edition. J School Psychol1994; 32: 201–209.
43.
Goldstein DJ, Fogle EE, Wieber JL et al. Comparison of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development – second edition and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with premature infants. J Psychoeduc Assessment1995; 13: 391–396.
44.
Vermeer A, Kruithof H, Zoggel B van. The Functional Motor Assessment Scale for children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Sci1995; 8: 94–98.
45.
Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT et al. The Gross Motor Function Measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol1989; 31: 341–352.
46.
Gowland C, Boyce WF, Wright V et al. Reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure. Phys Ther1995; 75: 597–602.
47.
Boyce WF, Gowland C, Rosenbaum PL et al. The Gross Motor Performance Measure: validity and responsiveness of a measure of quality of movement. Phys Ther1995; 75: 603–613.
48.
Jette AM. State of art in functional status assessment. In: Rothstein JM ed. Measurement in physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985: 137–168.
49.
Campbell SK. Assessment of the child with CNS dysfunction. In: Rothstein JM ed. Measurement in physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985: 207–228.
50.
Gevelinger M, Ottenbacher KJ, Tiffany T. The reliability of the Motor Development Checklist. Am J Occup Ther1988; 42: 81–86.
51.
Stokes NA, Deitz JL, Crowe TK. The Peabody Developmental Fine Motor Scale: an interrater reliability study. Am J Occup Ther1990; 44: 334–340.
52.
Gebhard AR, Ottenbacher KJ, Lane SJ. Interrater reliability of the Peabody Developmental Scales: fine motor scale. Am J Occup Ther1994; 48: 976–981.
53.
Palisano RJ, Kolobe TH, Haley SM et al. Validity of the Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Phys Ther1995; 75: 939–951.
54.
Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther1990; 70: 602–610.
55.
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Faas RM. A content validity study of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatr Phys Ther1991; 3: 177–184.
56.
Nichols DS, Case-Smith J. Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatr Phys Ther1996; 8: 15–24.
57.
Wright FV, Boschen KA. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI): validation of a new functional assessment outcome instrument. Can J Rehabil1993; 7: 41–42.
58.
Stott DH, Moyes FA, Henderson SE. The Test of Motor Impairment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1972.
59.
Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil1986; 1: 59–74.
60.
Ottenbacher KJ, Taylor ET, Msall ME et al. The stability and equivalence reliability of the Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM). Dev Med Child Neurol1996; 38: 907–916.
61.
Msall ME, Digaudio K, Duffy LC et al. WeeFIM; Normative sample of an instrument for tracking functional independence in children. Clin Pediatr1994; 33: 431–438.
