Objective: To assess the repeatability of two muscle function measures – leg extensor power (LEP) and isometric quadriceps force (IQF) – in a population of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Design: Repeat measures of LEP and IQF at 25° and 50° knee flexion were taken within seven days. Both legs were measured and a numerical rating scale was used to assess pain on the two occasions.
Subjects: Patients who were on a waiting list for a primary unilateral knee replacement for osteoarthritis were invited to take part in the study. Setting: The physiotherapy department of a National Health Service Orthopaedic Hospital in Oxford, UK.
Intervention: Subjects were measured using a Kin-Com dynamometer to assess maximum isometric force and a leg extensor power rig to assess maximum single leg explosive power.
Results: Twenty-six patients (mean age: 72 years; SD: 8 years; range: 50–87 years) were included in the study following informed consent. A weak relationship was found between LEP, IQF and pain scores which reached the 5% significance level for the LEP measures only. The level of repeatability for both measures was found to be acceptable.
Conclusion: Both LEP and IQF are recommended as repeatable measures for assessment of muscle function in patients with osteoarthitis of the knee. However, the LEP rig has the added advantage of being quicker, cheaper and simpler to use in the clinical setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan F. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. Arthritis Rheum1987; 30: 914–918.
2.
Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LRL, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol1990; 17: 1022–1024.
3.
Kremer E, Hampton Atkinson J, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain1981; 10: 241–248.
4.
Simonsen JC.Coefficient of variation as a measure of subject effort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 516–520.
5.
The Sports Council and the Health Education Authority. Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey. Northampton: Belmont Press, 1992.
6.
Bassey EJ, Short AH. A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity. Eur J Appl Physiol1990; 60: 385–390.
7.
Lamb SE, Morse RE, Grimley Evans J. Mobility after proximal femoral fracture: the relevance of leg extensor power, postural sway and other factors. Age Ageing1995; 24: 308–314.
8.
Bassey EJ, Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EF, Kelly M, Evans WM, Lipsitz LA. Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci1992; 82: 321–327.
9.
Norus'is MJ/SPSS Inc.SPSS for Windows, base system user's guide release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 1993: 190-190.
10.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986; i: 307–310.
11.
Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
12.
Steiner LA, Harris BA, Krebs DE. Reliability of eccentric isokinetic knee flexion and extension measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 1327–1335.
13.
Skelton DA, Greig CA, Davies JM, Young A. Strength, power and related functional ability of healthy people aged 65–89 years.Age Ageing1994; 23: 371–377.
