Objective: To examine the construct validity of three measures of knee extension strength obtained from elderly individuals.
Design: Retrospective and cross-sectional.
Setting: Home care.
Subjects: Forty-one consecutively treated patients (mean age 79.2 years).
Measures: Knee extension strength was measured using manual muscle testing, hand-held dynamometry, and the sit-to-stand test.
Results: Convergent construct validity was supported by the significant correlations between the measures (rs = 0.578–0.702). Discriminant construct validity was confirmed by the finding of significant differences in the manual muscle test scores and in the hand-held dynamometer measures of patients who were unable versus able to stand from a chair without the upper extremities or help. The sensitivity of the two measures for discriminating between patients able versus unable to stand from a chair was 90.9% for manual testing and 68.2% for dynamometry. The specificity was 78.9% for manual testing and 94.7% for dynamometry.
Conclusion: The results of this study show that the three measures employed to characterize knee extension strength are valid when employed with elderly patients in a home care setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A guide to physical therapist practice. Volume 1: A description of patient management. Phys Ther1995; 75: 707–764.
2.
Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing of the limbs: considerations, limitations and alternatives. Phys Ther Practice1992; 2: 11–21.
3.
Aitkens S, Lord J, Bernauer E, Fowler WM, Lieberman JS, Berck P. Relationship of manual muscle testing to objective strength measurements. Muscle Nerve1989; 12: 173–177.
4.
Beasley WC. Influence of method on estimates of normal knee extensor force among normal and postpolio children. Phys Ther Rev1956; 36: 21–42.
5.
Bohannon RW. Manual muscle test scores and dynamometer test scores of knee extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1986; 67: 390–392.
6.
Ellenbecker TS. Muscular strength relationship between normal grade manual muscle testing and isokinetic measurement of the shoulder internal and external rotators. Isokinetics Exerc Sci1996; 6: 51–56.
7.
Griffin JW, McClure MH, Bertorini TE. Sequential isokinetic and manual muscle testing in patients with neuromuscular disease. Phys Ther1986; 66: 32–35.
8.
Hayes KW, Falconer J. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry and its relationship with manual muscle testing in patients with osteoarthritis in the knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1992; 16: 145–149.
9.
Rabin SI, Post M. A comparative study of clinical muscle testing and Cybex evaluation after shoulder operations. Clin Orthop1990; 258: 147–156.
10.
Schwartz S, Cohen ME, Herbison GJ, Shah A. Relationship between two measures of upper extremity strength: manual muscle test compared to hand-held myometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 1063–1068.
11.
Bender JA, Kaplan, HM, Pierson JK. Relation between measured muscular force and success in selected tasks in physically handicapped patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1964; 45: 30–40.
12.
Hughes MA, Myers BS, Schenkman ML. The role of strength in rising from a chair in the functionally impaired elderlyJ Biomech1996; 29: 1509–1513.
13.
Bohannon RW, Smith J, Hull D, Palmeri D, Barnhard R. Deficits in lower extremity muscle and gait performance among renal transplant candidates. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 547–551.
14.
Reinking MF, Bockrath-Pugliese K, Warrell T, Kegerreis RL, Miller-Sayers K, Farr J. Assessment of quadriceps muscle performance by hand-held, isometric, and isokinetic dynamometry in patients with knee dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1996; 24: 154–159.
15.
Bohannon RW. Knee extension torque in stroke patients: comparison of measurements obtained with a hand-held and a Cybex dynamometer. Physiother Canada1990; 42: 284–287.
16.
Scott OM, Hyde SA, Goddard C, Dubowitz V. Quantitation of muscle function in children: a prospective study in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve1982; 5: 291–301.
17.
Bohannon RW. Hand-held dynamometer measurements obtained in a home environment are reliable but not correlated strongly with function. Int J Rehabil Res1996; 19: 345–347.
18.
Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Daniels and Worthingham's muscle testing, sixth edition. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1995: 207–210.
19.
Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system.London: HMSO, 1976: 1-1.
20.
Bohannon RW. Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Motor Skills1995; 80: 163–166.
21.
SYSTAT 6.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc, 1996.
