Objective: Evaluation of a therapy programme for stroke patients with apraxia. The programme is based on teaching patients strategies to compensate for the presence of apraxia. This programme was designed for assessment and treatment by occupational therapists.
Design: The outcome was studied in a pre–post test design. Measurements were conducted at baseline and 12 weeks later.
Subjects: Thirty-three stroke patients with apraxia were treated at occupational therapy departments in general hospitals, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes.
Main outcome measures: The following measurements were conducted: an apraxia test, a motor functioning test, observation of activities of daily living (ADL), Barthel Index, and an ADL questionnaire for the therapist and the patient.
Results: The patients showed large improvements in ADL functioning on all measures and small improvements on the apraxia test and the motor functioning test. The effect sizes for the disabilities, ranging from 0.92 to 1.06, were large compared to the effect sizes for apraxia (0.34) and motor functioning (0.19). The significant effect of treatment is also seen when individual improvement and subjective improvement are considered. Measured with the Barthel Index for instance, 71% of the patients improved.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the programme seems to be successful in teaching patients compensatory strategies that enable them to function more independently, despite the lasting presence of apraxia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Renzi E de. Apraxia. In: Boller F, Grafman J eds. Handbook of neuro-psychology, volume 2. Amsterdam: Elseviers Science, 1989.
2.
Kolb B, Whishaw IQ.Fundamentals of human neuropsychology, third edition. New York: Freeman, 1990.
3.
Renzi E de, Lucchelli F.Ideational apraxia. Brain1988; 111: 1173–1185.
4.
Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S.The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol1993; 50: 37–44.
5.
Tate RL, McDonald S.What is apraxia? The clinician's dilemma. Neuropsychol Rehabil1995; 5(4): 273–297.
6.
Pilgrim E, Humphreys GW. Rehabilitation of a case of ideomotor apraxia. In: Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW eds. Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.
7.
Berg IJ, Koning-Haanstra M, Deelman BG.Longterm effects of memory rehabilitation: A controlled study. Neuropsychol Rehabil1991; 1: 97–111.
8.
Randomski MV.Cognitive rehabilitation: Advancing the stature of occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther1994; 48: 271–273.
9.
Prigatano GP.Recovery and cognitive retraining after craniocerebral trauma. J Learning Disabil1987; 20: 603–613.
10.
Berg IJ. Memory rehabilitation for closed head injured patients [dissertation]. University of Groningen, Groningen, 1993.
11.
Zomeren AH van, Brouwer WH.Clinical neuropsychology of attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
12.
World Health Organization, Special Report. Stroke-1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Stroke1989; 20: 1407–1431.
13.
Crevel H van. Consensus cerebro vascular accident. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde1991; 135, 48: 2280–2288.
14.
Stehmann-Saris JC, Heugten CM van, Kinebanian A, Dekker J.Ergotherapie protocol voor diagnostiek en behandeling van apraxie bij CVA-patienten. Utrecht: NIVEL, Amsterdam: HVA, 1996.
15.
Heugten CM van, Dekker J, Deelman BG, Stehmann-Sairs JC, Kinebanian A. A diagnostic test for apraxia in stroke patients: internal consistency and diagnostic value. Submitted for publication.
16.
Heigten CM van, Dekker J, Deelman BG, Stehmann-Saris JC Kinebanian A. Assessment of disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia: internal consistency and inter-observer reliability. Submitted for publication.
17.
Wade DT.Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
18.
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V.The Barthel ADL index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud1988; 10: 61–63.
19.
Wade DT, Collin C.The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability?Int Disabil Stud1988; 10: 64–67.
20.
Whiting S, Lincoln NB.An ADL assessment for stroke patients. Br J Occup Ther1980; 43: 44–46.
21.
Lincoln NB, Edmans JA.A re-validation of the Rivermead ADL-scale for elderly patients with stroke. Age Ageing1990; 19: 9–24.
22.
Cohen J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. London: Academic Press, 1977.
23.
Jacobson NS, Follette WC, Revensdorf D, Baucom DH, Hahlweg K, Margolin G.Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioural marital therapy: a reanalysis of outcome data. J Consult Clin Psychol1984; 52: 497–504.
24.
Christensen L, Mendoza JL.A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behaviour Ther1986; 17: 305–308.
25.
Jacobson NS, Truax P.Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol1991; 59: 12–19.
