Objective: To compare results obtained using different procedures to measure 10-metre walking time.
Design: Walking was timed over a straight 10 m, and over 5 m with return. Further, the time taken to turn was measured directly.
Setting: Rehabilitation department of a university hospital.
Subjects: Patients who had walking disability after stroke.
Results: In the group of 43 patients, the time taken to walk 5 m and return was 3.3 (SD 5.0) s longer than the time to walk 10 m straight, but there was a large variation with some patients walking faster. The measured time to turn in a second group of 27 patients was 3.2 (SD 1.6) s. The times taken to walk 10 m straight and 5 m and return, and the time taken to turn were all highly correlated (r = 0.69 or more).
Conclusions: Timing walking over 5 m with a return is an acceptable alternative to the 10 m straight walk, but the actual time taken varies. On average, the walk with a turn is 3.2 s longer but in individual patients the difference may be much more or less. Sometimes the walk with a turn is even faster than that without.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bohannon RW. Selected determinants of ambulatory capacity in patients with hemiplegia. Clin Rehabil1989; 3: 47–53.
2.
Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, Clarke BM. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 583–587.
Stewart DA. The two-minute walking test. Clin Rehabil1990; 4: 23–27.
5.
Wade DT. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med1987; 19: 25–30.
6.
Collen FM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Studies1990; 12: 6–9.
7.
Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Studies1990; 12: 119–122.
8.
May D. The life-space diary: a measure of mobility in the old people at home. Int Rehabil Med1985; 7: 182–187.
9.
Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke1995; 26: 982–989.
10.
von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings E, Nickel VL. Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev1995; 34: 25–31.
11.
Wade DT, Collen FM, Robb GF, Warlow CP. Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. BMJ1992; 304: 609–613.
12.
Hill KD. Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 577–583.
