Objectives: To develop and evaluate a four-point scale visual gait assessment form, the Rivermead Visual Gait Assessment (RVGA), for clinical use with patients with neurological deficits.
Design: Preliminary clinical testing of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.
Setting: Patients were recruited from the Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre (RRC), a centre specializing in rehabilitation for patients with neurological disease.
Patients: Ten inpatients were assessed by up to seven physiotherapists for the main reliability study, and eight different patients were also assessed by two raters one week apart. Twenty outpatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were receiving physiotherapy to improve their mobility and 27 inpatients with various neurological conditions were also assessed and the data used to examine validity, reliability and sensitivity to change.
Outcome: The other comparative measures used were walking time, stride length, step length asymmetry, balance and the Rivermead Mobility Index.
Results: Inter-rater reliability between multiple raters was reasonable both for the global scores from the gait assessment form (Kendall's coefficient of concordance; p <0.001), and for individual items (complete agreement occurred on 63.8% of all observations). There was a significant correlation between the global RVGA score and the various criterion measures (r = 0.53–0.79; p <0.001) and between change in the RVGA score and change in walking time in patients who received treatment (r = 0.68; p <0.01).
Conclusions: The RVGA provides the clinician with a clinical assessment of the quality of gait which may be used in conjunction with other measures to inform and monitor the value of physiotherapy treatment for people with MS and stroke, and possibly other neurological deficits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Krebs DE, Edelstein JE, Fishman S. Reliability of observational kinematic gait analysis. Phys Ther1985; 65: 1027–1033.
2.
Patla AE, Proctor J, Morson B. Observations on aspects of visual gait assessment: a questionnaire study. Physiother Can1987; 39: 311–316.
3.
Ranchos Los Amigos Medical Center. Observational gait analysis handbook. Downey, CA: Los Amigos Research and Education Institute, 1989.
4.
Craik RL, Oatis CA. Gait assessment in the clinic: issues and approaches. In: Rothstein JM ed. Measurement in physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985: 170–201.
Hughes K, Bell F. Visual gait assessment of hemiplegic gait following stroke: pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 1100–1107.
7.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor relearning programme for stroke, second edition. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1987.
8.
Whittle M.Gait analysis. An introduction. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
9.
Rose J, Gamble JG. Human walking, second edition. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
10.
Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Studies1990; 12: 6–9.
11.
Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Studies1991; 13: 50–54.
12.
Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee SW, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health1992; 83: 7–11.
13.
Robinson JL, Schmidt GL. Quantitative gait evaluation in the clinic. Phys Ther1981; 61: 351–353.
14.
Lord SE, Wade DT, Halligan PW. A comparison of two physiotherapy approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil (in press).
15.
Tillotson KM, Burton K. Noninvasive measurement of lumbar sagittal mobility. Spine1991; 16: 29–33.
16.
Maclure M, Willet WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol1987:126: 161–169.
17.
Vaney C, Blaurock H, Gattlen PT, Meisels C. Assessing mobility in multiple sclerosis using the Rivermead Mobility Index and gait speed. Clin Rehabil1996; 10: 216–226.
