Objective: To determine whether the repositioning error of trunk flexion-extension in individuals with low back pain is different from that in those not experiencing low back pain when lifting and lowering external loads.
Design: A case-control study.
Setting: Physical therapy department of a medical centre.
Subjects: Twenty subjects with subacute low back pain and 20 control subjects without low back pain.
Interventions: Tasks with and without lifting and lowering an external load.
Main outcome measures: The trunk repositioning errors were measured with Measurand Shape Tape.
Results: In subjects with low back pain, trunk repositioning errors were significantly reduced when lifting and lowering an external load in the direction of flexion (3.779 ±1.26 degrees in a loaded condition versus 4.82±2.97 degrees in an unloaded condition; P B< 0.05) and extension (3.17±2.15 degrees in a loaded condition versus 5.039±3.74 degrees in an unloaded condition; p < 0.05). In control subjects, trunk repositioning errors were not significantly changed when lifting and lowering an external load in the direction of flexion (2.80±1.39 degrees in a loaded condition versus 2.63±1.24 degrees in an unloaded condition; p < 0.05) and extension (2.87±1.40 degrees in a loaded condition versus 3.15±1.50 degrees in an unloaded condition; P>0.05). The direction of motion (trunk flexion or extension) was not shown to be significant in this study.
Conclusion: Performing the task whilst lifting or lowering a submaximal load showed a reduced trunk repositioning error in subjects with subacute low back pain. Lifting and lowering a submaximal load might be considered as one of the rehabilitative strategies to hasten a return to work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE et al. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. Ergonomics1995; 38: 337-410.
2.
Konradsen L, Ravn JB, Sorensen AL. Proprioception at the ankle: the effect of anaesthetic blockade of ligament receptorsJ Bone Joint Surg Br1993; 75: 433-436.
3.
Konradsen L, Olesen, S, Hansen, HM. Ankle sensorimotor control and eversion strength after acute ankle inversion injuries. Am J Sports Med1998; 26: 72-77.
4.
Wilson SE, Granata KP. Reposition sense of lumbar curvature with flexed and asymmetric lifting postures. Spine2003; 28: 513-518.
5.
Laskowski ER, Newcomer-Aney K, Smith J. Proprioception. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2000; 11: 323-340.
6.
Gill KP, Callaghan MJ. The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain. Spine1998; 23: 371-377.
7.
Lam SK, Jull G. Treleaven J. Lumbar spine kinesthesia in patients with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1989; 29: 294-299.
8.
Newcomer K, Laskowski ER, Yu B, Larson DR, An KN. Repositioning error in low back pain. Comparing trunk repositioning error in subjects with chronic low back pain and control subjects. Spine2000; 25: 245-250.
9.
Newcomer K, Laskowski ER, Yu B, Johnson JC, An KN. Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects. Spine2000; 25: 2488-2493.
10.
O'Sullivan PB, Burnett A, Floyd AN et al. Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population. Spine2003; 28: 1074-1079.
11.
Kaplan FS, Nixon JE, Reitz M, Rindfleish L, Tucker J. Age-related changes in proprioception and sensation of joint position. Acta Orthop Scand1985; 56:72-74.
12.
Brumagne S, Lysens R, Swinnen S, Verschueren S. Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of lumbosacral spine. Spine1999; 24: 1328-1331.
13.
Newcomer K, Laskowski ER, Yu B, Johnson JC, An KN. The effects of a lumbar support on repositioning error in subjects with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 906-910.
14.
Taimela S, Kankaanpä M, Luoto S. The effect of lumbar fatigue on the ability to sense a change in lumbar position. Spine1999; 24: 1322-1327.
15.
Ashton-Miller JA, McGlashen KM, Schultz AB. Trunk positioning accuracy in children 7-18 years old. J Orthop Res1992: 10: 217-225.
16.
Moseley G L, Hodges P W, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine2002; 27: E29-E36.
17.
Thomas C ed. Proprioception. In Taber's cyclopedic medical dictionary, sixteenth edition. FA Davies, 1989: 638-638, 930-930, 1495-1495.
18.
Rosecrance JC, Cook TM, Golden NS. A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capacity in men with work-related low back injuries. J Occup Rehabil1991; 1: 197-205.
19.
Janda V. Muscles, central nervous motor regulation, and back problems. In Korr M ed. Neurobiology mechanisms in manipulative therapy. Plenum, 1986: 27-41.
20.
Soderberg GL, Barr JO. Muscular function in chronic low-back dysfunction. Spine1983; 8: 79-85.
21.
Lin YH, Chen CS, Chen WJ, Cheng CK. Characteristics of manual lifting activities in the patients with low back pain. Int J Ind Ergonom2002; 29: 101-106.
