Objective: To determine the reliability of a six-minute walk test in adults with cerebral palsy.
Design: Four repeated walk tests during two weeks.
Setting: The tests were conducted in a 40-m-long corridor at a rehabilitation centre for outpatients.
Subjects: Twenty-five adults (9 women and 16 men) with CP. Mean age 36 (26 58) years. Twelve subjects walked with walking aids and 13 without.
Interventions: No intervention.
Measures: The subjects were instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 min. The distance walked, heart rate and perceived exertion were assessed.
Results: Mean distances walked by the subjects in the four tests were 316, 336, 341 and 345 m. The repeatability between test 1 and the other tests was 66 m, and when the first walk test was excluded 40 m. The coefficient of variation (CV) between test 1 and the other tests varied between 7.1 and 8.7%, and when the first walk test was excluded between 3.7 and 4.5%. Intraclass correlation (ICC 1.1) was 0.97 in the four tests, and when the first walk test was excluded 0.99. Walking distance was longer (P<0.01) and varied less in subjects walking without walking aids (n=13) compared with subjects using walking aids (n=12).
Conclusions: Six-minute walk test showed high reliability, with a repeatability of 40 m. One practice test is recommended, as the walking distance in the first test was significantly shorter (P B=0.01) than the other three tests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Cathels BA, Reddihough D.The health care of young adults with cerebral palsy. Med J Aust1993; 159: 444-446.
2.
2 Ando N, Ueda S.Functional deterioration in adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 300-306.
3.
3 Bottos M, Feliciangeli A, Sciuto L, Gericke C, Vianello A.Functional status of adults with cerebral palsy and implications for treatment of children. Dev Med Child Neurol2001; 43: 516-528.
4.
4 Jahnsen R, Villien L, Stanghelle JK, Holm I.Fatigue in adults with cerebral palsy in Norway compared with the general population. Dev Med Child Neurol2003; 45: 296-303.
5.
5 Andersson C, Mattsson E.Adults with cerebral palsy: a survey describing problems, needs, and resources, with special emphasis on locomotion. Dev Med Child Neurol2001; 43:76-82.
6.
6 Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo NE.Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. A guide to enhanced clinical decision-making. Canadian Physiotherapy Association. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2002: 248-252.
7.
7 Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L.Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-minute walk test, Berg balance scale, Timed up and go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther2002; 82: 128-137.
8.
8 American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walking test. Committee on Profiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2002; 166: 111-117.
9.
9 Enright PL.The six-minute walk test. Respir Care2003; 48: 783-785.
10.
10 Cooper KH.A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. JAMA1968; 203: 135-138.
11.
11 McGavin CR, Gupta SP, McHardy GJR. Twelve-minute walking test for assessing disability in chronic bronchitis. BMJ1976; 1: 822-823.
12.
12 Butland RJA, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM.Two-, six-, and 12 minute walking tests in respiratory disease. BMJ1982; 284: 1607-1608.
13.
13 Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ et al. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J1985; 132: 919-923.
14.
14 Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S.A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest2001; 119: 256-270.
15.
15 Andersson C, Grooten W, Hellsten M, Kaping K, Mattsson E.Adults with cerebral palsy: walking ability after a progressive strength-training programme. Dev Med Child Neurol2003; 45: 220-228.
16.
16 Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B.Gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol1997; 39: 214-223.
17.
17 Borg GAV. Psychophysiological bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sport Exerc1982; 14: 377-381.
18.
18 Bland JM, Altman DG.Measurement error. BMJ1996; 313: 744-744.
19.
19 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL.Intra class correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull1979; 86: 420-428.
20.
20 Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR.Reliability of measurement of cervical spine range of motion. Comparisons of three methods. Phys Ther1991; 71: 98-106.
21.
21 Redelmeier DA, Bayoumi AM, Goldstein RS, Guyatt GH.Interpreting small differences in functional status: the six-minutes walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1997; 155: 1278-1282.
23 Gibbons WJ, Fruchter N, Sloan S, Levy RD.Reference values for a multiple repetition 6-minute walk test in healthy adults older than 20 years. Cardiopulm Rehabil2001; 21:87-93.
24.
24 Wu G, Sanderson B, Bittner V.The 6-minute walk test: how important is the learning effect?Am Heart J2003; 146: 129-133.
25.
25 Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST.Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured?Physiotherapy2000; 86:94-99.
26.
26 Bland M.An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, 1995: 266-269.
27.
27 Chinn S.Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax1991; 46: 454-456.
28.
28 Atkinson G, Nevill AM.Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med1998; 26: 217-238.
29.
29 Enright PL, Sherrill DL.Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1988; 158: 1384-1387.
30.
30 Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V et al. The six-minute walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest2003; 123: 387-398.
31.
31 Bean JF, Kiely DK, Leveille SG, Herman S, Huynh C, Frontera W.The six-minute walk test in mobility-limited elders: what is being measured?J Gerontol A Biol Sci2002; 57: 751-756.
32.
32 Guyatt GH, Pugsley SO, Sullivan MJ et al. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax1984; 39: 818-822.
