Objective: To determine whether the Timed Up and Go Test is useful at stratifying acutely unwell elderly inpatients according to their risk for subsequent falls.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Multidisciplinary acute care unit for the elderly at Liverpool Hospital, in Sydney, Australia.
Participants: A total of 2388 consecutive admissions to the unit of mean age 82 years.
Intervention: The Timed Up and Go, administered on admission to the unit, and two modifications (an ordinal scale and a dichotomous scale, both incorporating patients unable to complete the Timed Up and Go) were evaluated.
Main outcome measures: Number of falls, and reasons for the inability to complete the Timed Up and Go.
Results: During a median length of stay of nine days, 180 patients had at least one fall. The Timed Up and Go was unable to identify those patients who subsequently fell (P=0.78). When the Timed Up and Go was modified to include the majority of patients unable to complete the test, both the ordinal (range of values 1-8, odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03-1.21, P=0.01) and dichotomous (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.32, P=0.02) modifications significantly predicted falls in multivariate analyses. Patients unable to do the Timed Up and Go due to non-physical disability had the highest fall rate (11%), followed by those with physical disability (9%), while those able to do the Timed Up and Go had the lowest fall rate (6%) (P<0.001). Acutely unwell, immobile patients with dementia and delirium were not at excessive risk of falls.
Conclusion: In the acute care setting, the value of the Timed Up and Go lies in the inability to complete the test, and the reasons for this inability, rather than the time recorded.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Oliver D, Daly F, Martin FC, McMurdo ME. Risk factors and risk assessment tools for falls in hospital in-patients: a systematic review. Age Ageing2004; 33: 122-130.
2.
2 Gregg EW, Pereira MA, Caspersen CJ. Physical activity, falls, and fractures among older adults: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc2000; 48: 883-893.
3.
3 Vassallo M, Vignaraja R, Sharma JC, Briggs R, Allen SC. Predictors for falls among hospital inpatients with impaired mobility. J R Soc Med2004; 97: 266-269.
4.
4 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘up and gO’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 142-148.
5.
5 Okumiya K, Matsubayashi K, Nakamura T, Fujisawa M, Osaki Y, Doi Y, Ozawa T. The timed ‘up and gO’ test is a useful predictor of falls in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc1998; 46: 928-929.
6.
6 Lindsay R, James EL, Kippen S. The timed up and go test: unable to predict falls on the acute medical ward. Aust J Physiother2004; 50: 249-251.
7.
7 Halfon P, Eggli Y, Van Melle G, Vagnair A. Risk of falls for hospitalised patients: a predictive model based on routinely available data. J Clin Epidemiol2001; 54: 1258-1266.
8.
8 Porthouse J, Birks YF, Torgerson DJ, Cockayne S, Puffer S, Watt I. Risk factors for fracture in a UK population: a prospective cohort study. QJM2004; 97: 569-574.
9.
9 Hsieh FY. Sample size tables for logistic regression. Stat Med1989; 8: 795-802.
10.
10 Kerse N, Butler M, Robinson E, Todd M. Fall prevention in residential care: a cluster, randomised, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc2004; 52: 524-531.
11.
11 Jensen J, Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Fall and injury prevention in older people living in residential care facilities. A cluster randomised trial. Ann Intern Med2002; 136: 733-741.
12.
12 Kallin K, Jensen J, Olsson LL, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Why the elderly fall in residential care facilities, and suggested remedies. JFam Pract2004; 53:41-52.
13.
13 Ooi WL, Hossain M, Lipsitz LA. The association between orthostatic hypotension and recurrent falls in nursing home residents. Am J Med2000; 108: 106-111.
14.
14 Hamers JP, Gulpers MJ, Strik W. Use of physical restraints with cognitively impaired nursing home residents. JAdv Nurs2004; 45: 246-251.
15.
15 Capezuti E, Maislin G, Strumpf N, Evans LK. Side rail use and bed-related fall outcomes among nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc2002; 50:90-96.
16.
16 Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L. A review of physical restraint minimization in the acute and residential care settings. JAdv Nurs2002; 40: 616-625.
17.
17 Shorr RI, Guillen MK, Rosenblatt LC, Walker K, Caudle CE, Kritchevsky SB. Restraint use, restraint orders, and the risk of falls in hospitalised patients. J Am Geriatr Soc2002; 50: 526-529.
18.
18 Sadigh S, Reimers A, Andersson R, Laflamme L. Falls and fall-related injuries among the elderly: a survey of residential-care facilities in a Swedish municipality. J Community Health2004; 29: 129-140.
