Objective: To study the influence of non-standard controls on return to driving after disability, including prevalence of accidents/retraining difficulties.
Design: Postal questionnaires sent within two years of assessment to 972 disabled drivers seen over a three-year period.
Setting: Scottish Driving Assessment Service.
Subjects: All patients considered capable of driving after assessment during the study period.
Results: Five hundred and eighty-nine people (61%) replied who were representative of the total population (mean age 55 years, range 19-87); 73% were male and 70% were disabled for up to two years. Overall 79% respondents had returned to driving (highest reported success with standard manual car (86%) and lowest using left foot to accelerate and brake (66%) (χ2 = 16.6, P = 0.005)). A significantly higher proportion of the 30 patients (6.5%) admitting to accidents and 25 (5.4%) to problems with retraining were using non-standard driving techniques, especially the use of hand controls.
Conclusion: Disabled drivers returning to drive using non-familiar controls had lower success and a higher proportion of accidents and/or problems with retraining than people using conventional controls. If confirmed in larger studies this may have implications for policy-makers as well as specialist practitioners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Leigh-Smith J, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Driving after a stroke. J R Soc Med1986; 79: 200-203.
2.
2 Hawley CA. Return to driving after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2001; 70: 761-766.
3.
3 Schanke AK, Sundet K. Comprehensive driving assessment: neuropsychological testing and on-road evaluation of brain injured patients. Scand J Psychol2000; 41: 113-121.
4.
4 Korteling JE, Kaptein NA. Neuropsychological driving fitness tests for brain damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 138-146.
5.
5 Daniel J Cox, Warren CQ, Thorndike FP, Boris PK, George MD. Evaluating driving performance of outpatients with Alzheimer disease. J Am Board Fam Pract1998; 11: 264-271.
6.
6 Schultheis Maria T, Garay-Edward BS, Deluca J. The influence of cognitive impairment on driving performance in multiple sclerosis. Neurology2001; 56: 1089-1094.
7.
7 Dobbs AR. Evaluating the driving competence of dementia patients. Alzheimer's Dis Assoc Disord1997; 11 (suppl 1): 8-12.
8.
8 Mazer BL, Korner-Bitensky NA, Sofer S. Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 743-750.
9.
9 Van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH, Minderhoud JM. Acquired brain damage and driving; a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 697-705.
10.
10 Brooke MM, Questad KA, Paterson DR, Valois TA. Driving evaluation after traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1992; 71: 177-182.
11.
11 Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Inj1996; 10: 841-848.
12.
12 Kiyono Y, Hashizume C, Matsui N, Ohtsuka K, Takaoka K. Car driving abilities of people with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1389-1392.
13.
13 Shawaryn Maria A, Schultheis Maria T, Garay-Edward BS, Deluca J. Assessing functional status: exploring the relationship between the multiple sclerosis functional composite and driving. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 1123-1129.
14.
14 Anon. Fitness to drive and cognition. British Psychological Society, 2001.
15.
15 Anon. Car controls. Ricability, 2002: 1-49.
16.
16 The Stroke Association. Driving after a stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Stroke Association, 1997: 1-30.
17.
17 Anon. Driving after amputation: information for people who have had an amputation. MAGIC, 2001: 1-28.
18.
18 Thulin H, Nilsson G. Road traffic exposure, injury risks and injury consequences for different travel modes and age groups. VTI Report No. 390a, 1994.
