Intensification of the transition between inpatient neurological rehabilitation and home care of stroke patients. Controlled clinical trial with follow-up assessment six months after discharge
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2005
Intensification of the transition between inpatient neurological rehabilitation and home care of stroke patients. Controlled clinical trial with follow-up assessment six months after discharge
Objective: An intensified transition concept between neurological inpatient rehabilitation and home care was investigated for effects on the functional status of stroke patients and the physical and emotional health of their carers.
Design: Controlled clinical trial allocating patients to intervention group (intensified transition on ward II) or control group (standard transition on ward I); patients were allocated to whichever ward had a vacancy. Follow-up assessment was carried out six months after discharge.
Subjects: Seventy-one patients and their family carers were included, of which nine cases dropped out. Therefore 62 stroke patients with persisting disability and their family carers were available for assessment at follow-up - 33 patients in the intervention group, 29 patients in the control group.
Intervention: The intensified transition concept consisted of therapeutic weekend care, bedside teaching and structured information for relatives during the second phase of the rehabilitation.
Main measures: Patients were assessed with the Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure, Ashworth Spastic Scale, Frenchay Arm Test, and Timed Up and Go Test. The carers completed SF-36, and were assessed using the Giessen Symptom List, Depression Scale and Burden Scale for Family Caregivers.
Results: The intensified transition did not lead to significant change in the functional status of the patients or in the physical and emotional health of the family carers. Within the first four weeks after discharge, the patients in the intervention group had fewer new illnesses. In the observation period the use of outpatient care services was more frequent in the intervention group than in the control group.
Conclusion: Even though there are few differences of moderate intensity between the two groups the intensified transition programme does not affect either the functional status of the stroke patients or the health of the carers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Kolominsky-Rabas P, Heuschman PU, Neundo B. Epidemiologie des Schlaganfalls. Z Allgemeinmed2002; 78: 494-500.
2.
2 Wilkinson PR, Wolfe CDA, Warburton FG, Rudd AG, Howard RS, Ross-Russell RW, Beech RR. A long-term follow-up of stroke patients. Stroke1997; 28: 507-512.
3.
3 Dijkerman HC, Wood VA, Hewer RL. Long-term outcome after discharge from a stroke rehabilitation. J R Coll Phys Lond1996; 30: 538-546.
4.
4 Dennis M, O'Rourke S, Lewis S, Sharpe M, Warlow C. A quantitative study of the emotional outcome of people caring for stroke survivors. Stroke1998; 29: 1867-1872.
5.
5 Wyller TB, Thommessen B, Sødring KM, Sveen U, Pettersen AM, Bautz-Holter E, Laake K. Emotional well-being of close relatives to stroke survivors. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 410-417.
6.
6 Jungbauer J, Cramon von DY, Wilz G. Langfristige Lebensveränderungen und Belastungsfolgen bei Ehepartnern von Schlaganfallpatienten. Nervenarzt2003; 74: 1110-1117.
7.
7 Heier H, Lännler G, Steinhagen-Thiessen E. Evaluation eines psychoedukativen Kurses für Angehörige von Schlaganfallpatienten. Z Neuropsychol2002; 13: 201-219.
8.
8 Kerr SM, Smith LN. Stroke: an exploration of the experience of informal caregiving. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 428-436.
9.
9 Schmidt R. Pflegekonzept zur Anbahnung der häuslichen Wiedereingliederung. Die Schwester/Der Pfleger2001; 10: 814-819.
10.
10 Hansen FR, Spedtsberg K, Schroll M. Geriatric follow-up by home visits after discharge from hospital: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing1992; 21: 445-450.
11.
11 Schupp W. Konzept einer zustands- und behindertenangepaßten Behandlungs- und Rehabilitationskette in der neurologischen und neurochirurgischen Versorgung in Deutschland (‘Phasenmodell’). Nervenarzt1995; 66: 907-914.
12.
12 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J1965; 14:61-65.
13.
13 De Langen EG, Frommelt P, Wiedmann KD, Amann J. Messung der funktionalen Selbständigkeit in der Rehabilitation mit dem Funktionalen Selbständigkeitsindex (FIM). Rehabilitation1995; 43:iv-xi.
14.
14 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed Up & Go: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 142-148.
15.
15 Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther1987; 67: 206-207.
16.
16 De Souza LH, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arm function test. Int Rehabil Med1980; 2:3-9.
17.
17 Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1998.
18.
18 Brähler E, Scheer JW. Der Gießener Beschwerdebogen. GBB, Giessen Symptom List, second edition. Seattle: WA Huber, 1995.
19.
19 Zerrsen von D, Koeller DM. Depressivitä tsskala (D-S'). Weinheim: Beltz Test, 1976.
20.
20 Gräsel E, Chiu T, Oliver R. Development and Validation of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC). Toronto: Comprehensive Rehabil and Mental Health Services, 2003.
21.
21 Andersen HE, Eriksen K, Brown A, Schultz-Larsen K, Forchhammer BH. Follow-up services for stroke survivors after hospital discharge - a randomized control study. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 593-603.
