Objective: To evaluate the effect of an arm training programme combining repetition of unilateral and symmetrical bilateral tasks for people in the subacute phase after stroke.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Inpatient functional rehabilitation unit.
Subjects: Forty-one people who had had a stroke, in the subacute phase, receiving conventional arm occupational and physical therapy, were randomized to an experimental group (n=20) and a control group (n=21).
Interventions: In addition to the usual arm therapy in the rehabilitation unit, the experimental group received an arm therapy programme (15-20 45-min sessions) based on repetition of unilateral and symmetrical bilateral tasks. The control group received additional usual arm therapy of a similar duration and frequency to the experimental treatment.
Main measures: The effect of the programme was judged on the basis of: (1) arm impairments (motor function, grip strength, gross and fine manual dexterity and motor co-ordination), (2) arm disabilities in tasks related to daily activities, and (3) functional independence in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL).
Results: Although both experimental and control groups of participants improved similarly during the study period, the statistical analyses did not show any difference between the groups at the end of the treatment for the different dependent variables evaluated: (1) arm impairments: p=0.43-0.79; (2) arm disabilities: p=0.16-0.90; and (3) functional independence: p=0.63 and 0.90.
Conclusions: An arm training programme based on repetition of unilateral and symmetrical bilateral practice did not reduce impairment and disabilities nor improve functional outcomes in the subacute phase after stroke more than the usual therapy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke1992; 23: 1084-1089.
2.
2 Sollerman C, Sperling L. Evaluation of ADL function, especially hand function. Scand J Rehabil Med1978; suppl 6: 139-143.
3.
3 Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Roy PM, Guay M. Performance of the unaffected upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke1996; 27: 1564-1570.
4.
4 Marque P, Felez A, Puel M et al. Impairment and recovery of left motor function patients with right hemiplegia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1997; 62:77-81.
5.
5 Logigian MK, Samuels MA, Falconer J, Zagar R. Clinical exercices trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 364-367.
6.
6 Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finalyson MAJ et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 267-272.
7.
7 Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham, R. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther1986; 66: 1233-1238.
8.
8 Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PCW et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med1990; 22:1-8.
9.
9 Buterfisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci1995; 130:59-68.
10.
10 Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Upper extremity retraining following stroke: effects of bilateral practice. J Neuro Rehabil1996; 10: 167-184.
11.
11 Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke?Dis Rehabil2000; 22:23-37.
12.
12 Whitall J, McCombe S, Waller S, Silver KHC, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke2000; 31: 2390-2395.
13.
13 Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1993; 56: 241-244.
14.
14 Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 347-354.
15.
15 Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?Stroke2000; 31: 2984-2988.
16.
16 van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke1999; 30: 2369-2375.
17.
17 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor releaming programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 361-369.
18.
18 Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G, Hummelsheim H. Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 723-730.
19.
19 Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA2004; 292: 1853-1861.
20.
20 Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination. J Clin Psychiatry1987; 48: 314-318.
21.
21 Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke1993; 24:58-63.
23 Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1983; 46: 521-524.
24.
24 de Weerdt W, Lincoln NB, Harrison MA. Prediction of arm and hand function recovery in stroke patients. Int J Rehabil Res1987; 10 (suppl 5): 110-112.
25.
25 Fullerton KJ, Mackenzie G, Stout RW. Prognostic indices in stroke. Q J Med1988; 66: 147-162.
26.
26 Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor learning model for stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy1989; 75: 372-380.
27.
27 Wolf SL, LeCraw DE, Barton LA. Comparison of motor copy and targeted biofeedback training techniques for restitution of upper extremity function among patients with neurologic disorders. Phys Ther1989; 69:17-33.
28.
28 Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I-A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med1975; 7:13-31.
29.
29 Dutil É, Arsenault AB, Corriveau H, Prévost R. Protocole d'évaluation de la fonction sensorimotrice: Test de Fugl-Meyer. Centre de recherche IRM et École de Réadaptation, Universitéde Montréal, Montréal, Québec, 1989.
30.
30 Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil É. Normative data for grip strength of elderly men and women. Am J Occup Ther1995; 49: 637-644.
31.
31 Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil É. Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip measurements in a healthy population. Scand J Rehabil Med1995; 27: 137-143.
33 Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil É, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 751-755.
34.
34 Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther1985; 39: 386-391.
35.
35 Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol1948; 32: 234-247.
36.
36 Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil É. The Purdue Pegboard test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. Dis Rehabil1995; 17: 217-224.
37.
37 Courtois G. É léments de neurologie pratique. Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1981.
38.
38 Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil, É. Upper extremity motor coordination of healthy elderly people. Age Ageing1995; 24: 108-112.
39.
39 Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Dutil É, Bravo G. Development and reliability of an upper extremity function test for the elderly: the TEMPA. Can J Occup Ther1993; 60:9-16.
40.
40 Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Dutil É, Bravo G, Mercier, L. Validity of a measurement instrument for upper extremity performance: the TEMPA. Occup Ther J Res1994; 14: 267-281.
41.
41 Heinemann AW, Linacre MJ, Wright BD, Hamilton B. Relationship between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 566-573.
42.
42 Doble S. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a process skills assessment. Occup Ther J Res1991; 11:8-23.
43.
43 Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock JE, Erbraugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry1961; 4: 561-571.
44.
44 Liu M,Domen K, Chino N. Comorbidity measures for stroke outcome research: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 78: 166-172.
45.
45 Basmajian JV, Gowland C, Brandstater ME, Swanson L, Trotter J. EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1982; 63: 613-616.
46.
46 Winstein CJ, Rose DR, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 620-628.
47.
47 Hanlon RE. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 811-815.
48.
48 Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor learning model for stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy1989; 75: 372-380.
