Objective: To examine the prevalence of swelling and oedema of the hand in stroke patients and relationships with impairments and disability.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting: Stroke unit at Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, the Netherlands.
Subjects: Eighty-eight adult stroke patients who were admitted for clinical rehabilitation during one year (2000).
Measurements and methods: Assessment took place two weeks after admission to the rehabilitation centre. Degree of swelling was measured with a hand volumeter and oedema was defined as a volumeter score deviating more than two standard deviations from the expected score derived from population data. Further assessment included tonus (Modified Ashworth Score), sensibility, tactile inattention, carefulness, and motor function (Utrecht Arm/Hand Test). Arm disability was measured with Frenchay Arm Test and Nine-hole Peg Test.
Results: Some degree of hand swelling was present in 72.7% and oedema in 33.0% of our patients. Swelling and oedema were significantly more often seen in patients with hypertonic fingers and impaired sensibility. Patients with hand oedema had significantly worse Frenchay Arm Test and Nine-hole Peg Test scores.
Conclusions: Swelling and oedema of the hand are common among stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Exton-Smith AN, Crockett DJ. Nature of oedema in paralysed limbs of hemiplegic patients. BMJ1957; 30: 1280-1283.
2.
2 Tepperman PS, Greyson ND, Hilbert L, Jimenez J, Williams JI. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1984; 65: 442-447.
3.
3 Post MWM, Visser-Meily JMA, Boomkamp-Koppen HGM, Prevo AJH. Determination of oedema in stroke patients: comparison between visual inspection by therapists and volumetric assessment. Disabil Rehabil2003: 25: 1265-1270.
4.
4 Faghri PD. The effects of neuromuscular stimulation-induced muscle contraction versus elevation on hand edema in CVA patients. J Hand Ther1997; 10: 29-34.
5.
5 Guidice ML. Effects of continuous passive motion and elevation on hand oedema. Am J Occup Ther1990; 44: 914-921.
6.
6 Vasialiauskas R, Dijkers M, Abela MB, Lundgren L. Characteristics in addition to size of the contralateral hand predict hand volume but are not clinically useful. J Hand Ther1995; 8: 258-263.
7.
7 van Velze CA, Kluever I, van der Merwe CA, Mennen U. The difference in volume of dominant and nondominant hands. J Hand Ther1991; 4:5-9.
8.
8 Stern EB. Volumetric comparison of seated and standing test postures. Am J Occup Ther1991; 45: 801-805.
9.
9 Warlow CP, Dennis MS, Van Gijn J, Sandercock PAG, Bamford JM, Wardlaw JM. Stroke. a practical guide to management. Oxford: Blackwell, Science1996.
10.
10 Braus DF, Kraus JK, Strobel J. The shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke: a prospective clinical trial. Ann Neurol1994; 36: 728-733.
11.
11 Geurts ACH, Visschers BAJT, Limbeek van J, Ribbers GM. Systematic review of aetiology and treatment of post-stroke hand oedema and shoulder-hand syndrome. Scand J Rehabil Med2000; 32:4-10.
12.
12 Dirette D, Hinojosa F. Effects of continuous passive motion on the edematous hands of two persons with flaccid hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther1994; 48: 403-409.
13.
13 Roper TA, Redford S, Tallis RC. Intermittent compression for the treatment of the oedematous hand in hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing1999; 28:9-13.
14.
14 Gracies J-M, Marosszeky JE, Renton R, Sandanam J, Gandevia SC, Burke D. Short-term effects of dynamic Lycra Splints on upper limb in hemplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000: 81: 1547-1555.
15.
15 Davies PM. Steps to follow with hemiplegia, second edition. Berlin: Springer, 2000.
16.
16 van Heugten CM. Rehabilitation after stroke. Guidelines for professionals. Den Haag: Dutch Heart Assocation2001.
17.
17 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J1965; 14:61-65.
18.
18 Eccles MV. Hand volumetrics. Br J Phys Med1956: 19:5-8.
19.
19 Boland B, Adams R. Development and evaluation of a precision forearm and hand volumeter and measuring cylinder. J Hand Ther1996; 9: 349-358.
20.
20 Waylett-Rendall J, Seibly DS. A study of the accuracy of a commercially available volumeter. J Hand Ther1991; 4:10-13.
21.
21 King THI. The effect of water temperature on hand volume during volumetric measurement using the water displacement method. J Hand Ther1993; 6:202-204.
22.
22 van Reenen ETh, Post MWM, Visser-Meily JMA, Prevo AJH. A bedside test for upper extremity impairment after stroke: validity and reliability of the Utrecht Arm/Hand Test in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. Unpublished.
23.
23 Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia; a neurophysiological approach. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
24.
24 Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther1987; 67: 206-207.
25.
25 van Reenen Eth, Post, MWM. Hand consultation protocol. Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Utrecht, 2003.
26.
26 Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
27.
27 Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1987; 50: 714-719.
28.
28 Croarkin E, Danoff J, Barnes C. Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke. Phys Ther2004: 84: 62-74.
29.
29 Poulin de Courval L, Barsauskas A, Berenbaum B et al. Painful shoulder in the hemiplegic and unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 673-676.
30.
30 Lo S-F, Chen, S-Y, Lin, H-C et al. Arthrographic and clinical findings in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003: 84: 1786-1791.
