Objective: To determine the extent to which three forms of multidisciplinary team (MDT) care in stroke rehabilitation meet the standards set by the United Kingdom National Service Framework (NSF).
Design: Consecutive assessment of the three forms of care was completed.
Subjects: The study included three groups of 25 stroke inpatients on the stroke rehabilitation ward.
Intervention: (1) A standard weekly MDT meeting using a standard form for documentation; (2) a standard MDT meeting using a newly devised form; and (3) a novel MDT ward round using the new form, and attended by doctors.
Results: MDT ward rounds result in significantly better consideration of patients' needs (median 7 per patient compared with 0 and 5 in phases one and two), enhanced SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time framed) goal-setting (median 3 per patient compared to 1 in phases one and two); greater patient involvement (12 patients compared to 0 and 4 in phases one and two); and improved team working (measured using the team climate inventory) than do MDT meetings.
Conclusions: In the present study, standard weekly MDT meetings did not meet the standards set for MDT care by the NSF. The use of a MDT ward round allows these standards to be achieved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 The Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. BMJ1997; 314: 1151-1159.
2.
2 Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 1999.
3.
3 Department of Health. National Service Framework for older people: modern standards and service models. London: Department of Health, 2001.
4.
4 Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. National sentinel audit for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2002.
5.
5 Sulch D, Evans A, Melbourn A, Kalra L. Does an integrated care pathway improve processes of care in stroke rehabilitation? A randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing2002; 31: 175-179.
6.
6 Sulch D, Melbourn A, Perez I, Kalra L. Integrated care pathways and quality of life on a stroke rehabilitation unit. Stroke2002; 33: 1600-1604.
7.
7 Mahoney FI, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J1965; 14:56-61.
8.
8 Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. Scott Med J1957; 2: 200-215.
9.
9 Anderson N, West M. Team Climate Inventory: manual and user's guide. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1994.
