Objective: To compare two different exercise programmes versus a control group, after lumbar disc surgery.
Design: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study.
Setting: Outpatient clinic of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Subjects: Sixty patients diagnosed as having single level lumbar disc herniation with clinical examination and MRI evaluation and who had undergone lumbar discectomy (post-operative first month) at a single level. Patients with serious pathologies involving the cardiac and respiratory systems that could prevent them from doing exercises were excluded.
Intervention: The patients were randomly split into three groups. The first group received an intensive exercise programme and back school education while the second group received a home exercise programme and back school education. The third group was defined as the control group and did not receive education or exercise.
Main measures: The patients were evaluated at the beginning and end of the treatment with clinical parameters, pain levels, endurance tests and weight-lifting tests, modified Oswestry Disability Index, Beck Depression Inventory, Low Back Pain Rating Scale and return to work.
Results: The groups doing exercises experienced a decrease in the severity of pain and disability, also functional parameters showed better improvement than the control group. The intensive exercise programme was better than the home exercise programme.
Conclusions: It seems that intensive exercise is more effective in reduction of pain and disability, but whether it is cost-effective is not clear.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Rosomoff RS. Back school programs. The pain patient. Occup Med1992; 7: 93-103.
2.
2 Waddell G, Gibson JNA, Grant I. Surgical treatment of lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar disc disease. In: Nachemson AL, Johnsson E eds. Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000: 305-325.
3.
3 Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW. Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy?Spine2000; 25: 1523-1532.
4.
4 Waddell G. Failure of disc surgery and repeat surgery. Acta Orthop Belg1987; 53: 300-302.
5.
5 Donceel P, Du Bois M. Fitness for work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study. Eur Spine J1998; 7:29-35.
6.
6 Hurme M, Alaranta H. Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine1986; 9: 933-938.
7.
7 Hides HJ, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Jull GA, Cooper DH. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acuteu subacute low back pain. Spine1994; 19: 165-172.
8.
8 Adams MA, McNally DM, Chinn H, Dolan P. Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine. International Society of Biomechanics Award Paper. Clin Biomech1994; 9:5-14.
9.
9 Stokes MJ, Young A. The contribution of reflex inhibition to arthrogenous muscle weakness. Clin Sci1984; 67:7-14.
10.
10 Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine1999; 24: 1023-1028.
11.
11 Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E. Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine2000; 25: 1015-1020.
12.
12 Carragee EJ, Han MY, Yang B, Kim DH, Kraemer H, Billys J. Activity restrictions after posterior lumbar discectomy. A prospective study of outcomes in 152 cases with no postoperative restrictions. Spine1999; 24: 2346-2351.
13.
13 Saal JA, Saal JS. Postoperative rehabilitation and training. Subacute spinal disorders. In: Mayer TG, Mooney V, Gatchel RF eds. Contemporary conservative care for painful spinal disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger1991: 318-327.
14.
14 Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Green PA, Jones PL. Chronic low back pain. Spine1994; 19: 881-887.
15.
15 LindströmI,Öhlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Nachemson A. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. Spine1992; 17: 641-652.
16.
16 Curtis L, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part III: Isokinetic and isoinertial capacity. Spine1994; 19: 401-405.
17.
17 Matheson LN. Evaluation of lifting, In: Liebenson C ed. Rehabilitation of the spine: a practitioner's manual. Pennsylvania: Williams and Wilkins1996: 143-151.
18.
18 Ito T, Shirado O, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kaneda K, Strax TE. Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: An inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77:75-79.
19.
19 Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen A. A revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. In: Roland MO, Jenner JR eds. Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989: 187-204.
20.
20 Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A. Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain1994; 57: 317-326.
21.
21 Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry1961; 4:53-63.
22.
22 DuruözMT, Özcan E, Ketenci A, Karan A, Kiralp MZ. Cross cultural validation of the Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (RODQ) in a Turkish population, Arthr Rheumat1999; 42 (09 Suppl): 270-270.
23.
23 McKenzie RA. The lumbar spine. New Zealand: Spinal Publications, 1981.
24.
24 Williams PC. The lumbosacral spine: emphasizing conservative management. New York: McGraw-Hill1965.
25.
25 Manniche C, Skall HF, Braendholt L et al. Clinical trial of postoperative dynamic back exercises after first lumbar discectomy. Spine1993; 18:92-97.
26.
26 Ankjaer-Jensen A, Manniche C, Nielsen H. Postoperative rehabilitation of patients operated for lumbar disc prolapse. An analysis of the socioeconomic consequences. Ugeskr-Laeger1994; 156: 647-652.
27.
27 Johannsen F, Remvig L, Kryger P et al. Supervised endurance exercise training compared to home training after first lumbar discectomy: a clinical trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol1994; 12: 609-614.
28.
28 Kjellby-Wendt G, Carlsson SG, Styf J. Results of early active rehabilitation 5-7 years after surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech2002; 15: 404-409.
