Objective: To investigate the test–retest reliability of measures of strength, balance, gait and functional performance when used with older people following hip fracture.
Subjects: Thirty people (16 hospital inpatients and 14 community dwellers).
Design: Subjects underwent two assessments: one day apart for the hospital inpatients and one week apart for the community dwellers.
Measurement: Strength (dynamometer, sphygmomanometer, spring balance, lateral step-up ability), balance (sway-meter, Functional Reach Test, single leg stance time, Step Test), gait (timed 6-m walk with steps taken, base of support and step length), and functional performance (PPME total score and timed supine-to-sit and sit-to-stand) were measured.
Results: Eleven of the 14 continuously scaled measurement tools achieved excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.75) for one or more tests. A hand-held dynamometer was found to be the tool with the highest test–retest reliability for measuring hip muscle strength (ICC (3,1) 0.86 for affected hip abduction). For measurement of knee extension strength, a spring balance (ICC (3,1) 0.94 affected leg) was the most reliable. For testing balance, the Step Test (ICC (3,1) 0.94 for stepping with affected leg) and Functional Reach Test (ICC (3,1) 0.89) had the highest test–retest reliability. The ICC (3,1) values were 0.97 for walking velocity (comfortable pace) and 0.96 for the total score of the Physical Performance and Mobility Examination.
Conclusion: The test–retest reliability of a number of simple measures of physical performance is excellent when used with this population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Marks R, Allegrante JP, Ronald MacKenzie C, Lane JM. Hip fractures among the elderly: causes, consequences and control. Ageing Res Rev2003; 2: 57–93.
2.
2 Marottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM, Jr. Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc1992; 40: 861–866.
3.
3 Hauer K, Specht N, Schuler M, Bartsch P, Oster P. Intensive physical training in geriatric patients after severe falls and hip surgery. Age Ageing2002; 31: 49–57.
4.
4 VanSwearingen J, Brach J. Making geriatric assessment work: selecting useful measures. Phys Ther2001; 81: 1233–1252.
5.
5 Madsen OR, Lauridsen UB. Knee extensor and flexor strength in elderly women after hip fracture: assessment by the Cybex 6000 dynamometer of intra-rater inter-test reliability. Scand J Rehabil Med1995; 27: 219–226.
6.
6 Bohannon RW. Intertester reliability of hand-held dynamometry: a concise summary of published research. Percept Mot Skills1999; 88: 899–902.
7.
7 Bandinelli S, Benvenuti E, Del Lungo I et al. Measuring muscular strength of the lower limbs by hand-held dynamometer: a standard protocol. Aging Clin Exp Res1999; 11: 287–293.
8.
8 Kwoh CK, Petrick MA, Munin MC. Inter-rater reliability for function and strength measurements in the acute care hospital after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res1997; 10: 128–134.
9.
9 Kaegi C, Thibault MC, Giroux F, Bourbonnais D. The interrater reliability of force measurements using a modified sphygmomanometer in elderly subjects. Phys Ther1998; 78: 1095–1103.
10.
10 Lord SR, Ward JA, Williams P, Anstey KJ. Physiological factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women. J Am Geriatr Soc1994; 42: 1110–1117.
11.
11 Berg K. Balance and its measure in the elderly: a review. Physiother Can1989; 41: 240–246.
12.
12 Anstey KJ, Smith GA, Lord S. Test–retest reliability of a battery of sensory motor and physiological measures of aging. Percept Mot Skills1997; 84: 831–834.
13.
13 Rooks DS, Kiel DP, Parsons C, Hayes WC. Self-paced resistance training and walking exercise in community-dwelling older adults: effects on neuromotor performance. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci1997; 52: M161–M68.
14.
14 Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol1990; 45: M192–M97.
15.
15 Giorgetti MM, Harris BA, Jette A. Reliability of clinical balance outcome measures in the elderly. Physiother Res Int1998; 3: 274–283.
16.
16 Hill KD, Bernhardt J, McGann AM, Maltese D, Berkovits D. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiother Can1996; 48: 257–262.
17.
17 Fox KM, Felsenthal G, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI, Magaziner J. A portable neuromuscular function assessment for studying recovery from hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 171–176.
18.
18 Friedman PJ, Richmond DE, Baskett JJ. A prospective trial of serial gait speed as a measure of rehabilitation in the elderly. Age Ageing1988; 17: 227–235.
19.
19 Bohannon RW. Physical performance measures for the elderly rehabilitated at home. Int J Rehabil Res1997; 20: 107–109.
20.
20 Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age-and gender-related test performance in community dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther2002; 82: 128–137.
21.
21 Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 306–314.
22.
22 Fried AV, Cwikel J, Ring H, Galinsky D. ELGAM – extra-laboratory gait assessment method: identification of risk factors for falls among the elderly at home. Int Disabil Stud1990; 12: 161–164.
23.
23 VanSwearingen JM, Paschal KA, Bonino P, Yang JF. The modified Gait Abnormality Rating Scale for recognizing the risk of recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly adults. Phys Ther1996; 76: 994–1002.
24.
24 Ward G, Macaulay F, Jagger C, Harper W. Standardised assessment: a comparison of the Community Dependency Index and the Barthel Index with an elderly hip fracture population. Br J Occup Ther1998; 61: 121–126.
25.
25 Jaglal S, Lakhani Z, Schatzker J. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the lower extremity measure for patients with a hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am2000; 7: 955–962.
26.
26 Maljanian R, Bohannon R, Kaehrle P. Practical measure for evaluating functional outcomes post hip fracture. Int J Rehabil Res2000; 23: 135–137.
27.
27 Overend TJ, Chesworth BM, Sandrin M, Stroud S, Petrella RJ, McCalden R. Determination of prefracture physical function in communitydwelling people who fracture their hip. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2000; 55: M698–M702.
28.
28 Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Skovron ML. A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: II. Validity and reliability. J Orthop Trauma2000; 14:26–30.
29.
29 Wright JG, Young NL, Waddell JP. The reliability and validity of the Self-Reported Patient-Specific Index for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2000; 82A: 829–837.
30.
30 Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methods. Clin Orthop2001; 390: 163–172.
31.
31 Guccione AA, Fagerson TL, Anderson JJ. Regaining functional independence in the acute care setting following hip fracture. Phys Ther1996; 76: 818–826.
32.
32 Winograd CH, Lemsky CM, Nevitt MC et al. Development of a physical performance and mobility examination. J Am Geriatr Soc1994; 42: 743–749.
33.
33 Arnadottir SA, Mercer VS. Effects of footwear on measurements of balance and gait in women between the ages of 65 and 93 years. Phys Ther2000; 80:17–27.
34.
34 McMahon LM, Burdett RG, Whitney SL. Effects of muscle group and placement site on reliability of hand-held dynamometry strength measurements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1992; 15: 236–242.
35.
35 Ross M. Test–retest reliability of the lateral step-up test in young adult healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1997; 25: 128–132.
36.
36 Sherrington C, Lord SR. Home exercise to improve strength and walking velocity after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 78: 208–212.
37.
37 Duncan PW, Studenski S, Chandler J, Prescott B. Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. J Gerontol1992; 47: M93–M98.
38.
38 Ostir GV, Volpato S, Fried LP, Chaves P, Guralnik JM. Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: results from the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol2002; 55: 916–921.
40 Chambers R. ICC. 1.0 ed.Sydney: Department of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney.
41.
41 Fleiss J. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
42.
42 Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas1960; 20:37–46.
43.
43 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33: 159–174.
44.
44 Bohannon RW, Lusardi MM. Modified sphygmomanometer versus strain gauge hand-held dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991; 72: 911–914.
45.
45 Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Corcoran DS, Phillips CE, Sannes TL. Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry: effects of rater gender, body weight, and grip strength. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1992; 16:74–81.
46.
46 Desrosiers J, Prince F, Rochette A, Raiche M. Reliability of lower extremity strength measurements using the belt-resisted method. J Aging Phys Act1998; 6: 317–326.
47.
47 Nadler SF, DePrince ML, Hauesien N, Malanga GA, Stitik TP, Price E. Portable dynamometer anchoring station for measuring strength of the hip extensors and abductors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 1072–1076.
48.
48 Brouwer B, Culham EG, Liston RA, Grant T. Normal variability of postural measures: implications for the reliability of relative balance performance outcomes. Scand J Rehabil Med1998; 30: 131–137.
49.
49 Haas BM, Whitmarsh TE. Inter-and intra-tester reliability of the Balance Performance Monitor in a non-patient population. Physiother Res Int1998; 3: 135–147.
50.
50 Keysor JJ, Jette AM. Have we oversold the benefit of late-life exercise?J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2001; 56: M412–M23.
51.
51 Luukinen H, Koski K, Laippala P, Kivela SL. Predictors for recurrent falls among the homedwelling elderly. Scand J Prim Health Care1995; 13: 294–299.
