Introduction: This paper describes the development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Handicap Scale for Children (HSC). This questionnaire is based on the London Handicap Scale (LHS), a valid and reliable utility instrument for measuring social participation in adults.
Methods: A multidisciplinary research group was involved in developing the HSC. The questionnaire was tested in 114 children with a chronic disease and 239 healthy children in the 8-18 age range. Relating the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) attributes to corresponding HSC scores tested the assumption that a negative health status would lead to participation problems.
Results: Questionnaire development resulted in a five-dimension questionnaire: mobility, physical independence, daily activities, social integration and orientation. Each dimension included one item with a six-point response scale. A higher score indicates greater handicap. Feasibility testing with 10 children showed that none of the children experienced difficulties in filling in the questionnaire. Conceptual validity, measured by correlations between the dimensions of the HSC and HUI3, was satisfactory. As expected, moderate correlation coefficients between predefined pairs of HUI and HSC attributes were found; other correlation coefficients were low. Criterion validity was also satisfactory, as shown by large differences between the healthy and the chronically ill group and by several criteria within the chronically ill group.
Conclusion: Based on this initial evaluation, the questionnaire seems feasible and valid for use with children in the age range 8-18 years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 orld Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: WHO, 1980.
2.
2 orld Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
3.
3 orrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ1986; 5:1-30.
4.
4 arwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care1994; 3:11-16.
5.
5 arwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1994; 57: 825-829.
6.
6 iser C, Morse R. Can parents rate their child's health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Qual Life Res2001; 10: 347-357.
7.
7 iser C, Morse R. Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess2001; 5:1-157.
8.
8 heunissen NC, Vogels TG, Koopman HM et al. The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res1998; 7: 387-397.
9.
9 uillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol1993; 46: 1417-1432.
10.
10 Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, Hatcher J. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res1995; 4: 249-257.
11.
11 Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Abel T et al. Quality of life in children and adolescents: a European public health perspective. Soz Praventivmed2001; 46: 294-302.
