The influence of contractures and variation in measurement stretching velocity on the reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with severe brain injury
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2005
The influence of contractures and variation in measurement stretching velocity on the reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with severe brain injury
Objective: To determine the influence of contractures and different stretching velocities on the reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in patients with severe brain injury and impaired consciousness.
Design: Cross-section observational study.
Setting: A rehabilitation centre for adult persons with neurological disorders.
Subjects: Fifty patients with impaired consciousness due to severe cerebral damage of various aetiologies.
Measurement protocol: Three experienced and trained medical professionals rated each patient in a randomized order once daily for two consecutive days. Shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee and ankle spasticity were assessed by the use of the MAS with different stretching velocities. The presence of contractures was assessed by a goniometer.
Main outcome measures: Retest and inter-rater reliability (kw= weighted kappa) of the MAS.
Results: The retest reliability of the MAS was good (shoulder joints (kw0.74), elbow joints (kw0.74), wrist joints (kw 0.72), knee joints (kw 0.72), ankle joints (kw 0.77)) and the inter-rater reliability was moderate (shoulder joints (kw 0.49), elbow joints (kw0.52), wrist joints (kw 0.51), knee joints (kw 0.54) ankle joints (kw 0.49)). The presence of contractures significantly influenced the reliability of MAS in shoulder and wrist joints. No influence of stretching velocity on the reliability of the MAS was found.
Conclusion: In patients with impaired consciousness due to severe brain injury the MAS has good retest, but only limited inter-rater, reliability. The presence of contractures may influence reliability of the MAS, but stretching velocity does not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner1964; 192: 540-542.
2.
2 Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Inter-rater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther1987; 67: 206-207.
3.
3 Johnson GR. Measurement of spasticity. In: Barnes M, Johnson G eds. Upper motor neuron syndrome and spasticity. Clinical management and neurophysiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 79-95.
4.
4 Nuyens G, De Weerdt W, Ketelaer P. Inter-rater reliability of the Ashworth Scale in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil1994; 8: 286-292.
5.
5 Smith AW, Jamshidi M, Lo SK. Clinical measurement of muscle tone using a velocity-corrected modified Ashworth scale. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2002; 81: 202-206.
6.
6 Haas BM, Bergstrom E, Jamous A, Bennie A. The inter-rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord1996; 34: 560-564.
7.
7 Brashear A, Zafonte R, Corcoran M et al. Inter-and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 1349-1354.
8.
8 Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP et al. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 1013-1016.
9.
9 Blackburn M, van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther2002; 82:25-34.
10.
10 Allison SC, Abraham LD, Petersen CL. Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of plantarflexor muscle spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury. Int J Rehabil Res1996; 19: 67-78.
11.
11 Sloan RL, Sinclair E, Thompson J, Taylor S, Pentland B. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Int J Rehabil Res1992; 15: 158-161.
12.
12 Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI et al. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 373-383.
13.
13 Yarkony GM, Sahgal V. Contractures. A major complication of craniocerebral trauma. Clin Orthop1987; 93-96.
14.
14 Pohl M, Rockstroh G, Rückriem S et al. Measurement of the effect of a bolus dose of intrathecal baclofen by continuous measurement of force under fibreglass casts. J Neurol2002; 249: 1254-1262.
15.
15 Boyd R, Ada L. Physiotherapy management of spasticity. In: Barnes M, Johnson G eds. Upper motor neuron syndrome and spasticity. Clinical management and neurophysiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 96-121.
16.
16 Masur H. Skalen und Scores in der Neurologie. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme Verlag, 2000.
17.
17 Freivogel S. Befunderhebung. In: Freivogel S ed. Motorische Rehabilitation nach Schä delhirntrauma. Klinik/Grundlagen/Therapie. Munchen: Richard Pflaum Verlag, 1997: 178-188.
18.
18 Pohl M, Mehrholz J. A new shoulder range of motion screening measurement-its reliability and application in the assessment of the prevalence of shoulder contractures in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004.
19.
19 Cohen J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull1968; 70: 213-220.
20.
20 Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ1992; 304: 1491-1494.
21.
21 Armitage PTC. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Chichester: Wiley, 1998.
22.
22 Bakheit AM, Maynard VA, Curnow J, Hudson N, Kodapala S. The relation between Ashworth scale scores and the excitability of the alpha motor neurones in patients with post-stroke muscle spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2003; 74: 646-648.
23.
23 Lance J. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman R, Young R, Koelia P eds. Spasticity. Disordered motor control. Miami, FL: Symposia Specialists,1980: 485-500.
24.
24 Smith A, Kirtley C, Jamshidi M. Intrarater reliability of manual passive movement velocity in the clinical evaluation of knee extensor muscle tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 1428-1431.
25.
25 Hufschmidt A, Mauritz K. Chronic transformation of muscle in spasticity: a peripherical contribution to increased tone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1985; 48: 676-685.
26.
26 O'Dwyer NJ, Ada L, Neilson PD. Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke. Brain1996; 119: 1737-1749.
27.
27 Pinedo S, de la Villa FM. Complications in the hemiplegic patient in the first year after the stroke. Rev Neurol2001; 32: 206-209.
28.
28 Trudel G, Uhthoff HK. Contractures secondary to immobility: is the restriction articular or muscular? An experimental longitudinal study in the rat knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81:6-13.
29.
29 Pandyan AD, Price CI, Barnes MP, Johnson GR. A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 290-293.
30.
30 Held J, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Reeducation Motrice des Affections Neurologiques. JB Baille`re et fils, 1969.
31.
31 Ward AB. Assessment of muscle tone. Age Ageing2000; 29: 385-386.
32.
32 Pandyan AD, Price CI, Rodgers H, Barnes MP, Johnson GR. Biomechanical examination of a commonly used measure of spasticity. Clin Biomech2001; 16: 859-865.
