Background and purpose: There are widespread regional variations in the institutionalization rate after stroke. This study sought to identify the factors that predict institutionalization after a primary diagnosis of stroke and determine whether institutionalization rate could be used to assess the quality of hospital care.
Methods: A retrospective case note audit of 2778 consecutive admissions with stroke, between 1 September and 31 October 2000 from a randomly selected sample of 79 hospitals in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Data were collected on demographics, case-mix, clinical outcome, organization of discharge, and place of residence at discharge and at three and six months. The figures from this audit were validated using data from the 1998 National Sentinel Audit of Stroke.
Results: Overall 14% of patients previously living at home were discharged to nursing or residential homes. Using logistic regression, Barthel Index score at discharge accounted for 40% of variation. Two-thirds of patients with a discharge Barthel score of B=5 were institutionalized. Age alone explained 14% and when taken together with discharge Barthel and length of stay it accounted for 54% of variation. On admission 22% of the variation in institutionalization rate could be accounted for by total Glasgow Coma Score (15, B=15), age and ability to walk unaided. Regional variations in institutionalization rates are evident and may in part be explained by differences in ease of access to the institutions.
Conclusions: Discharge disability and older age were the dominant factors determining admission to nursing and residential homes. It is not possible to predict sufficiently reliably for an individual patient the likelihood of institutionalization at admission or at 72 h after admission, to justify early resource allocation decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Wolfe C, Rudd T, Beech R. Stroke Services and Research: an overview, with recommendations for future research. London: The Stroke Association, 1996.
2.
2 Mant J, Wade D, Winner S. Health Care Needs Assessment: The epidemiologically based needs reviews: Stroke2002. Accessed from http://hcna.%20radcliffe-oxford.com/strframe.htm
3.
3 Bosanquet N, Franks P. Stroke care: reducing the burden of disease. London: The Stroke Association, 1998.
4.
4 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Survey of Disability in Great Britain. Report No. 1. London: HMSO, 1985.
5.
5 Newnham DM, Berrington A, Primrose WR, Seymour DG. Self Funding and Community Care Admissions to Nursing Homes in Aberdeen. Health Bull1996; 54, 301–306.
6.
6 Hutchinson-S-G, Tarrant-J, Severs-M-P. An in-patient bed for acute nursing home admissions. Age Ageing1998; 27:95–98.
7.
7 Rudd AG, Irwin P, Rutledge Z, Lowe D, Wade DT, Pearson MG. Regional variations in stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 562–72.
8.
8 Young JE, Forbes WF, Hirdes JP. The association of disability with long term care institutionalisation of the elderly. Can J Ageing1994; 13:15–29.
9.
9 Smith Black B, Rabins PV, German PS. Predictors of nursing home placement among elderly public housing residents. The Gerontologist1999; 39: 559–68.
10.
10 Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kannel WB, Sytkowski P. Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalisation following stroke: The Framingham Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69: 415–18.
11.
11 Bauer EJ. Transitions from home to nursing home in a capitated long term care program: the role of individual support systems. Health Serv Res1996; 31: 309–26.
12.
12 Aneshensel CS, Pearlin LI, Levy-Storms L, Schuler RH. The transition from home to nursing home mortality among people with dementia. J Gerontol B Psychol Soc Sci2000; 55: S152–62.
13.
13 Counsell C, Dennis M, Mc Dowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke2002; 33: 1041–47.
14.
14 Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. A multidisciplinary stroke audit package, second edition. London: Clinical Effectiveness & Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, 2002.
15.
15 Wolfe CDA, Taub NA, Woodrow J, Richardson E, Warburton FG, Burney PGJ. Does the incidence or case fatality of stroke vary in southern England?J Epidemiol Community Health1993; 47: 139–43.
16.
16 European Stroke database website. http://%20www.ncl.ac.uk/stroke-research-unit/esdb/%20esdbmain.htm
17.
17 Irwin P, Rudd A. Casemix and process indicators of outcome in stroke: the Royal College of Physicians minimum data set for stroke. J R Coll Physicians Lond1998; 32: 442–44.
18.
18 Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Warlow C et al. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxford Community Stroke project 1981-1986. Methodology, demography and incident cases of first ever stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1988; 51: 1373–80.
19.
19 Nagelkerke NJD. A note on the general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika1991; 78: 691–92.
20.
20 Rudd AG, Irwin P, Rutledge Z, Lowe D, Morris R, Pearson MG. The national sentinel audit of stroke: a tool for raising standards of care. J R Coll Physicians1999; 30: 460–64.
21.
21 Grundy E. Sociodemographic variations in rates of movement into institutions among elderly people in England and Wales: an analysis of linked census and mortality data 1971-1985. Population Stud1992; 46:65–84.
22.
22 Townsend P. The last refuge: A survey of residential institutions and homes for the aged in England and Wales. London: G Bell, 1962.
23.
23 Grundy E, Glaser K. Trends in, and transitions to, institutional residence among older people in England and Wales 1971-1991. J Epidemiol Community Health1997; 51: 531–40.
24.
24 Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
25.
25 Van der Ploeg RJO, Oosterhuis HJGH, Reuvekamp J. Measuring muscle strength. J Neurol1984; 231: 200–203.
