Background: The opportunity to attend a cardiac rehabilitation course is usually offered to patients who have suffered a myocardial infarction. However, despite referral, many patients fail to attend.
Objective: To elicit patients' beliefs about the role of the cardiac rehabilitation course following myocardial infarction.
Design: Qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews.
Setting: London Teaching Hospital.
Subjects: Thirteen patients were interviewed after discharge from hospital following myocardial infarction, but prior to attendance at cardiac rehabilitation.
Main outcome measures: Patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation that may act as barriers to attendance.
Results: Themes identified included: the content of cardiac rehabilitation, perceptions of exercise, benefits of cardiac rehabilitation, explicit barriers to attendance and cardiac knowledge. Whilst some patients viewed cardiac rehabilitation as an important and necessary part of recovery others expressed doubt that it was appropriate for them. Some patients were uncertain of the course content and misunderstood the role of exercise and its perceived effects. Misconceptions with regard to cardiac knowledge were also apparent. The combination of erroneous beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation and cardiac misconceptions seemed to result in doubts regarding attendance.
Conclusions: Prior to course attendance some patients hold erroneous beliefs about the course content, especially the exercise component. Co-existent cardiac misconceptions are also apparent. Further research is needed to clarify the extent to which these beliefs may contribute to the decision not to attend cardiac rehabilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 'Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusef S et al.An overview of randomised trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation1989; 80: 234-244.
3 etrie KJ, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J. Role of patients' view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: longitudinal study. BMJ1996; 312: 1191-1194.
4.
4 ooper A, Lloyd G, Weinman J, Jackson G. Why patients do not attend cardiac rehabilitation? The role of intentions and illness beliefs. Heart1999; 82: 234-236.
5.
5 des PA, Waldman ML, McCann WJ, Weaver SO. Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation in older coronary patients. Arch Intern Med1996; 152: 1033-1035.
6.
6 eventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The common sense representation of illness danger. In: Rachman S ed. Contributions to medical psychology. New York: Pergamon Press, 1980: 17-30.
7.
7 eventhal H, Meyer D, Steele D. Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Singer J eds. A handbook of psychology and health. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984: 219-252.
8.
8 Horne R. Representations of medication and treatment: advances in theory and measurement. In: Petrie K, Weinman J eds. Perceptions of illness and health: current research and applications. London: Harwood Academic, 1997: 155-187.
9.
9 Horne R, Weinman J. Self-regulation and self-management in asthma: exploring the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in explaining nonadherence to preventer medication. Psychol Health2002; 17:17-32.
10.
10 Thornhill M, Stevens JA. Client perceptions of a rural-based cardiac rehabilitation program: a grounded theory approach. Aust J Rural Health1998; 6: 105-111.
11.
11 Tod AM, Lacey AA, McNeill F. ‘I'm still waiting’: barriers to accessing cardiac rehabilitation services. JAdv Nurs2002: 40: 421-431.
12.
12 Moore SM. Women's views of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil1996; 16: 123-129.
13.
13 Wyer SJ, Earll L, Joseph S, Harrison J. Deciding whether to attend a cardiac rehabilitation programme: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Coronary Health Care2001; 5: 178-188.
14.
14 Smith JA, Flowers P, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. In: Material discourses of health and illness. London: Routledge, 1997: 68-91.
15.
15 Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Murray M, Chamberlain K eds. Qualitative health psychology. London: Sage, 1999.
16.
16 Thompson DR, Bowman GS, Kitson AL, de Bono DP, Hopkins A. Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom guidelines and audit standards. Heart1996; 75:89-93.
17.
17 Horne R. Patients' beliefs about treatment: the hidden determinant of treatment outcome?J Psychosom Res1999; 47: 491-495.
19 Thomas RJ, Miller NH, Lamendola C et al. National survey on gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation programs: Patient characteristics and enrollment patterns. J Cardiopulm Rehabil1996; 16: 402-412.
