Objective: To develop an intervention, using the first three phases of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex interventions, to facilitate coping skills in new carers of stroke patients.
Methods: In the preclinical (theoretical) phase, a theoretically based framework for a small group course for carers of people with stroke was developed. The intervention was grounded in a cognitive behavioural model and included carers' needs identified from a literature review. Phase I (modelling phase) comprised a qualitative study involving one-to-one semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of informal carers of people with stroke. Following this, the intervention was modified. In phase II (exploratory phase), the modified intervention was delivered by a clinical psychologist and stroke nurse practitioner to five carers. Following postcourse interviews the course was further refined and delivered to seven new carers who subsequently completed a satisfaction questionnaire.
Results: Carers' needs identified from the literature included information provision; managing emotions; social support; health maintenance; and practical problem solving. Consultation with existing carers confirmed these as important issues with a strong emphasis on finding niches of control in life, becoming an expert carer, and dealing with emotional upheaval. Participants reported feeling more optimistic and empowered subsequent to the course.
Conclusions: The MRC framework provided a useful methodology for the development of a complex intervention. The course aimed to assist carers to regain control over aspects of their lives and manage their emotions. It was feasible to run and acceptable to carers; however a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is required to evaluate its effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Carers UK. Missed opportunities: the impact of new rights for carers. London: Carers UK, 2003.
2.
2 Pownoll M. Survey shows haphazard provision of UK stroke services. BMJ1999; 318: 1098-1098.
3.
3 O'Mahony P, Thomson R, Dobson R, Rodgers H, James O. The prevalence of stroke and related disability. J Public Health Med1999; 21: 166-171.
4.
4 Geddes J, Fear J, Tennant A, Pickering A, Hillman M, Chamberlain M. Prevalence of self reported stroke in a population in northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health1996; 50: 140-143.
5.
5 Kelson M, Ford C. Stroke rehabilitation: patient and carer views. Report by the Royal College of Health for the Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1998.
6.
6 Royal College of Physicians. National guidelines for stroke: update 2002. London: Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke, 2002.
7.
7 Low JTS, Payne S, Roderick P. The impact of stroke on informal carers: a literature review. Soc Sci Med1999; 49: 711-725.
8.
8 Han B, Haley WE. Family care-giving for patients with stroke: review and analysis. Stroke1999; 30: 1478-1485.
9.
9 Evans R, Bishop D, Haselkorn J. Factors predicting satisfactory home care after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991; 72: 144-147.
10.
10 Greveson GC, James OFW. Improving long-term outcome after stroke: the views of patients and carers. Health Trends1991; 23: 161-162.
11.
11 Rodgers H, Bond S, Curless R. Inadequacies in the provision of information to stroke patients and their families. Age Ageing2001; 30: 129-133.
12.
12 Murray J, Young J, Forster A, Ashworth R. Developing a primary care-based stroke model: the prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers. Br J Gen Pract2003; 53: 803-807.
13.
13 Sholte OP, Reimer WJM, de Haan RJ, Rijnders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos GAM. The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors. Stroke1998; 29: 1605-1611.
14.
14 Davis LL, Grant JS. Constructing the reality of recovery: family homecare management strategies. Ad Nurs Sci1994; 17:66-76.
15.
15 Murray J, Ashworth R, Forster A, Young J. Developing a primary care-based stroke service: a review of the qualitative literature. Br J Gen Pract2003; 53: 153-142.
16.
16 Lomer M, McLellan DL. Informing hospital patients and their relatives about stroke. Clin Rehabil1987; 1:33-37.
17.
17 Mant J, Carter J, Wade DT, Winner S. The impact of an information pack on patients with stroke and their carers: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 465-476.
18.
18 Evans RL, Matlock A-L, Bishop DS, Stranahan S, Pederson C. Family intervention after stroke: does counselling or education help?Stroke1988; 19: 1243-1249.
19.
19 Rodgers H, Atkinson C, Bond S, Suddes M, Dobson R, Curless R. Randomized controlled trail of a comprehensive stroke education program for patients and caregivers. Stroke1999; 30: 2585-2591.
20.
20 Downes B, Rooney V, Roper-Hall A, Oyebode J, Mayer P, Main A. The effectiveness of counselling stroke survivors and their carers in the community. Age Ageing1993; 22(suppl 3): 28-28.
21.
21 Van den Heuvel ET, de Witte LT, Nooyen-Haazen I, Sanderman R, Meyboom-deJong B. Short-term effects of a group support program and an individual support program for caregivers of stroke patients. Patient Educ Counselling2000; 40: 109-120.
22.
22 Van den Heuvel ETP, de Witte LP, Stewart RE, Schure LM, Sanderman R, Mayboom-deJong B. Long-term effects of a group support program and an individual support program for informal caregivers of stroke patients: which caregivers benefit the most?Patient Educ Counselling2002; 47: 291-299.
23.
23 Clark M, Rubenach S, Winsor A. A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 703-712.
24.
24 Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, Melbourn A, Patel A, Knapp M, Donaldson NTraining care givers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial, BMJ2004; 328: 1099-1101.
25.
25 Dennis M, O'Rourke S, Slattery J, Staniforth T, Warlow C. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ1997; 314: 1071-1077.
26.
26 Mant J, Carter J, Wade DT, Winner S. Family support for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2000; 365: 808-813.
27.
27 Lincoln N, Francis V, Lilley S, Sharma J, Summerfield M. Evaluation of a stroke family support organiser: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke2003; 34: 116-121.
28.
28 Grant JS, Elliott TR, Weaver M, Bartolucci AA, Giger JN. Telephone intervention with family caregivers of stroke survivors after rehabilitation. Stroke2002; 33: 2060-2065.
29.
29 Forster A, Young J. Specialist nurse support for patients with stroke in the community: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ1996; 312: 1642-1646.
30.
30 Christie D, Weigall D. Social work effectiveness in two-year stroke survivors: a randomised controlled trial. Community Health Stud1984; 8:26-32.
31.
31 Knapp P, Young J, House A, Forster A. Non-drug strategies to resolve psychosocial difficulties after stroke. Age Ageing2000; 29:23-30.
32.
32 Hanger H, Wilkinson T. Stroke education: can we rise to the challenge?Age Ageing2001; 30: 113-114.
33.
33 Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council, 2000.
34.
34 Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
35.
35 DeRubeis RJ, Tang TZ, Beck AT. Cognitive therapy. In: Dobson K ed. Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies. New York: Guilford Press, 2001: 349-392.
36.
36 Hoyt M, Miller S. Stage-appropriate change-oriented therapy strategies. In: Carlson J, Sperry L eds. Brief therapy with individuals and couples. Phoenix, AZ: Zeig, Tucjer & Theisen, 2000: 289-330.
37.
37 Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG. A population-based assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke1995; 26: 843-849.
38.
38 Dennis M, O'Rourke S, Lewis S, Sharp M, Warlow C. A quantitative study of the emotional outcome of people caring for stroke survivors. Stroke1998; 29: 1867-1872.
39.
39 Kuzel A. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: W Miller ed. Doing qualitative research. Newbury: Sage, 1990.
40.
40 Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory principles and procedures. Newbury: Sage, 1990.
41.
41 Grant JS, Elliot TR, Giger JN, Bartolucci AA. Social problem-solving telephone partnerships with family caregivers of persons with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res2001; 24: 181-189.
42.
42 Department of Health. Caring about carers: a national strategy for carers. London: Department of Health, 1999.
43.
43 Bugge C, Alexander H, Hagen S. Stroke patients' informal caregivers: patient, caregiver, and service factors that affect caregiver strain. Stroke1999; 30: 1517-1523.
44.
44 Coulter A. Involvement of service users. The autonomous patient-ending paternalism in medical care. London: Nuffield Trust, 2002.
45.
45 Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management in the 21stcentury. London: Department of Health, 2001.
46.
46 Grant J. Home care problems experienced by stroke survivors and their family caregivers. Home Healthcare Nurse1996; 14: 892-902.
47.
47 Dowswell G, Lawler J et al. Unpacking the black box of a nurse-led stroke support service. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 160-161.
48.
48 Kerr SM, Smith LN. Stroke: an exploration of the experience of informal caregiving. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 428-436.
49.
49 Bakas T, Austin J, Okonkwo KF, Lewis RR, Chadwick L. Needs, concerns, strategies, and advice of stroke caregivers the first six months after discharge. J Neurosci Nurs2002; 34: 242-251.
