Objective: To evaluate the impact of attending an aphasia therapy centre on quality of life and communication skills in people with stroke and aphasia and their relatives.
Design: Before and after study, six months duration.
Setting: Community-based aphasia therapy centre in the United Kingdom.
Participants: Thirty-eight men and women with aphasia following a stroke, and 22 of their relatives. Mean time since stroke was 33 months (SD 24.1).
Interventions: A range of group therapies for people with aphasia and their relatives and counselling for individuals and couples.
Outcome measures: Quantitative outcome measures were ratings of quality of life and communication for people with aphasia, and relatives' independent ratings of communication and coping with caring. Qualitative outcomes were perceptions of quality of life and communication skills using semi-structured interviews.
Results: Improvement was detected on all outcomes at six months. There were significant changes from baseline on the quality of life measure, mean difference 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.02, 0.26); and the communication measure assessed by people with aphasia and their relatives, mean difference 12.8 (4.0, 21.5) and 9.7 (3.6, 15.7) respectively. The changes on the coping with caring measure were not significant, though the direction of change was positive. Qualitative interviews revealed a similar pattern of benefit in terms of increased levels of self-confidence and changes in lifestyle and levels of independence.
Conclusions: The results suggest that this therapeutic approach has an impact on quality of life and communication for people with aphasia and their relatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Hankey G. Informal care giving for disabled stroke survivors. BMJ2004; 328: 1085-1085.
2.
2 Bonita R, Solomon N, Broad J. Prevelance of stroke and stroke-related disability: estimates from the Auckland stroke studies. Stroke1997; 28: 1898-1902.
3.
3 Sudlow CLM, Warlow CP. Comparable studies of the incidence of stroke and its pathological subtypes. Results from an international collaboration. Stroke1997; 28: 491-499.
4.
4 Pedersen P, Jorgensen H, Nakayama H et al. Aphasia in acute stroke; incidence, determinants and recovery. Ann Neurol1995; 35: 659-666.
5.
5 Wade D, Hewer R, David R, Enderby P. Aphasia after stroke; natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1986; 49:11-16.
6.
6 Laska A, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med2001; 249: 413-422.
7.
7 Kauhenen M, Korpelainen J, Hiltunen P et al. Post stroke depression correlates with cognitive impairment and neurological deficits. Stroke1999; 30: 1875-1880.
8.
8 Greener J, Enderby P, Whurr R. Speech and language therapy following stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
9.
9 Cicerone K, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K et al. Evidence based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 81: 1596-1615.
10.
10 Lyon J. Coping with aphasia. San Diego: Singular Press, 1998.
11.
11 Hoen B, Thelander M, Worsley J. Improvement in psychological well being of people with aphasia and their families: evaluation of a community based program. Aphasiology1997; 11: 681-691.
12.
12 Byng S, Pound C, Parr S. Living with aphasia: a framework for therapy interventions. In: Papathanasiou I ed. Acquired neurogenic communication disorders. London: Whurr Publishers, 2000.
13.
13 Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology1998; 12: 816-830.
14.
14 EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy1990; 16: 199-208.
15.
15 Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D; a European perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2003.
16.
16 Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping DL, Smith SC. The stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity. Stroke2003; 34: 1944-1950.
17.
17 Lomas J, Rickard L, Bester S et al. The Communicative Effectiveness Index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. J Speech Hearing Disord1989; 54: 113-124.
18.
18 Nolan M, Grant G. Regular respite: an evaluation of a hospital rota bed scheme for elderly people. London: Ace Books, 1992.
19.
19 Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994.
20.
20 Van der Gaag A, Smith L, Moss B, Davis S, Mowles C. An evaluation of Connect's therapy and support services. Final Report to Dunhill Medical Trust. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 2003.
21.
21 Campbell R, Quilty B, Dieppe P. Discrepancies between patients' assessments of outcome; qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMJ2003; 326: 252-252.
22.
22 Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S, Ireland C. Talking about aphasia. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.
23.
23 Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: communication impairment. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2004.
24.
24 Boazman S. Inside aphasia. In: Corker M, French S eds. Disability discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999.
25.
25 Khosa J. Still life of a chameleon: aphasia and its impact on identity. In: Parr S, Pound C, Duchan J eds. Aphasia inside out. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003.
26.
26 Bhogal S, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia, impact on recovery. Stroke2003; 34: 978-993.
27.
27 Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston Diagnostic Examination Test. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2001.
