Objective: To determine the evidence for physical therapy interventions aimed at improving functional outcome after stroke.
Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, PEDro, EMBASE and DocOnline were searched for controlled studies. Physical therapy was divided into 10 intervention categories, which were analysed separately. If statistical pooling (weighted summary effect sizes) was not possible due to lack of comparability between interventions, patient characteristics and measures of outcome, a bestresearch synthesis was performed. This best-research synthesis was based on methodological quality (PEDro score).
Results: In total, 151 studies were included in this systematic review; 123 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 28 controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Methodological quality of all RCTs had a median of 5 points on the 10-point PEDro scale (range 2–8 points). Based on high-quality RCTs strong evidence was found in favour of task-oriented exercise training to restore balance and gait, and for strengthening the lower paretic limb. Summary effect sizes (SES) for functional outcomes ranged from 0.13 (95% CI 0.03–0.23) for effects of high intensity of exercise training to 0.92 (95% CI 0.54–1.29) for improving symmetry when moving from sitting to standing. Strong evidence was also found for therapies that were focused on functional training of the upper limb such as constraint-induced movement therapy (SES 0.46; 95% CI 0.07–0.91), treadmill training with or without body weight support, respectively 0.70 (95% CI 0.29–1.10) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.56–1.61), aerobics (SES 0.39; 95% CI 0.05–0.74), external auditory rhythms during gait (SES 0.91; 95% CI 0.40–1.42) and neuromuscular stimulation for glenohumeral subluxation (SES 1.41; 95% CI 0.76–2.06). No or insufficient evidence in terms of functional outcome was found for: traditional neurological treatment approaches; exercises for the upper limb; biofeedback; functional and neuromuscular electrical stimulation aimed at improving dexterity or gait performance; orthotics and assistive devices; and physical therapy interventions for reducing hemiplegic shoulder pain and hand oedema.
Conclusions: This review showed small to large effect sizes for task-oriented exercise training, in particular when applied intensively and early after stroke onset. In almost all high-quality RCTs, effects were mainly restricted to tasks directly trained in the exercise programme.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2002; 1: CD000197.
2.
2 Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Treatment and secondary prevention of stroke: evidence, costs, and effects on individuals and populations. Lancet1999; 354: 1457–1463.
3.
3 Langhorne P, Duncan P. Does the organization of postacute stroke care really matter?Stroke2001; 32: 268–274.
4.
4 Langhorne P, Pollock A. What are the components of effective stroke unit care?Age Ageing2002; 31: 365–371.
5.
5 Langhorne P, Legg L, Pollock A et al. Evidencebased stroke rehabilitation. Age Ageing2002; 31 (suppl 3): 17–20.
6.
6 Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003; 1: CD002925.
7.
7 Holm M. Our mandate for the new millennium: evidence based practice. Am J Occup Ther2000; 54: 575–585.
8.
8 Parker-Taillon D. CPA initiatives put the spotlight on evidence-based practice in physiotherapy. Physiother Can2002; 24: 12–15.
9.
9 WHO. ICF-introduction, the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health, 2002. Accessed 15 January 2004 from http://www.who.int/classification/icf/intros/ICF-Eng-Intro.pdf
10.
10 American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to physical therapist practice, second edition. Phys Ther2001; 81: 9–746.
11.
11 Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Moseley AM. PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther2000; 5: 223–226.
12.
12 Hedges LV. Fixed effects models. In: Cooper LV, Hedges LV eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 285–300.
13.
13 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke1997; 28: 1550–1556.
14.
14 Shadish WR, Haddock CK. Combining estimates of effect size. In: Cooper HM, Hedges LV eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 261–282.
15.
15 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials1986; 7: 177–188.
16.
16 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, second edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988.
17.
17 van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B et al. The effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine1999; 24: 1113–1123.
18.
18 Ada L, Foongchomcheay A. Efficacy of electrical stimulation in preventing or reducing subluxation of the shoulder after stroke: a meta-analysis. Aust J Physiother2002; 48: 257–267.
19.
19 de Kroon JR, van der Lee JH, IJzerman MJ et al. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 350–360.
20.
20 Geurts AC, Visschers BA, van Limbeek J et al. Systematic review of aetiology and treatment of post-stroke hand oedema and shoulder-hand syndrome. Scand J Rehabil Med2000; 32: 4–10.
21.
21 Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W et al. Biofeedback therapy in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 508–515.
22.
22 Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W et al. Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 549–553.
23.
23 Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better?Physiother Res Int1996; 1: 75–78.
24.
24 Lannin NA, Herbert RD. Is hand splinting effective for adults following stroke? A systematic review and methodological critique of published research. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 807–816.
25.
25 Leung J, Moseley A. Impact of ankle-footorthoses on gait and leg muscle activity in adults with hemiplegia–systematic literature review. Physiotherapy2003; 89: 39–55.
26.
26 Manning CD, Pomeroy VM. Effectiveness of treadmill retraining on gait of hemiparetic stroke patients; systematic review of current literature. Physiotherapy2003; 89: 337–349.
27.
27 Meek C, Pollock A, Potter J et al. A systematic review of exercise trials post stroke. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 6–13.
28.
28 Moreland J, Thomson MA. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis. Phys Ther1994; 74: 534–543.
29.
29 Moreland JD, Thomson MA, Fuoco AR. Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 134–140.
30.
30 Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003; 3: CD002840.
31.
31 Paci M. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. J Rehabil Med2003; 35: 2–7.
32.
32 Pollock A, Baer G, Pomeroy V et al. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003; 2: CD001920.
33.
33 Pomeroy VM, Tallis RC. Physical therapy to improve movement performance and functional ability poststroke. Part 1. Existing evidence. Rev Clin Gerontol2000; 10: 261–290.
34.
34 Price CI, Pandyan AD. Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 5–19.
35.
35 Schleenbaker RE, Mainous AG, III. Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patient: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 1301–1304.
36.
36 Snels IA, Dekker JH, van der Lee JH et al. Treating patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2002; 81: 150–160.
37.
37 Steultjens EM, Dekker J, Bouter LM et al. Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review. Stroke2003; 34: 676–687.
38.
38 van der Lee JH, Snels IA, Beckerman H et al. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 20–31.
39.
39 Barbeau H. Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2003; 17: 3–11.
40.
40 Burridge JH, Swain ID, Taylor PN. Functional electrical stimulation: a review of the literature published on common peroneal nerve stimulation for the correction of dropped foot. Rev Clin Gerontol1998; 8: 155–161.
41.
41 Carr EK, Kenney FD. Positioning of the stroke patient: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud1992; 29: 355–369.
42.
42 Chae J, Yu B. Neuromuscular stimulation for motor relearning in hemiplegia. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med1999; 11: 279–297.
43.
43 Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80 (5 suppl 1): S35–S39.
44.
44 De Weerdt W, Harrison MA. The efficacy of electromyographic feedback for stroke patients: a critical review of the main literature. Physiotherapy1986; 72: 108–118.
45.
45 Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke1986; 17: 363–369.
46.
46 Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil1997; 3: 1–20.
47.
47 Ernst E. A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke1990; 21: 1081–1085.
48.
48 Gowland CA, Basmajian JV. In: Basmajian JV, Banerjee SN eds. Clinical decision making in rehabilitation. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996: 5–17.
49.
49 Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar R. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of literature. Physiotherapy1999; 85: 377–391.
50.
50 Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol1993; 50: 37–44.
52 Turner-Stokes L, Jackson D. Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 276–298.
53.
53 van der Lee JH. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different?Curr Opin Neurol2001; 14: 741–744.
57 Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S et al. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2003; 17: 220–226.
58.
58 Ince LP, Leon MS, Christidis D. EMG biofeedback with upper extremity musculature for relaxation training: a critical review of the literature. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry1985; 16: 133–137.
59.
59 Beckerman H, Becher J, Lankhorst GJ et al. Walking ability of stroke patients: efficacy of tibial nerve blocking and a polypropylene ankle-foot orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 1144–1151.
60.
60 Beckerman H, Becher J, Lankhorst GJ et al. The efficacy of thermocoagulation of the tibial nerve and a polypropylene ankle-foot-orthosis on spasticity of the leg in stroke patients: results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil1996; 10: 112–120.
61.
61 Engardt M, Ribbe T, Olsson E. Vertical ground reaction force feedback to enhance stroke patients' symmetrical body-weight distribution while rising/ sitting down. Scand J Rehabil Med1993; 25: 41–48.
62.
62 Engardt M. Long-term effects of auditory feedback training on relearned symmetrical body weight distribution in stroke patients. A follow-up study. Scand J Rehabil Med1994; 26: 65–69.
63.
63 Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM et al. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 73–79.
64.
64 Faghri PD, Rodgers MM. The effects of functional neuromuscular stimulation-augmented physical therapy program in the functional recovery of hemiplegic arm in stroke patients. Clin Kinesiol J Am Kinesiother Assoc1997; 51: 9–15.
65.
65 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet1999; 354: 191–196.
66.
66 Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2002; 72: 473–479.
67.
67 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 361–369.
68.
68 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A follow-up one and four years post stroke. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 731–734.
69.
69 Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke1999; 30: 573–579.
70.
70 Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 187–198.
71.
71 Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE et al. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med1998; 30: 95–99.
72.
72 Sonde L, Kalimo H, Fernaeus SE et al.Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 14–19.
73.
73 Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL et al. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1992; 55: 530–535.
74.
74 Sunderland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L et al. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1994; 57: 856–858.
75.
75 Wang RY, Chan RC, Tsai MW. Functional electrical stimulation on chronic and acute hemiplegic shoulder subluxation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2000; 79: 385–390.
76.
76 Wang RY, Yang YR, Tsai MW et al. Effects of functional electric stimulation on upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion in hemiplegic patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2002; 81: 283–290.
77.
77 Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N et al. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke1998; 29: 1122–1128.
78.
78 Barbeau H, Visintin M. Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 1458–1465.
79.
79 Malouin F, Potvin M, Prevost J et al. Use of an intensive task-oriented gait training program in a series of patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents. Phys Ther1992; 72: 781–789.
80.
80 Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S et al. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 612–620.
81.
81 Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson MA et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programmes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 267–272.
82.
82 Jongbloed L, Stacey S, Brighton C. Stroke rehabilitation: sensorimotor integrative treatment versus functional treatment. Am J Occup Ther1989; 43: 391–397.
83.
83 Logigian MK, Samuels MA, Falconer J et al. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 364–367.
84.
84 Poole JL, Whitney SL, Hangeland N et al. The effectiveness of inflatable pressure splints on motor function in stroke patients. Occup Ther J Res1990; 10: 360–366.
85.
85 Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM et al. Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1970; 51: 526–531.
86.
86 Mudie MH, Winzeler-Mercay U, Radwan S et al. Training symmetry of weight distribution after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing task-related reach, Bobath and feedback training approaches. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 582–592.
87.
87 Gelber DA, Josefczyk PB, Herrman D et al. Comparison of two therapy approaches in the rehabilitation of the pure motor hemiparetic stroke patients. J Neuro Rehab1995; 9: 191–196.
88.
88 Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T et al. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther1986; 66: 1233–1238.
89.
89 Lord JP, Hall K. Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programmes for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1986; 67: 88–91.
90.
90 Patel M, Potter J, Perez I et al. The process of rehabilitation and discharge planning in stroke: a controlled comparison between stroke units. Stroke1998; 29: 2484–2487.
91.
91 Glasser L. Effects of isokinetic training on the rate of movement during ambulation in hemiparetic patients. Phys Ther1986; 66: 673–676.
92.
92 Bourbonnais D, Bilodeau S, Lepage Y et al. Effect of force-feedback treatments in patients with chronic motor deficits after a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2002; 81: 890–897.
93.
93 Inaba M, Edberg E, Montgomery J et al. Effectiveness of functional training, active exercise, and resistive exercise for patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther1973; 53: 28–35.
94.
94 Kim CM, Eng JJ, MacIntyre DL et al. Effects of isokinetic strength training on walking in persons with stroke: a double-blind controlled pilot study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2001; 10: 265–273.
95.
95 Lindsley HG, Musser L, Steward MR et al. The effects of Kinetron training on gait patterns with strokes. Neurol Rep1994; 19: 29–34 (abstract).
96.
96 Moreland JD, Goldsmith CH, Huijbregts MP et al. Progressive resistance strengthening exercises after stroke: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 1433–1440.
97.
97 Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P et al. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci1995; 130: 59–68.
98.
98 Engardt M, Knutsson E, Jonsson M et al. Dynamic muscle strength training in stroke patients: effects on knee extension torque, electromyographic activity, and motor function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 419–425.
99.
99 Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1993; 56: 241–244.
100.
100 Dean CM, Mackey FH, Katrak P. Examination of shoulder positioning after stroke: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Aust J Physiother2000; 46: 35–40.
101.
101 Carey JR. Manual stretch: effect on finger movement control and force control in stroke subjects with spastic extrinsic finger flexor muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 888–894.
102.
102 Langlois S, Pederson L, MacKinnon JR. The effects of splinting on the spastic hemiplegic hand: report of a feasible study. Can J Occup Ther1991; 58: 17–25.
103.
103 Rose V, Shah S. A comparative study on the immediate effects of hand orthosis on reduction of hypertonus. Aust Occup Ther J1980; 34: 59–64.
104.
104 Leandri M, Parodi CI, Corrieri N et al. Comparison of TENS treatments in hemiplegic shoulder pain. Scand J Rehabil Med1990; 22: 69–71.
105.
105 Tekeoglu Y, Adak B, Goksoy T. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index score following stroke. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 277–280.
106.
106 Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol2002; 51: 122–125.
107.
107 McPherson JJ, Becker AH, Franszczak N. Dynamic splint to reduce the passive component of hypertonicity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66: 249–252.
108.
108 Dickstein R, Pillar T. Evaluating the effects of reflex-inhibiting patterns among hemiplegic patients using EMG biofeedback. Physiother Can1983; 35: 141–143.
109.
109 Potempa K, Braun LT, Tinknell T et al. Benefits of aerobic exercise after stroke. Sports Med1996; 21: 337–346.
110.
110 Duncan P, Richards L, Wallace D et al.A randomized, controlled pilot study of a homebased exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke1998; 29: 2055–2060.
111.
111 Katz-Leurer M, Shochina M, Carmeli E et al. The influence of early aerobic training on the functional capacity in patients with cerebrovascular accident at the subacute stage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 1609–1614.
112.
112 Kelly JO, Davis GM, Kilbreath SL et al. Exercise training improves walking endurance in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Research Conference-From Cell to Society 2002 (abstract).
113.
113 Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 409–417.
114.
114 Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke2003; 34: 2173–2180.
115.
115 Rimmer JH, Riley B, Creviston T et al. Exercise training in a predominantly African-American group of stroke survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc2000; 32: 1990–1996.
116.
116 Teixeira-Salmela LF, Olney SJ, Nadeau S et al. Muscle strengthening and physical conditioning to reduce impairment and disability in chronic stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 121–118.
117.
117 Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke1997; 28: 722–728.
118.
118 de Seze M, Wiart L, Bon-Saint-Come A et al. Rehabilitation of postural disturbances of hemiplegic patients by using trunk control retraining during exploratory exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 793–800.
119.
119 Pollock AS, Durward BR, Rowe PJ et al. The effect of independent practice of motor tasks by stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 473–480.
120.
120 Cheng PT, Wu SH, Liaw MY et al. Symmetrical body-weight distribution training in stroke patients and its effect on fall prevention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1650–1654.
121.
121 Shumway-Cook A, Anson D, Haller S. Postural sway biofeedback: its effect on reestablishing stance stability in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69: 395–400.
122.
122 Wong AM, Lee MY, Kuo JK et al. The development and clinical evaluation of a standing biofeedback trainer. J Rehabil Res Dev1997; 34: 322–327.
123.
123 Sackley CM, Lincoln NB. Single blind randomized controlled trial of visual feedback after stroke: effects on stance symmetry and function. Disabil Rehabil1997; 19: 536–546.
124.
124 Grant T, Brouwer BJ, Culham EG et al. Balance retraining following acute stroke: a comparison of two methods. Can J Rehabil1997; 11: 69–73.
125.
125 Lin JJ, Chung KC. Evaluate a biofeedback training on the dynamic and static balance for preambulation in hemiplegic patients. Chin J Med Biolo Eng1998; 18: 59–65.
126.
126 Walker C, Brouwer BJ, Culham EG. Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Phys Ther2000; 80: 886–895.
127.
127 Geiger RA, Allen JB, O'Keefe J et al. Balance and mobility following stroke: effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/forceplate training. Phys Ther2001; 81: 995–1005.
128.
128 Winstein CJ, Gardner ER, McNeal DR et al. Standing balance training: effect on balance and locomotion in hemiparetic adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1989; 70: 755–762.
129.
129 Morioka S, Yagi F. Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 600–607.
130.
130 Kosak MC, Reding MJ. Comparison of partial body weight-supported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing assisted walking post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2000; 14: 13–19.
131.
131 Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Danielsson A et al. Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 515–527.
132.
132 Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH. Step training with body weight support: Effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 683–691.
133.
133 da Cunha IT Jr, Lim PA, Qureshy H et al. Gait outcomes after acute stroke rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 1258–1265.
134.
134 Trueblood PR. Partial body weight treadmill training in persons with chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation2001; 16: 141–153.
135.
135 Scheidtmann K, Brunner H, Muller F et al. ‘Sequenzeffekte in der laufbandtherapie’. Neurol Rehabil1999; 5: 198–202.
136.
136 Laufer Y, Dickstein R, Chefez Y et al. The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: a randomized study. J Rehabil Res Dev2001; 38: 69–78.
137.
137 Liston R, Mickelborough J, Harris B et al. Conventional physiotherapy and treadmill retraining for higher-level gait disorders in cerebrovascular disease. Age Ageing2000; 29: 311–318.
138.
138 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C et al. Speeddependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke2002; 33: 553–558.
139.
139 Ada L, Dean CM, Hall JM et al. A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 1486–1491.
140.
140 Mandel AR, Nymark JR, Balmer SJ et al. Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 649–654.
141.
141 Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Sci1997; 151: 207–212.
142.
142 Schauer M, Mauritz KH. Musical motor feedback (MMF) in walking hemiparetic stroke patients: randomized trials of gait improvement. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 713–722.
143.
143 Pomeroy VM, Evans B, Falconer M et al.An exploration of the effects of weighted garments on balance and gait of stroke patients with residual disability. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 390–397.
144.
144 Barrett JA, Watkins C, Plant R et al. The COSTAR wheelchair study: a two-centre pilot study of self-propulsion in a wheelchair in early stroke rehabilitation. Collaborative Stroke Audit and Research. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 32–41.
145.
145 Kirby RL, Ethans KD, Duggan RE et al. Wheelchair propulsion: descriptive comparison of hemiplegic and two-hand patterns during selected activities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1999; 78: 131–135.
146.
146 Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet1999; 353: 2035–2036.
147.
147 Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke1998; 29: 785–792.
148.
148 Werner RA, Kessler S. Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1996; 75: 114–120.
149.
149 Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C et al. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome?Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 579–589.
150.
150 Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?Stroke2000; 31: 2984–2988.
151.
151 Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P et al. Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev2001; 38: 583–590.
152.
152 Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV et al. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2002; 16: 290–295.
153.
153 Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I et al. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 1374–1377.
154.
154 Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 347–354.
155.
155 van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke1999; 30: 2369–2375.
156.
156 Luft AR, McCombe Waller S, Whitall J et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training in long-term stroke survivors induces cortical reorganisation. Stroke2002; 33: 416–417 (abstract).
157.
157 Rothgangel A, Morton A. ‘Phantoms in the brain’-spiegeltherapie en virtual reality bij CVA-patienten, een pilot-studie in de vorm van een single blind randomized trial; Hogeschool Zuyd, Heerlen. 2002 (unpublished).
158.
158 Basmajian JV, Kukulka CG, Narayan MG et al. Biofeedback treatment of foot-drop after stroke compared with standard rehabilitation technique: effects on voluntary control and strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1975; 56: 231–236.
159.
159 Binder SA, Moll CB, Wolf SL. Evaluation of electromyographic biofeedback as an adjunct to therapeutic exercise in treating the lower extremities of hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther1981; 61: 886–893.
160.
160 Bradley L, Hart BB, Mandana S et al. Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 11–22.
161.
161 Colborne GR, Olney SJ, Griffin MP. Feedback of ankle joint angle and soleus electromyography in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 1100–1106.
162.
162 Cozean CD, Pease WS, Hubbell SL. Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69: 401–405.
163.
163 Hurd WW, Pegram V, Nepomuceno C. Comparison of actual and simulated EMG biofeedback in the treatment of hemiplegic patients. Am J Phys Med1980; 59: 73–82.
164.
164 Intiso D, Santilli V, Grasso MG et al. Rehabilitation of walking with electromyographic biofeedback in foot-drop after stroke. Stroke1994; 25: 1189–1192.
165.
165 John J. Failure of electrical myofeedback to augment the effects of physiotherapy in stroke. Int J Rehabil Res1986; 9: 35–45.
166.
166 Mulder T, Hulstijn W, van der Meer J. EMG feedback and the restoration of motor control. A controlled group study of 12 hemiparetic patients. Am J Phys Med1986; 65: 173–188.
167.
167 Winchester P, Montgomery J, Bowman B et al. Effects of feedback stimulation training and cyclical electrical stimulation on knee extension in hemiparetic patients. Phys Ther1983; 63: 1096–1103.
168.
168 Morris ME, Matyas TA, Bach TM et al. Electrogoniometric feedback: its effect on genu recurvatum in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 1147–1154.
169.
169 Burnside IG, Tobias HS, Bursill D. Electromyographic feedback in the remobilization of stroke patients: a controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1982; 63: 217–222.
170.
170 Dursun E, Hamamci N, Donmez S et al. Angular biofeedback device for sitting balance of stroke patients. Stroke1996; 27: 1354–1357.
171.
171 Montoya R, Dupui P, Pages B et al. Step-length biofeedback device for walk rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput1994; 32: 416–420.
172.
172 Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther1983; 63: 1404–1413.
173.
173 Basmajian JV, Gowland C, Brandstater ME et al. EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1982; 63: 613–616.
174.
174 Bate PJ, Matyas TA. Negative transfer of training following brief practice of elbow tracking movements with electromyographic feedback from spastic antagonists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 1050–1058.
175.
175 Crow JL, Lincoln NB, Nouri FM et al. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Stud1989; 11: 155–160.
176.
176 Greenberg S, Fowler RS, Jr. Kinesthetic biofeedback: a treatment modality for elbow range of motion in hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther1980; 34: 738–743.
177.
177 Inglis J, Donald MW, Monga TN et al. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1984; 65: 755–759.
178.
178 Smith KN. Biofeedback in strokes. Aust J Physiother1979; 25: 155–161.
179.
179 Williams JM. Use of electromyographic biofeedback for pain reduction in the spastic hemiplegic shoulder: a pilot study. Physiother Can1982; 34: 327–333.
180.
180 Lee KH, Hill E, Johnston R et al. Myofeedback for muscle retraining in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1976; 57: 588–591.
181.
181 Prevo AJ, Visser SL, Vogelaar TW. Effect of EMG feedback on paretic muscles and abnormal cocontraction in the hemiplegic arm, compared with conventional physical therapy. Scand J Rehabil Med1982; 14: 121–131.
182.
182 Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther1983; 63: 1393–1403.
183.
183 Skelly AM, Kenedi RM. EMG biofeedback therapy in the re-education of the hemiplegic shoulder in patients with sensory loss. Physiotherapy1982; 68: 34–38.
184.
184 Bogataj U, Gros N, Kljajic M et al. The rehabilitation of gait in patients with hemiplegia: a comparison between conventional therapy and multichannel functional electrical stimulation therapy. Phys Ther1995; 75: 490–502.
185.
185 Burridge JH, Taylor PN, Hagan SA et al. The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients. Clin Rehabil1997; 11: 201–210.
186.
186 Macdonell RAL, Triggs WJ, Leikauskas J et al. Functional electrical stimulation to the affected lower limb and recovery after cerebral infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis1994; 4: 155–160.
187.
187 Merletti R, Zelaschi F, Latella D et al. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med1978; 10: 147–154.
188.
188 Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1979; 60: 497–502.
189.
189 Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T et al. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke1998; 29: 975–979.
190.
190 Packman-Braun R. Relationship between functional electrical stimulation duty cycle and fatigue in wrist extensor muscles of patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther1988; 68: 51–56.
191.
191 Powell J, Pandyan AD, Granat M et al. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke1999; 30: 1384–1389.
192.
192 Cauraugh J, Light K, Kim S et al. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke2000; 31: 1360–1364.
193.
193 Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 570–575.
194.
194 Hemmen B, Seelen H, Moennekens M et al. Effect van EMG-triggered feedback op arm-handfunctie bij CVA-patienten. Revalidatie na een beroerte Congres Zwolle-2002, 2002 (abstract).
195.
195 Cauraugh JH, Kim SB. Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2003; 74: 1562–1566.
196.
196 Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 220–227.
197.
197 Baker LL, Parker K. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the muscles surrounding the shoulder. Phys Ther1986; 66: 1930–1937.
198.
198 Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR. Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke1999; 30: 963–968.
199.
199 Chantraine A, Baribeault A, Uebelhart D et al. Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 328–331.
200.
200 Kobayashi H, Onishi H, Ihashi K et al. Reduction in subluxation and improved muscle function of the hemiplegic shoulder joint after therapeutic electrical stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol1999; 9: 327–336.
201.
201 Hurd MM, Farrell KH, Waylonis GW. Shoulder sling for hemiplegia: friend or foe?Arch Phys Med Rehabil1974; 55: 519–522.
202.
202 Hanger HC, Whitewood P, Brown G et al.A randomized controlled trial of strapping to prevent post-stroke shoulder pain. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 370–380.
203.
203 Ancliffe J. Strapping the shoulder in patients following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA): a pilot study. Aust J Physiother1992; 38: 37–41.
204.
204 Inaba MK, Piorkowski M. Ultrasound in treatment of painful shoulders in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther1972; 52: 737–742.
205.
205 Partridge CJ, Edwards SM, Mee R et al. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: a study of two methods of physiotherapy treatment. Clin Rehabil1990; 4: 43–49.
206.
206 Kumar R, Metter EJ, Mehta AJ et al. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia. The role of exercise. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1990; 69: 205–208.
207.
207 Poduri KR. Shoulder pain in stroke patients and its effects on rehabilitation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis1993; 3: 261–266.
208.
208 Roper TA, Redford S, Tallis RC. Intermittent compression for the treatment of the oedematous hand in hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing1999; 28: 9–13.
209.
209 Smith DS, Goldenberg E, Ashburn A et al. Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J (Clin Res ED)1981; 282: 517–520.
210.
210 Wade DT, Collen FM, Robb GF et al. Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. BMJ1992; 304: 609–613.
211.
211 Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP et al. The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke –a controlled trial. Stroke1985; 16: 928–931.
212.
212 Logan PA, Ahern J, Gladman JR et al.A randomized controlled trial of enhanced Social Service occupational therapy for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil1997; 11: 107–113.
213.
213 Walker MF, Gladman JR, Lincoln NB et al. Occupational therapy for stroke patients not admitted to hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet1999; 354: 278–280.
214.
214 Partridge C, Mackenzie M, Edwards S et al.Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from stroke: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int2000; 5: 230–240.
215.
215 Green J, Forster A, Bogle S et al. Physiotherapy for patients with mobility problems more than 1 year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2002; 359: 199–203.
216.
216 Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Drummond AE et al.A multicentre randomized controlled trial of leisure therapy and conventional occupational therapy after stroke. TOTAL Study Group. Trial of Occupational Therapy and Leisure. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 42–52.
217.
217 Slade A, Tennant A, Chamberlain MA. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy upon length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med2002; 34: 260–266.
218.
218 The Glasgow Augmented Physiotherapy Study Group. Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2004; 18: 529–537.
219.
219 Gilbertson L, Langhorne P, Walker A et al. Domiciliary occupational therapy for patients with stroke discharged from hospital: randomised controlled trial. BMJ2000; 320: 603–606.
220.
220 Fang Y, Chen X, Li H et al. A study on additional early physiotherapy after stroke and factors affecting functional recovery. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 608–617.
221.
221 Keith RA, Wilson DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 495–500.
222.
222 Rapoport J, Judd-Van Eerd M. Impact of physical therapy weekend coverage on length of stay in an acute care community hospital. Phys Ther1989; 69: 32–37.
223.
223 Ruff RM, Yarnell S, Marinos JM. Are stroke patients discharged sooner if in-patient rehabilitation services are provided seven v six days per week?Am J Phys Med Rehabil1999; 78: 143–146.
224.
224 Kwakkel G, Van Peppen RPS, Wagenaar RC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke2004 (in press).
225.
225 van der Lee JH, Kwakkel G, Lankhorst GJ et al. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. J Neurol2002249: 518–528. J Neurol 2003; 250: 119.
226.
226 Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J et al. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1204–1212.
227.
227 Lennon S. The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther Review1996; 1: 35–45.
228.
228 Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PC et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med1990; 22: 1–8.
229.
229 Latash ML, Anson JG. What are'normal movements' in atypical populations?Behav and Brain Science1996; 19: 55–106.
230.
230 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC. Effect of duration of upper-and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. Phys Ther2002; 82: 432–448.
