Objective: To contribute to the reliability and validity of a series of functional balance tests for use post stroke.
Design: Within-session, test-retest and intertester reliability was tested using the kappa coefficient and intraclass correlations. The tests were performed three times and the first and third attempts compared to test the within-session reliability. The tests were repeated a few days later to assess test-retest reliability and were scored simultaneously by two physiotherapists to assess the intertester reliability. To test criterion-related validity the tests were compared with the sitting section of the Motor Assessment Scale, Berg Balance Scale and Rivermead Mobility Index using Spearman's rho.
Setting: Stroke physiotherapy services of six National Health Service hospitals.
Participants: People with a post stroke hemiplegia attending physiotherapy who had no other pathology affecting their balance took part. Thirty-five people participated in the reliability testing and 48 people took part in the validity testing.
Main outcome measures: The following functional balance tests were used: supported sitting balance, sitting arm raise, sitting forward reach, supported standing balance, standing arm raise, standing forward reach, static tandem standing, weight shift, timed 5-m walk with and without an aid, tap and step-up tests.
Results: The ordinal level tests (supported sitting and standing balance and static tandem standing tests) showed 100% agreement in all aspects of reliability. Intraclass correlations for the other tests ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. All the tests showed significant correlations with the appropriate comparator tests (r=0.32-0.74 p≤0.05), except the weight shift test and step-up tests which did not form significant relationship with Berg Balance Scale (r=0.26 and 0.19 respectively).
Conclusion: These functional balance tests are reliable and valid measures of balance disability post stroke.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Partridge C ed. Evaluation of physiotherapy for people with stroke. London: Kings Fund, 1994.
2.
2 Ashburn A. A review of current physiotherapy in the management of stroke. In: Harrison MA ed. Physiotherapy in stroke management. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1995.
3.
3 Tyson S, DeSouza L. Measurement of balance and walking post-stroke: Part 1 Ordinal scales. Phys Ther Rev2002; 7: 177-185.
4.
4 Tyson S, DeSouza L. Measurement of balance and walking post-stroke: Part 2 Functional performance tests. Phys Ther Rev2002; 7: 87-91.
5.
5 Tyson S, DeSouza L. Measurement of balance post-stroke: Part 3 Instrumented measurement tools. Phys Ther Rev2002; 7: 231-241.
6.
6 Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
7.
7 Fishman MN, Colby LA, Sachs LA, Nichols DS. Comparison of upper extremity balance tests and force platform testing in persons with hemiparesis. Phys Ther1997; 77: 1052-1062.
8.
8 Hill KD, Bernhardt J, McGann AM, Maltese D, Berkovits D. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients; reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Phys Can1996; 48: 4257-4262.
9.
9 Tyson S, DeSouza L. A clinical model for the assessment of posture and balance post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil2003; 25: 120-127.
10.
10 Tyson S, DeSouza L. Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment; a new measure of balance disability post-stroke. Clin Rehabil2004; 18: 801-810.
11.
11 Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm R, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther1985; 65: 175-179.
12.
12 Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health1992; 83(suppl 2): S7-S11.
13.
13 Collen F, Wade D, Robb G, Bradshaw C. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud1991; 13:50-54.
14.
14 Collen F, Wade DT, Bradshaw C. Mobility after stroke; reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud1990; 12: 6-9.
15.
15 Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J et al. Functional Reach; a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol1990; 45: M192-M197.
16.
16 Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Spencer KI, McGinley RB. Postural control in standing following stroke; test-retest reliability of some quantitative clinical tests. Phys Ther1990; 70: 234-243.
17.
17 Weiner DK, Duncan PM, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional Reach: a marker of physical frailty. JAm Geriatr Soc1992; 40: 203-207.
18.
18 Giorgetti M, Harris B, Jette A. Reliability of clinical balance outcome measures in the elderly. Physiother Res Int1998; 3: 274-283.
19.
19 Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther1984; 64: 35-40.
20.
20 Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurological impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 9-13.
21.
21 Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, second edition. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1995.
22.
22 Sackley S, Gladman J. The evidence for rehabilitation after severely disabling stroke. Phys Ther Rev1998; 3: 19-29.
