Objectives: This paper compares the situation of the person with acquired brain injury to that of the people of Israel in the sixth century BCE (before the current era) during the period of exile in Babylon. Both situations are characterized by traumatic multiple losses, and a struggle to regain a sense of identity: personal, national or spiritual. Evidence from the literature on both brain injury rehabilitation and from the Hebrew Scriptures indicates that models of restoration of function and transformation of suffering have been applied to both situations. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these models are considered, and it is argued that models of transformation of suffering have much to offer, especially in the longer term psychotherapeutic rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury, when restoration of function has reached its limits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Smith D. The religion of the landless. New York: Meyer-Stone, 1989.
2.
2 Direnfeld G. Traumatic brain injury: getting to the underbelly and getting through it. Cognit Rehabil1991; 9: 20-23.
3.
3 Mohl P, Burstein A. The application of Kohutian self-psychology to consultation-liaison psychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiatry1982; 4: 113-119.
4.
4 KayT. Minor head injury: an introduction for professionals. Framingham, Massachusetts: National Head Injury Foundation, 1986.
5.
5 Persinger M. Personality changes following brain injury as a grief response to the loss of sense of self. Psychol Rep1993; 72: 1059-1068.
6.
6 Nadell J. Towards an existential psychotherapy with the traumatically brain injured patient. Cognit Rehabil1991; 9: 8-13.
7.
7 Prigatano G. Work, love, and play after brain injury. Bull Menninger Clin1989; 53: 414-431.
8.
8 Prigatano G. Disordered mind, wounded soul: the emerging role of psychotherapy in rehabilitation after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil1991; 6: 1-10.
9.
9 McGrath J. Fear following brain injury. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Oxford Brookes University, 1998.
10.
10 Prigatano G. Psychotherapy after brain injury. In: Prigatano G ed. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986: 216-220.
11.
11 Whitehouse A. Applications of cognitive therapy with survivors of brain injury. J Cognit Psychother1994; 8: 141-160.
12.
12 Cicerone K, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K et al. Evidencebased cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 1596-1615.
13.
13 Prigatano G. Individuality, lesion location, and psychotherapy after brain injury. In: Christensen A-L, Uzzell B eds. Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation: international perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.
15 Stillwell J, Hawley C, Stillwell P et al. National Traumatic Brain Injury Study. Coventry: Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Warwick, 1997.
16.
16 Gans J. Hate in the rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 176-179.
17.
17 Davis C, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Larson J. Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning. J Personal Soc Psychol1998: 75: 561-574.
18.
18 Adams N. Positive outcomes in families following traumatic brain injury. Aust N Z J Fam Ther1996; 17:75-84.
19.
19 Frank R, Elliott T, Corcoran J et al. Depression after spinal cord injury: Is it necessary?Clin Psychol Rev1987; 7: 611-630.
20.
20 Linley PA, Joseph S. Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. J Traum Stress2004; 17: 11-21.
21.
21 Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
22.
22 Frankl V. Man's search for meaning. Boston: Beacon, 1963.
23.
23 Jung C, Pauli W. The interpretation of nature and the psyche. New York: Pantheon, 1955.
