Objective: To evaluate by means of a controlled clinical trial the effectiveness and the tolerance of prismatic correction in improving visual function in patients affected by advanced bilateral age-related macular degeneration.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Clinic, University of Trieste.
Subjects and interventions: Each patient underwent an ophthalmologic examination, complete with distance visual acuity measurement using the Standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Patients were then randomly assigned to the treatment or control group. The treatment group received spectacles lenses with a prismatic correction of low power (5–7 prismatic dioptres) in the better eye.
Main measures: Visual acuity was measured at baseline and 1, 90, 180 and 360 days after prescription in both groups.
Results: The treatment group consisted of 14 patients, while the control group was of 14 patients. The prismatic correction was well tolerated in 85.7% of cases. Visual acuity in the treatment group improved mostly at three-month follow-up, with a slight further improvement at the sixand 12-month follow-ups, showing a statistically significant difference in comparison with the control group. No visual acuity improvement was registered in the control group.
Conclusion: Monolateral prismatic correction may be considered a viable means to improve visual function in patients affected by bilateral age-related macular degeneration at an advanced stage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Evans JR. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res2001; 20: 227–253.
2.
2 Klein R, Klein BEK, Linton KLP. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology1992; 99: 933–943.
3.
3 Sarks JP, Sarks SH, Killingsworth MC. Evolution of geographic atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Eye1988; 2: 552–577.
4.
4 Vingerling JR, Dielemns I, Hofman A et al. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology1995; 102: 205–210.
5.
5 Cummings RW, Whittaker SG, Watson GR et al. Scanning characters and reading with central scotoma. Am J Optom Physiol Optics1985; 62: 833–843.
6.
6 Schuchard RA. Adaptation to macular scotomas in persons with low vision. Am J Occup Ther1995; 49: 870–876.
7.
7 Verezen CA, Volker-Dieben HJ, Hoyng CB. Eccentric viewing spectacles in everyday life, for the optimum use of residual functional retinal areas, in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci1996; 73: 413–417.
8.
8 Whittaker SG, Budd J, Cummings RW. Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1988; 29: 268–278.
9.
9 Frennesson C, Jakobsson P, Nilsson UL. A computer and video display based system for training eccentric viewing in macular degeneration with an absolute central scotoma. Doc Ophthalmol1995; 91:9–16.
10.
10 Margrain TH. Helping blind and partially sighted people to read: the effectiveness of low vision aids. Br J Ophthalmol2000; 84: 919–921.
11.
11 Peli E, Goldstein RB, Young GM, Trempe CL, Buzney SM. Image enhancement for the visually impaired. Simulations and experimental results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1991; 32: 2337–2350.
12.
12 Rinnert T, Lindner H, Behrens-Baumann W. [At home utilization of low-vision aids by the visually impaired]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd1999; 215: 305–310.
13.
13 Romayananda N, Wong SW, Elzeneiny IH, Chan GH. Prismatic scanning method for improving visual acuity in patients with low vision. Ophthalmology1982; 89: 937–945.
14.
14 Bertrand T, Junginger H, Romanet JP, Mouillon M. [Description of the prismation method in the rehabilitation of low visions of macular origin]. JFr Ophtalmol1997; 20: 271–276.
15.
15 Rosenberg R, Faye E, Fischer M, Budick D. Role of prism relocation in improving visual performance of patients with macular dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci1989; 66: 747–750.
16.
16 Goodrich GL, Mehr EB. Eccentric viewing training and low vision aids: current practice and implications of peripheral retinal research. Am J Optom Physiol Opt1986; 63: 119–126.
17.
17 Long WF, Woo GC. A prismatic scanning method for treating low vision patients with macular disorders. Ophthalmology1984; 9: 45A-45A.
18.
18 Gok H, Kucukdeveci A, Altinkaynak H, Yavuzer G, Ergin S. Effects of ankle–foot orthoses on hemiparetic gait. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 137–139.
19.
19 Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a lowvision population. Ophthalmology1997; 104: 632–638.
20.
20 Lei H, Schuchard RA. Using two preferred retinal loci for different lighting conditions in patients with central scotomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1997; 38: 1812–1818.
21.
21 Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA, Watson G. Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. J Rehabil Res Dev1999; 36: 356–364.
22.
22 Sunness JS, Applegate CA, Haselwood D, Rubin GS. Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic agerelated macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. Ophthalmology1996; 103: 1458–1466.
23.
23 Guez JE, Le Gargasson JF, Rigaudiere F, O'Regan JK. Is there a systematic location for the pseudofovea in patients with central scotoma?Vision Res1993; 33: 1271–1279.
