Objectives: To test the effects of a home-based educational intervention in reducing the incidence and the risk of falls and pressure sores in adults with progressive neurological conditions.
Design: Randomized controlled trial with 12 months follow-up.
Setting: Participants’ homes in the City of Nottingham.
Participants: One hundred and fourteen people with progressive neurological conditions recruited from general practices in Nottingham, including 53 with Parkinson's disease and 45 with multiple sclerosis.
Interventions: In the education group (EG), baseline data were reviewed by an expert panel which advised on actions most likely to promote each individual's physical, social and psychological well-being. An occupational therapist (OT) then visited EG participants to provide education and information and to discuss a personalized 12-month health action plan. The comparison group (CoG) received standardized printed information delivered to their home.
Main measures: Numbers of participants reporting falls and skin sores at two-monthly phone calls during the follow-up period of 12 months.
Results: The EG reported significantly more falls during the follow-up period and at 12 months (adjusted odds ratio 2.83 (95% CI 1.07-7.47), p=0.036) and significantly more skin sores (adjusted odds ratio 12.74 (95% CI 1.14-142.6), p=0.039) than the CoG. There was no difference between CoG and EG in the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living score, but EG patients showed a significant rise in this score over the study period of 1.62 (95% CI 0.69-2.55, p=0.002).
Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that education for people with progressive neurological conditions can have negative effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Downton J. Falls in the elderly. London: Edward Arnold, 1993.
2.
2 Studenski S, Duncan PW, Chandler J et al. Predicting falls: The role of mobility and nonphysical factors. J Am Geriatr Soc1994; 42: 297-302.
3.
3 Ashburn A, Stack E, Pickering RM, Ward CD. A community-dwelling sample of people with Parkinson's disease: characteristics of fallers and non-fallers. Age Ageing2001; 30:47-52.
4.
4 Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C. Falls can be reduced in older people. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet1999; 353:93-97.
5.
5 Stuck AE, Aronow HU, Steiner A et al. Trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med1995; 333: 1184-1189.
6.
6 Fabacher D, Josephson K, Pietruszka F, Linderborn K, Morley JE, Rubenstein LZ. An in-home preventive assessment program for independent older adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc1994; 42: 630-638.
7.
7 Elkan R, Kendrick D, Hewitt M et al. The effectiveness of domiciliary health visiting: a systematic review of international studies and a selective review of the British literature. Health Technol Assess2000; 4: 13-13.
8.
8 Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management in the twenty-first century. London: Department of Health, 2001.
9.
9 Fries JF, C Carey, D McShane. Patient education in arthritis: randomized controlled trial of a mail-delivered program. J Rheumatol1997; 24: 1378-1383.
10.
10 Lorig KR, Mazonson PD, Holman S. Evidence suggesting that health-education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health-care costs. Arthritis Rheum1993; 36: 439-446.
11.
11 Taal E, Rasker JJ, Seydel ER, Wiegman O. Health-status, adherence with health recommendations, self-efficacy and social support in patients with rheumatoid-arthritis. Patient Educ Counselling1993; 20:63-76.
12.
12 Montgomery EB Jnr, Lieberman A, Singh G et al. Patient education and health promotion can be effective in Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Med1994; 97: 429-435.
13.
13 O'Hara L, Cadbury H, de Souza L, Ide L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self-care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 119-128.
14.
14 Bergstrom N, Braden B, Boynton P, Bruch S. Using a research-based assessment scale in clinical practice. Nurs Clin North Am1995; 30: 539-551.
15.
15 Lincoln NB, Gladman JRF. The extended activities of daily living scale: a further validation. Disabil Rehabil1992; 14:41-43.
16.
16 Goldberg DP, Williams P. A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1988.
17.
17 General Register Ofice. Classification of occupations. London: HMSO, 1966.
18.
18 The Neurological Alliance. Living with a neurological condition. London: The Neurological Alliance, 1996.
19.
19 Bury M. The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociol Health Illness1991; 13: 451-468.
20.
20 Guldan GS. Obstacles to community health promotion. Soc Sci Med1996; 43: 689-695.
21.
21 Marge M. Health promotion for people with disabilities: moving beyond rehabilitation. Am J Health Promotion1988; 2:29-35.
22.
22 Becker HA, Stuifbergen AK, Ingalsbe K, Sands D. Health-promoting attitudes and behaviours among persons with disabilities. Int J Rehabil Res1989; 12: 235-250.
23.
23 Robinson I. Multiple sclerosis. London: Routledge, 1988: 84-85, 23-23.
24.
24 Department of Health press release: National Service Framework for Long-term Conditions. Accessed 2001 from http://www.doh.gov.uk/nsf/longterm.htm
