Differences in outcome of a multidisciplinary treatment between subgroups of chronic low back pain patients defined using two multiaxial assessment instruments: the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and lumbar dynamometry

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of a multidisciplinary back school programme (Roessingh Back Rehabilitation Programme, RRP) compared with usual care, as well as differences in treatment outcome between subgroups defined using two multiaxial assessment instruments: the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-DLV) and lumbar dynamometry.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Rehabilitation.

Subjects: One hundred and sixty-three patients with chronic, aspecific low back pain.

Intervention: All subjects were randomly assigned either to a multidisciplinary, physically oriented group treatment or to their usual care.

Main outcome measures: The Roland Disability Questionnaire and health-related quality of life (EuroQol, EQ5-D) were measured as primary outcomes before randomization and after eight weeks and six months follow-up.

Result: Only 30-50% of the patients in the RRP group showed improvement and this number is not significantly different from the control group. Subgroup analyses give some first indications that multiaxial measurement instruments can be used to identify subgroups with differences in treatment effects.

Conclusion: The overall effect of a multidisciplinary treatment is disappointing, however multiaxial assessment before admission might be valuable in clinical practice, resulting in more effective treatments for patients with chronic low back pain.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Koes BW , van Tulder MW , van der Windt WM , Bouter LM . The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 851-862.

2 Nentwig G . Effektivität der Rückenschule . Ein überblick über die ergebnisse der evidenz-basierten evaluation. Orthopäde 1999; 28: 958-956.

3 Tulder van MW , Ostelo R , Vlaeyen JWS et al. Behavioural treatment of chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the cochrane back review group. Spine 2000a; 25: 2688-2699.

4 Tulder van MW , Esmail R , Bombardier C , Koes BW . Back schools for non-specific low back pain. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.

5 Karjalainen K , Malmivaara A , van Tulder M et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults. Spine 2001; 26: 262-269.

6 DiFabio RP , Efficacy of comprehensive rehabilitation programmes and back school for patients with acute back pain: a meta-analysis. Phys Ther 1995; 75: 865-878.

7 Tulder van M , Malmivaara A , Esmail R , Koes B . Exercise therapy for low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 2000; 25:2784-2796.

8 Timm KE . A randomized-control study of active and passive treatment for chronic low back pain following L5 laminectomy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 20: 276-286.

9 Frost H , Klaber Moffett JA , Moser JS , Fairbank JCT . Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for pateints with chronic low back pain. BMJ 1995; 310: 151-154.

10.

10 Scheer SJ , Radack KL , O'Brien DR . Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1. Acute interventions. Review Article. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:966-973.

11.

11 Leclaire R , Esdaile JM , Suissa S et al. Back School in a first episode of compensated acute low back pain: a clinical trial to assess efficacy and prevent relapse. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 673-679.

12.

12 Lindstrom I. , Ohlund C , Nachemson A . Physical performance, pain, pain behavior and subjective disability in patients with subacute low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995; 27: 153-160.

13.

13 Vlaeyen JWS , Kole-Snijders AMJ , Rutten-van Mölken MPM et al. Chronic low-back pain: what does cognitive coping skills training add to operant behavioural treatment? Results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67: 931-944.

14.

14 Mannion AF , Müntener M , Taimela S , Dvorak J . Volvo award winner in clinical studies. A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 1999; 24: 2435-2448.

15.

15 Talo S , Rytökoski U , Puukka P . Patient classification, A key to evaluate pain treatment: a psychological study in chronic low back pain patients. Volvo award in clinical science. Spine 1992;17: 998-1011.

16.

16 Turk DC , Rudy TE . Towards a comprehensive assessment of chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther 1987; 25: 237-249.

17.

17 Haazen IWCJ , Vlaeyen, JWS , Kole-Snijders A et al. Behavioural rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: searching for predictors of treatment outcome. J Rehabil Sci 1994; 7:34-43.

18.

18 Fredrickson BE , Trief PM , VanBeveren P et al. Rehabilitation of the patient with chronic back pain. A search for outcome predictors. Spine 1988; 13: 351-353.

19.

19 Talo S , Puukka P , Rytökoski U et al. Can treatment outcome of chronic low back pain be predicted? Psychological disease consequences clarifying the issue. Clin J Pain 1994; 10: 107-121.

20.

20 Turk DC , Rudy TE . The robustness of an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients. Pain 1998; 43:27-35.

21.

21 Hirsch G , Beach G , Cooke C et al. Relationship between performance on lumbar dynamometry and Waddell score in population with low back pain. Spine 1991; 16: 1039-1043.

22.

22 Hutten MMR , Hermens HJ , IJzerman MJ et al. Distribution of psychological aspects in subgroups of chronic low back pain patients divided on the score of physical performance. Int J Rehabil Res 1999; 22: 261-268.

23.

23 Hutten MMR , Hermens HJ , Zilvold G . Differences in treatment outcome between subgroups of patients with chronic low back pain using lumbar dynamometry and psychological aspects. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 479-489.

24.

24 Lousberg R , van Breukelen GJP , Groenman NH et al. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional pain inventory, Dutch Language version (MPIDLV). Behav Res Ther 1999; 37: 167-182.

25.

25 Pocock SJ . Clinical trials. A practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1983.

26.

26 Brooks R , with the EuroQol Group . EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72.

27.

27 Dolan P . Modeling valuations for Euroqol health status. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095-1108.

28.

28 Roland M , Morris R . A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Volvo award in clinical science. Spine 1983; 8: 141-145.

29.

29 Bergner M , Bobbit RA , Kressel S et al. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6: 393-415.

30.

30 Vlaeyen JWS , Kole-Snijders AMJ , Rotteveel AM et al. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil 1995; 5: 235-252.

31.

31 Derogatis LR . SCL-90R. Manual II. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometrics Research, 1983.

32.

32 Arrindel WA , Ettema JHM . SCL-90 Handleiding bij een psychopathologie indicator. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1986.

33.

33 Isotechnologies Inc. B-200 user's manual revision 2.0. Hillborough, NC: Isotechnologies Inc., 1991.

34.

34 Deutsch SD . B200 back evaluation system, version 3.0. By the Occupational Orthopaedic Center, Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Hillsborough, NC: Isotechnologies Inc., 1991: 41-52.

35.

35 Medeiros K . OOC test interpretation. Proceedings of Applications'93 Isotechnologies' National Symposium, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, 1993: 33-36.

36.

36 Goubert L , Crombez G , Vlaeyen JWS et al. De Tampa schaal voor kinesiofobie. Psychometrische karakteristieken en normering. Gedrag en Gezondheid 2000; 28:55-62.

37.

37 Groenman NH , Rober IM , Reitsma B et al. Patiënten met chronische benigne pijn: nader psychometrisch onderzoek met de SCL-90, NVBPijnbulletin 1993; 3:9-12.

38.

38 Deyo RA . Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Review article. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 1044-1053.

39.

39 Bronfort G . Bouter LM . Responsiveness of general health status in chronic low back pain: a comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36. Pain 1999; 83: 201-209.

40.

40 Zachrissen Forsell, M . The Swedish back school. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 112-114.

41.

41 Winter, F. Pijnrevalidatie voor chronische pijnpatiënten. De pijn de baas. Dissertation Universiteit Twente, 1992.

42.

42 Fordyce WE . The behavioural management of chronic pain: a response to critics. Pain 1985; 22: 113-125.