The long-term outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of an educational–behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2004
The long-term outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of an educational–behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis
Objective: To evaluate the long-term effects of joint protection on health status of people with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Design: A four-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial was conducted.
Setting: Two rheumatology outpatient departments.
Participants: People with rheumatoid arthritis less than five years since diagnosis.
Interventions: Two 8-hour interventions were originally compared: a standard arthritis education programme, including 21/2 hours of joint protection based on typical UK occupational therapy practice (plus 51/2 hours on RA, exercise, pain management, diet and foot care); and a joint protection programme, using educational-behavioural training.
Main measures: Adherence to joint protection, pain, hand pain on activity, Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 and Arthritis Self-efficacy were recorded at 0 and 4 years.
Results: Sixty-five people attended the joint protection and 62 the standard programmes. Groups at entry were similar in age (51 years; 49 years), disease duration (21 months: 17.5 months) and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying drugs. At four years, the joint protection group continued to have significantly better: joint protection adherence (p=0.001); early morning stiffness (p=0.01); AIMS2 activities of daily living (ADL) scores (p=0.04) compared with the standard group. The joint protection group also had significantly fewer hand deformities: metacarpophalangeal (MCP) (p=0.02) and wrist joints (p=0.04).
Conclusion: Attending an educational=behavioural joint protection programme significantly improves joint protection adherence and maintains functional ability long term. This approach is more effective than standard methods of training and should be more widely adopted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Young A, Dixey J, Cox N et al. How does functional ability in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affect patients and their lives? Results of 5 years of follow-up in 732 patients from the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study (ERAS)Rheumatology2000; 39: 603–611.
2.
2 Eberhardt KB, Rydgren LC, Petersson H, Wollheim FA. Early rheumatoid arthritis–onset, course and outcomes after two years. Rheumatol Int1990; 10: 135–142.
3.
3 Hammond A, Kidao R, Young A. Hand impairment and function in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum2000; 43 (9 suppl): S285-S285.
4.
4 Cordery J, Rocchi M. Joint protection and fatigue management. In: Melvin J, Jensen G eds. Rheumatologic rehabilitation, Volume 1: Assessment and management. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998: 279–322.
5.
5 Melvin J. Rheumatic disease: occupational therapy and rehabilitation, second edition. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1989: 351–371.
6.
6 Riemsma RP, Kirwan JR, Taal E, Rasker JJ. Patient education for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
7.
7 Hammond A, Freeman K. One year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of an educational–behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology2001; 40: 1044–1051.
8.
8 Brus HLM, van der Laar MAFJ, Taal E, Rasker JH. Effects of patient education on compliance with basic treatment regimens and health in recent onset active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis1998; 57: 146–151.
9.
9 Hammond A, Lincoln N, Sutcliffe L. A crossover trial evaluating an educational–behavioural joint protection education programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Educ Counselling1999; 37:19–32.
10.
10 Hammond A, Jeffreson P, Jones N, Gallagher J, Jones T. Clinical applicability of an educationalbehavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritisBr J Occup Ther2002; 65: 405–412.
11.
11 Hammond A, Lincoln N. The effect of a joint protection education programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 392–400.
12.
12 Hammond A. Lincoln N. Development of the Joint Protection Behaviour Assessment. Arthritis Care Res1999; 12: 200–207.
13.
13 Scott DL, van Riel PL, van der Heijde D, Benke AS. Assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: The EULAR handbook of standard methods. Vienna: EULAR Handbook Publishers, 1993.
14.
14 Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum1992; 35:1–10.
15.
15 Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum1989; 32:37–44.
16.
16 Callahan LF, Brooks RH, Pincus T. Further analysis of learned helplessness in rheumatoid arthritis using a ‘Rheumatology Attitudes Index’. J Rheumatol1988; 15: 418–426.
17.
17 Superio-Cabuslay E, Ward MM, Lorig KP. Patient education interventions in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis comparison with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment. Arthritis Care Res1996; 9: 292–301.
18.
18 SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) (2000). Management of early rheumatoid arthritis. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Accessed February 2004, from www.sign.ac.uk
19.
19 Lorig K, Lubeck D, Kraines RG, Seleznick M, Holman HR. Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum1985; 28: 680–685.
20.
20 Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC. Long-term outcomes of an arthritis self-management programme. Br J Rheumatol1998; 37: 1315–1319.
21.
21 Hammond A, Badcock LJ. Improving education about arthritis: identifying the educational needs of people with chronic inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology2002; 41 (suppl 1): 87(216).
22.
22 Boutagh ML, Brady TJ. Patient education for arthritis self-management. In: Robbins L, Burckhardt CS, Hannan MT, DeHoratius RJ eds. Clinical care in the rheumatic diseasessecond edition. Atlanta, GA: Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (American College of Rheumatology), 2001: 155–162.
23.
23 Freeman K, Hammond A, Lincoln NB. Use of cognitive behavioural arthritis education programmes in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rehabil2002; 16: 828–836.
24.
24 Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviours. In: Hersen M, Eisler RM, Miller PM eds. Progress in behaviour modification. Leatherhead: Sycamore Press, 1992.
25.
25 Brady TJ, Sniezek JE, Conn DL. Enhancing patient self-management in clinical practice. Bull Rheum Dis2000; 49:1–4.
26.
26 Arthritis Research Campaign. Looking after your joints when you have rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Research Campaign, St Mary's Court, St Mary's Gate, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, 2001.
27.
27 Miller WR, Rollnick S. Facilitating change. In: Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change, second edition. New York: Guilford Press, 2002: 20–29.
28.
28 Lorish C. Psychological factors related to treatment and adherence. In: Melvin J, Jensen G eds. Rheumatologic rehabilitation series, Volume 1: Assessment and management. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998: 39–63.
