Objectives: To explore the impact of two methods of post-hospital stroke rehabilitation on both carers' perceptions of the health services offered and their quality of life.
Setting: East Dorset Health Authority.
Subjects: Forty-six informal carers were recruited from a sample of 106, initially identified from stroke patients participating in a larger randomized controlled trial.
Design: Qualitative methods.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were used at baseline and six months to explore carers' perception of a good therapy, the advantages and disadvantages of the different services and their fulfilment with the services. In-depth thematic analysis was carried out to explore the impact of the two different methods of service delivery on carers' quality of life.
Results: Day hospitals provided carers with respite opportunities, whilst domiciliary stroke teams provided carers with better educational opportunities to be involved in therapy. No qualitative difference was found in the impact that the different services had on carers' quality of life, which were influenced by factors such as the degree of disruption that caring had on their lives, the loss of a shared life and the availability of social support. Ultimately, carers saw the services as providing benefit for survivors and not themselves.
Conclusions: Domiciliary stroke teams provided informal stroke carers with skills that could help improve postdischarge stroke rehabilitation amongst stroke survivors. Informal carers also benefited from the respite elements of day hospital. A mixed model using both domiciliary care and day hospital care, could provide carers with the benefits of education, convenience and respite.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Widen Holmqvist L, Von Koch L, De-Pedro Cuesta J. Use of healthcare, impact on family caregivers and patient satisfaction of rehabilitation of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm. Scand J Rehabil Med2000; 32: 173-179.
2.
2 Department of Health. The New NHS White Paper. London: HMSO. 1997.
3.
3 Evans RL, Connis RT, Bishop DS, Hendricks RD, Haselkorn JK. Stroke: A family dilemma. Disabil Rehabil1994; 16: 110-118.
4.
4 Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart Wynne EG. A population-based assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke1995; 26: 843-849.
5.
5 Forster A, Young J. Specialist nurse support for patients with stroke in the community: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ1996; 312: 1642-1646.
6.
6 Dennis M, O'Rourke S, Slattery J, Staniforth T, Warlow C. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ1997; 314: 1071-1076.
7.
7 Mant J, Carter J, Wade DT, Winner S. Family support for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2000; 356: 808-813.
8.
8 Roderick P, Low J, Day R et al. Stroke rehabilitation after hospital discharge: a randomised trial comparing domiciliary and day-hospital care. Age Ageing2000; 30: 303-310.
9.
9 Gladman J, Whynes R, Lincoln N. Cost comparison of domiciliary and hospital-based stroke rehabilitation. Age Ageing1994; 23: 241-245.
10.
10 Young JB, Forster A. The Bradford community stroke trial: results at six months. BMJ1992; 304: 1085-1089.
11.
11 Gladman JRF, Lincoln NB, Barer DH. A randomised controlled trial of domiciliary and hospital-based rehabilitation for stroke patients after discharge from hospital. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1992; 56: 960-966.
12.
12 Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ1995; 311:42-45.
13.
13 Dowswell G, Lawler J, Young J, Forster A, Hearn J. A qualitative study opecialist nurse support for stroke patients and care-givers at home. Clin Rehabil1997; 11: 283-290.
14.
14 Dowswell G, Dowswell T, Lawler J, Green J, Young J. Patients' and caregivers' expectations and experiences of a physiotherapy intervention 1 year following stroke. JEval Clin Pract2002; 8: 361-365.
15.
15 Stephenson S, Wiles R. Advantages and disadvantages of the home setting for therapy: views of patients and therapists. Br J Occup Ther2000; 63:59-64.
16.
16 Low J, Payne S, Roderick P. The impact of stroke on informal carers: a literature review. Soc Sci Med1999; 49: 711-725.
17.
17 Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage Publication. 1993.
18.
18 Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P. Unpacking the black box of therapy - a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions with people with stroke. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 301-309.
