Objective: Prevailing measures of subjective caregiver burden either have no overall summary score or do not consider the relative importance caregivers attach to different dimensions of burden. Our aim was to assess which dimensions informal caregivers perceive as being important to their overall burden from care giving.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Subjects: Data were pooled from two Dutch samples of primary informal caregivers covering a wide range of chronic care-giving situations: caregivers for stroke survivors (n = 196) and caregivers for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 131).
Main measures: Subjective burden of care giving was assessed using the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and the Self-Rated Burden scale (SRB).
Results: In the total sample four of the five dimensions of the CRA were found to contribute to the overall subjective burden experienced by informal caregivers. In the individual stroke and RA samples only two of the five dimensions emerged as relevant. SRB scores were significantly higher for caregivers of stroke patients, but no differences were found for the five dimensions of the CRA between the two samples.
Conclusions: The dimensions of CRA are not equally important to the overall subjective burden of informal caregivers. To assess overall subjective burden, a measure based on a caregiver's own assessment of burden such as SRB needs to be used in addition to prevailing measures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Han B, Haley WE. Family caregiving for patients with stroke: review and analysis. Stroke1999; 30: 1478-1485.
2.
2 Montgomery RJV, Gonyea JG, Hooyman NR. Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden. Fam Relat1985; 43:19-26.
3.
3 Brouwer WBF, Van Exel NJA, Van den Berg B, Van den Bos GAM, Koopmanschap MA. Process utility from providing informal care: The benefit of caring. Submitted.
4.
4 Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. JAMA1999; 282: 2215-2219.
5.
5 Van der Lyke S. Informal care makes patients: from ideal to pragmatism [Mantelzorg maakt patiënten: van ideaal naar pragmatisme; in Dutch]. Tijdschrift Gezondheid Politiek13:7-9.
6.
6 Van Exel NJA, Koopmanschap MA, Van den Berg B, Brouwer WBF, Van den Bos GAM. Burden of informal care giving for stroke patients: identification of caregivers at risk of adverse health effects. Cerebrovasc Dis, in press.
7.
7 Robinson BC. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. J Gerontol1983; 38: 344-348.
8.
8 Scholte op Reimer WJM, de Haan RJ, Pijnenborg JMA, Limburg M, van den Bos GAM. Assessment of burden in partners of stroke patients with the Sense of Competence Questionnaire. Stroke1998; 29: 373-379.
9.
9 Given CW, Given B, Stommel M, Collins C, King S, Franklin S. The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairment. Res Nurs Health1992; 15: 271-283.
10.
10 Van Exel NJA, Scholte op Reimer WJM, Brouwer WBF, Van den Berg B, Van den Bos GAM, Koopmanschap MA. Instruments for assessing the burden of informal care giving for stroke patients in clinical practice: a comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burden. Clin Rehabil2004; 18: 203-214.
11.
11 Huijsman R, Klazinga NS, Scholte op Reimer WJM et al. Results of the EDISSE evaluation of three regional experiments with stroke services [Beroerte, beroering en borging in de keten: Resultaten van de EDISSE studie van drie regionale experimenten met stroke services; in Dutch]. Report on behalf of ZonMw, Den Haag, NL, 2001.
12.
12 Jacobi CE, Triemstra M, Rupp I, Dinant HJ, Van Den Bos GA. Health care utilization among rheumatoid arthritis patients referred to a rheumatology center: unequal needs, unequal care?Arthritis Rheumatol2001; 45: 324-330.
13.
13 Brouwer WBF, NJA van Exel, B van den Berg, HJ Dinant, MA Koopmanschap, GAM van den Bos. The burden of care giving: Evidence on objective burden, subjective burden and quality of life impacts in informal caregivers for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (in press).
14.
14 Jacobi CE, van den Berg B, Boshuizen HC, Rupp I, Dinant HJ, van den Bos GAM. Dimension-specific burden of care giving among partners of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology2003; 42:1-8.
15.
15 Van den Heuvel ET, de Witte LP, Schure LM, Sanderman R, Meyboom-de Jong B. Risk factors for burn-out in caregivers of stroke patients, and possibilities for intervention. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 669-677.
16.
16 Han B, Haley WE. Family care giving for patients with stroke: review and analysis. Stroke1999; 30: 1478-1485.
17.
17 Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM. Determinants of care giving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer1999; 86: 577-588.
18.
18 Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM. Measuring both negative and positive reactions to giving care to cancer patients: psychometric qualities of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). Soc Sci Med1999; 48: 1259-1269.
19.
19 The EuroQol Group. EuroQol a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy1999; 16: 199-208. See also www.euroqol.org
20.
20 Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK population norms for EQ-5D. Discussion paper 172. Centre for Health Economics, The University of York, York, UK, 1999.
21.
21 Dolan P. Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care1997; 35: 1095-1108.
22.
22 Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke?Stroke1997; 28: 1876-1882.
23.
23 Meiland FJ, Danse JA, Wendte JF, Klazinga NS, Gunning-Schepers LJ. Caring for relatives with dementia caregiver experiences of relatives of patients on the waiting list for admission to a psycho geriatric nursing home in the Netherlands. Scand J Public Health2001; 29: 113-121.
24.
24 Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Mulder M, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM. Patterns of caregiver experiences among partners of cancer patients. Gerontologist2000; 40: 738-746.
