Objective: To determine whether an early increased-intensity upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improves outcome.
Design: A randomized controlled trial.
Setting: A stroke unit which provides acute care and rehabilitation for all stroke admissions.
Subjects: One hundred and twenty-three patients who had had a stroke causing upper limb impairment within the previous 10 days.
Intervention: The intervention group received stroke unit care plus enhanced upper limb rehabilitation provided jointly by a physiotherapist and occupational therapist, commencing within 10 days of stroke, and available up to 30 minutes/day, five days/week for six weeks. The control group received stroke unit care.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) three months after stroke. Secondary outcome measures: Motricity Index; Frenchay Arm Test; upper limb pain; Barthel ADL Index; Nottingham E-ADL Scale; and costs to health and social services at three and six months after stroke.
Results: There were no differences in outcomes between the intervention and control groups three and six months after stroke. During the intervention period the intervention group received a median of 29 minutes of enhanced upper limb therapy per working day as inpatients. The total amount of inpatient physiotherapy and occupational therapy received by the intervention group was a median of 52 minutes per working day during the intervention period and 38 minutes per working day for the control group (p = 0.001). There were no differences in service costs.
Conclusions: An early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme jointly provided by a physiotherapist and occupational therapist did not improve outcome after stroke. The actual difference in the amount of therapy received by intervention and control groups was less than planned due to a competitive therapy bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Skilbeck C, Wade D, Langton-Hewer R, Wood V. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1983; 46: 5–8.
2.
Heller A, Wade D, Wood V, Sunderland A, Langton-Hewer R, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1987; 50: 714–719.
3.
Broeks J, Lankhorst G, Rumping K, Prevo A. The long term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow up study. Disabil Rehabil1999; 21: 357–364.
4.
Friedman P. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Stud1990; 12: 119–122.
5.
Wade D. Editorial. Clin Rehabil1997; 11: 91–92.
6.
Lincoln N, Parry R, Vass C, Appleyard M. A randomised controlled trial of early additional physiotherapy for the upper limb after stroke. Physiotherapy1998; 84: 397-397.
7.
Kalra L, Dale P, Crome P. Improving stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Stroke1993; 24: 1462–1467.
8.
Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke1997; 28: 1550–1556.
9.
van der Lee JH, Snels IA, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 20–31.
10.
Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet1999; 354: 191–196.
11.
Lincoln N, Parry R, Vass C. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke1999; 30: 573–579.
12.
Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley E, Fletcher D, Langton-Hewer R, Wade D. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1992; 55: 530–535.
13.
Feys H, de Weerdt W, Selz B et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Stroke1998; 29: 785–792.
14.
Kidd GMI, Lawes N. Understanding neuromuscular plasticity. London: Edward Arnold, 1992.
15.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet1974; 2: 81–84.
16.
Al-Khawaja I, Wade D, Collin C. Bedside screening for aphasia: a comparison of two methods. J Neurol1996; 243: 201–204.
17.
Hodkinson H. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing1972; 1: 233–239.
18.
Bamford J, Sandercock P, Warlow CP, Slattery J, Inter-observer agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke1989; 20: 828–844.
19.
De Souza L, Langton-Hewer R, Miller S. Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. Int Rehabil Med1980; 2: 3–9.
20.
Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet1991; 337: 1521–1526.
21.
Nouri F, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil1987; 1: 301–330.
22.
Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol1980; 19: 382–389.
23.
Halligan P, Wilson B, Cockburn J. A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud1990; 12: 95–99.
24.
Brott T, Adams H, Olinger C et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke1989; 20: 864–870.
25.
Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res1981; 4: 483–492.
26.
Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. London: Heinemann Medical Books, 1990.
27.
Langhammer B. Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled study. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 361–369.
28.
Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J1965; 14: 612–615.
29.
Hsieh C-L, Hsueh IP, Chiang F-M, Lin P-H. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients. Age Ageing1998; 27: 107–113.
30.
Netten A, Rees T, Harrison G. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent at Canterbury, 2001.
31.
Rodgers H, Dennis M, Cohen D, Rudd AG on behalf of the British Association of Stroke Physicians. Benchmarking Survey of Stroke Services. Age Ageing2003; 31: 1–7.
32.
Langhorne P, Dennis M. Stroke units: an evidence based approach. London: BMJ Books, 1998.
33.
Taub E, Miller N, Novack T et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 347–354.
34.
van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke1999; 30: 2369–2375.
35.
Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?Stroke2000; 31: 2984–2988.
36.
Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P. Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 301–309.
37.
Lettinga A, Reynders K, Mulder T, Mol A. Pitfalls in effectiveness research: a comparative analysis of treatment goals and outcomes measures in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil2001; 16: 174–184.
38.
Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better?Physiother Res Int1996; 1: 75–88.
39.
Duncan P. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil1997; 3: 1–20.
40.
Richards L, Pohl P. Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function. Clin Geriatr Med1999; 15: 819–832.
