Objective: To describe and compare the content, feasibility, outcome parameters, and clinimetric properties of the manual wheelchair skills tests reported in the literature.
Design: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Current Contents. Tests were selected if they were observational tests, designed for subjects using hand-rim wheelchairs and were intended to assess wheelchair skill performance at the activity level.
Results: The search resulted in 34 papers, in which 24 different wheelchair skills tests were described. The skill most frequently included was wheelchair propulsion, consecutively followed by transferring, negotiating kerbs, ascending slopes, traversing tracks, sprinting and performing a wheelie. The three most frequently used outcome parameters were task performance time, independency of task performance, and physical strain during skill performance. Sensitivity to change was evaluated in three tests, validity in 10 tests, and reliability in nine tests.
Conclusions: Many tests are applied to measure wheelchair skill performance using different tasks and outcome measures. This makes it difficult to compare study results. Consensus among researchers as to which skills must be included as well as to standardization of the use of measurement instruments will reduce this problem and will additionally lead to a better insight in the quality of tests.
Britell CW. Wheelchair prescription. In: Lehmann JF, Kottke FJ eds. Krusen's handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation, fourth edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990: 548–563.
3.
Bussmann JBJ, Stam HJ. Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 455–464.
4.
WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. ICIDH-2 final draft. Geneva: WHO, 2001.
5.
Agre JC, Findley TW, McNally MC et al. Physical activity capacity in children with myelomeningocele. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 372–377.
6.
Bolin I, Bodin P, Kreuter M. Sitting position – posture and performance in C5–C6 tetraplegia. Spinal Cord2000; 38: 425–434.
7.
Capodaglio P, Grilli C, Bazzini G. Tolerable exercise intensity in the early rehabilitation of paraplegic patients. A preliminary study. Spinal Cord1996; 34: 684–690.
8.
Dallmeijer AJ, van der Woude LHV, Hollander AP, Angenot ELD. Physical performance in persons with spinal cord injuries after discharge from rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc1999; 31: 1111–1117.
9.
Dallmeijer AJ, van der Woude LHV, Hollander AP, van As HHJ. Physical performance during rehabilitation in persons with spinal cord injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc1999; 31: 1330–1335.
10.
Duffill J, Buckley J, Lang D, Neil-Dwyer G, McGinn F, Wade D. Prospective study of omental transposition in patients with chronic spinal injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2001; 71: 73–80.
11.
Dunkerley AL, Ashburn A, Stack EL. Deltoid triceps transfer and functional independence of people with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord2000; 38: 435–441.
12.
Duran FS, Lugo L, Ramirez L, Lic EE. Effects of an exercise program on the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1349–1354.
13.
Findley TW, Agre JC. Ambulation in the adolescent with spina bifida. II. Oxygen cost of mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69: 855–861.
14.
Gans BM, Haley SM, Hallenborg SC, Mann N, Inacio CA, Faas RM. Description and interobserver reliability of the Tufts Assessment of Motor Performance. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1988; 67: 202–210.
15.
Gouvier WD, Cottam G, Webster JS, Beissel GF, Wofford JD. Behavioral interventions with stroke patients for improving wheelchair navigation. Int J Clin Neuropsychol1984; 6: 186–190.
16.
Haley SM, Ludlow LH, Gans BM, Faas RM, Inacio CA. Tufts assessment of motor performance: an empirical approach to identifying motor performance categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991; 72: 359–366.
17.
Haley SM, Ludlow LH. Applicability of the hierarchical scales of the Tufts Assessment of Motor Performance for school-aged children and adults with disabilities. Phys Ther1992; 72: 191–202; discussion 202–206.
18.
Harvey LA, Batty J, Fahey A. Reliability of a tool for assessing mobility in wheelchair-dependent paraplegics. Spinal Cord1998; 36: 427–431.
19.
Hutzler Y. Physical performance of elite wheelchair basketball players in armcranking ergometry and in selected wheeling tasks. Paraplegia1993; 31: 255–261.
20.
Janssen TWJ, Van Oers CAJM, Van der Woude LHV, Hollander AP. Reliability of heart rate responses to non-steady-state activities of daily living in men with spinal cord injuries. Scand J Rehabil Med1994; 26: 71–78.
21.
Janssen TWJ, van Oers CAJM, Veeger HEJ, Hollander AP, van der Woude LHV, Rozendal RH. Relationship between physical strain during standardised ADL tasks and physical capacity in men with spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia1994; 32: 844–859.
22.
Janssen TWJ, van Oers CAJM, Rozendaal EP, Willemsen EM, Hollander AP, van der Woude LHV. Changes in physical strain and physical capacity in men with spinal cord injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc1996; 28: 551–559.
23.
Jebsen RH, Trieschmann RB, Mikulic MA, Hartley RB, McMillan JA, Snook ME. Measurement of time in a standardized test of patient mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1970; 51: 170–175.
24.
Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 380–390.
25.
Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, MacLeod DA, Monroe R. The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 10–18.
26.
Lehmann JF, Warren CG, Halar E, Stonebridge JB, DeLateur BJ. Wheelchair propulsion in the quadriplegic patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1974; 55: 183–186.
27.
Mattison PG, Hunter J, Spence S. Development of a realistic method to assess wheelchair propulsion by disabled people. Int J Rehabil Res1989; 12: 137–145.
28.
Mizukami M, Kawai N, Iwasaki Y et al. Relationship between functional levels and movement in tetraplegic patients. A retrospective study. Paraplegia1995; 33: 189–194.
29.
Panikoff LB. Recovery trends of functional skills in the head-injured adult. Am J Occup Ther1983; 37: 735–743.
30.
Schnelle JF, MacRae PG, Ouslander JG, Simmons SF, Nitta M. Functional Incidental Training, mobility performance, and incontinence care with nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc1995; 43: 1356–1362.
31.
Schnelle JF, MacRae PG, Giacobassi K, MacRae HSH, Simmons SF, Ouslander JG. Exercise with physically restrained nursing home residents: maximizing benefits of restraint reduction. J Am Geriatr Soc1996; 44: 507–512.
32.
Simmons SF, Schnelle JF, MacRae PG, Ouslander JG. Wheelchairs as mobility restraints: predictors of wheelchair activity in nonambulatory nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc1995; 43: 384–388.
33.
Taricco M, Colombo C, Adone R, Chiesa G, Di Carlo S, Borsani M et al. The social and vocational outcome of spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia1992; 30: 214–219.
34.
Taricco M, Apolone G, Colombo C, Filardo G, Telaro E, Liberati A. Functional status in patients with spinal cord injury: a new standardized measurement scale. Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi Riabilitativi. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 1173–1180.
35.
Vanlandewijck YC, Daly DJ, Theisen DM. Field test evaluation of aerobic, anaerobic, and wheelchair basketball skill performances. Int J Sports Med1999; 20: 548–554.
36.
Webster JS, Cottam G, Gouvier WD, Blanton P, Beissel GF, Wofford J. Wheelchair obstacle course performance in right cerebral vascular accident victims. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1989; 11: 295–310.
37.
Webster JS, Rapport LJ, Godlewski MC, Abadee PS. Effect of attentional bias to right space on wheelchair mobility. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1994; 16: 129–137.
38.
Webster JS, Roades LA, Morrill B et al. Rightward orienting bias, wheelchair maneuvering, and fall risk. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 924–928.
