Objectives: To describe the prevalence of self-reported changes in life satisfaction after multiple trauma, to analyse associations between satisfaction with life as a whole and with domains in life, and to identify important contributors for satisfaction with life.
Design: Retrospective follow-up study.
Setting: Rehabilitation hospital three years after multiple trauma.
Subjects: Sixty-nine subjects with severe multiple trauma (ISS 3 16).
Main outcome measures: Clinical examinations to reveal prevalences of impairments and disabilities. Questionnaires about satisfaction with life as a whole and eight domains of life, both for the time before trauma, and for the actual situation; sense of coherence (SOC-13); social network.
Results: A total of 87% experienced a decrease in at least one of the nine life satisfaction items from before to after trauma (six-graded scale). After trauma significantly fewer subjects reported to be satisfied5–6 with life as a whole, as well as the domains sexual life, ADL, contact with friends, leisure, vocational and financial situation. Satisfaction with family life and partner relationship did not decrease significantly. The most important domains after trauma were satisfaction with leisure, family life and vocation. Vocational and leisure disability after trauma were important determinants for satisfaction with life as a whole. A strong sense of coherence and sufficient social network quality had significant impact on satisfaction with life as a whole and some of the domain-specific satisfactions.
Conclusions: Both personal resources (a strong sense of coherence) and the presence of a qualitatively sufficient social network can buffer the negative influence of disabilities on life satisfaction after trauma.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anke AGW, Stanghelle JK, Finset A et al. Long-term prevalence of impairments and disabilities after multiple trauma. J Trauma1997; 40: 54–61.
2.
Antonovsky A. Unravelling the mystery of healthHow people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987.
3.
Vazques Mata G, Rivera Fernandez R, Perez Aragon A et al. Analyses of quality of life in polytraumatized patients two years after discharge from an Intensive Care Unit. J Trauma1996; 41: 326–332.
4.
Rhodes M, Aronson J, Moerkirk G, Petrash E. Quality of life after the trauma center. J Trauma1988; 28: 931–938.
5.
Thiagarajan J, Taylor P, Hogbin E, Ridley S. Quality of life after multiple trauma requiring intensive care. Anaesthesia1994; 49: 211–218.
6.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer KS. Happiness and domain-specific satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil1991; 5: 25–33.
7.
Veenhoven R. Is happiness relative?Social Indicators Res1991; 24: 1–34.
8.
Tatarkiewicz W. Analysis of happiness. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1976.
9.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer KS. On life satisfaction, happiness and rehabilitation. [In Swedish] J Soc Med1991; 1: 33–41.
10.
Michalos AC. Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Res1985; 16: 347–413.
11.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med2002; 34: 239–246.
12.
Sagy S, Antovovsky A, Adler I. Explaining life satisfaction in later life: the sense of coherence model and activity theory. Behav Health Aging1990; 1: 11–25.
13.
Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med1993; 36: 725–733.
14.
Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haldon W et al. The Injury Severity Score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma1974; 14: 187-187.
15.
Committee on Injury Scaling. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 revision. Arlington Heights, IL: American Association of Automotive Medicine, 1990.
16.
Vardeberg K, Kolsrud M, Laberg T. Sunnaas Index of ADL. World Fed Occup Ther Bull1991; 24–30.
17.
Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer AR. On nonwork activity preferences: relationship with occupational roles. Disabil Rehabil1994; 16: 205-205.
18.
Viitanen M, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bernspång B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in long-term survivors after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med1988; 20: 17–24.
19.
Kivioja AH, Pertti JM, Pentti UR. Is the treatment of the most severe multiple injured patients worth the effort? A follow-up examination 5–20 years after severe multiple injury. J Trauma1990; 30: 480–480.
20.
Bränholm I-B, Lundmark P, Månsson M, Fugl-Meyer AR. On life satisfaction in subjects with neurological disorders. Neurol Rehabil1996; 2: 63–67.
21.
Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sødring KM, Pettersen AM, Bautz-Holter E. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil1997; 11: 139–145.
22.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Lodnert G, Bränholm IB, Fugl-Meyer KS. On life satisfaction in male erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res1997; 9: 141–148.
23.
Eklund M. On vocational rehabilitation in Northern Sweden. Medical dissertation. New Series No 318, University of Umeå, Sweden, 1991.
24.
Vogel LC, Klaas SJ, Lubicky JP, Anderson CJ. Long-term outcomes and life satisfaction of adults who had pediatric spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 1496–1503.
25.
Westgren N, Levi R. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 1433–1439.
26.
Lindberg M. On functions, abilities and quality of life after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Medical dissertation. New series NO 450, University of Umeå, Sweden, 1995.
27.
Diener E, Fujita F. Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: a nomothetic and idiographic approach. J Person Soc Psychol1995; 68: 926–935.
28.
Bränholm I-B, Eklund M, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. On work and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Sci1991; 4: 29–34.
29.
Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer AR, Frölunde A. Life satisfaction, sense of coherence and locus of control in occupational therapy students. Scand J Occup Ther1998; 5: 39–44.
